Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 23:37 +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote:
So to avoid thread hijacking, starting a new one.
What exactly is this thread you are starting about? Just letting us know
you did some random testing?
I think this is a reference to news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
where I was asking about what would be a good distributed scm. Thanks for
testing jokey.
There was a massive thread on the git/bzr lists which marienz pointed out,
which has TBH given me a massive headache ;) The gist of what I read was
that both use UUIDs, but bzr leans towards local rev ids for styles of
development where full distribution is not required (ie star topographies.)
Additionally, bzr makes a new rev every time there is a merge, even if
nothing has changed.
I like the bzr approach of providing a framework, but I guess I'm still
leaning towards git, as I'm not really after a framework per se. So it's
good to know you can set up a repo which will commit to a svn parent.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
