Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent flag name in some packages? webm and vpx speifically

2012-04-07 Thread Paweł Rumian
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org:

 Thank you for your report. Yes this looks like an issue. If I had to
 choose I'd pick 'vpx' but it seems to me that media-video@ and
 mozilla@ teams needs to reach consensus.

Should I poke them in any way? Reopen and assign the bug to them?

BR,
Paweł Rumian



Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent flag name in some packages? webm and vpx speifically

2012-04-07 Thread Aaron W. Swenson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 04/07/2012 07:52 AM, Paweł Rumian wrote:
 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org:
 
 Thank you for your report. Yes this looks like an issue. If I had
 to choose I'd pick 'vpx' but it seems to me that media-video@
 and mozilla@ teams needs to reach consensus.
 
 Should I poke them in any way? Reopen and assign the bug to them?
 
 BR, Paweł Rumian
 
Yes. Yes.

I'd vote that the flag name should be 'webm' as that's more readily
recognizable than 'vpx'.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAk+ALAQACgkQVxOqA9G7/aBe8gEAj2LSviLEzQasFXmJzjT0oiHp
cEuId91yPkkdWH3sZbUA/29RjvgHCA/gCmKIfkq1arV0z7ZbsP11bBezwUoxcW1f
=GG+2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



[gentoo-dev] Inconsistent flag name in some packages? webm and vpx speifically

2012-04-03 Thread Paweł Rumian
Hello,

I've been directed here from the bugzilla:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410585
I will copy my bug report from there, so no need to click :)

Currently there are two different flags which pull the same
library (media-libs/libvpx) for the same purpose.

vpx : Enables vp8 codec support using libvpx, required to play some
HTML5 videos

webm: Use system media-libs/libvpx for HTML5 WebM video
support.

Generally webm is somewhat wider term than vp8 (see e.g. here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebM), but in all ebuilds I have checked
webm USE flag just pulls the vp8 implementation library - libvpx.

I am not 100% sure, but to me it seems like webm and vpx USE flags
should be unified.

$ equery hasuse -p vpx
* Searching for USE flag vpx ...
[-P-] [  ] media-plugins/gst-plugins-meta-0.10-r6:0.10
[IP-] [  ] media-plugins/gst-plugins-meta-0.10-r7:0.10
[-P-] [  ] media-video/avidemux-2.5.6-r1:2
[-P-] [  ] media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8:0
[-P-] [  ] media-video/ffmpeg-0.10:0
[IP-] [  ] media-video/ffmpeg-0.10.2:0
[-P-] [ -] media-video/ffmpeg-:0
[-P-] [  ] media-video/libav-0.6.5:0
[-P-] [  ] media-video/libav-0.7.4:0
[-P-] [ -] media-video/libav-0.7.:0
[-P-] [  ] media-video/libav-0.8:0
[-P-] [  ] media-video/libav-0.8.1:0
[-P-] [ -] media-video/libav-0.8.:0
[-P-] [ -] media-video/libav-:0
[-P-] [  ] media-video/mplayer-1.0_rc4_p20110322-r1:0

$ equery hasuse -p webm
* Searching for USE flag webm ...
[-P-] [  ] mail-client/thunderbird-8.0-r1:0
[-P-] [  ] mail-client/thunderbird-9.0:0
[-P-] [  ] mail-client/thunderbird-10.0:0
[-P-] [  ] mail-client/thunderbird-10.0.1:0
[-P-] [  ] mail-client/thunderbird-10.0.1-r1:0
[-P-] [  ] mail-client/thunderbird-10.0.3:0
[-P-] [  ] mail-client/thunderbird-11.0.1:0
[-P-] [  ] net-libs/xulrunner-2.0.1-r1:1.9
[-P-] [  ] www-client/firefox-8.0:0
[-P-] [  ] www-client/firefox-9.0:0
[-P-] [  ] www-client/firefox-10.0:0
[-P-] [  ] www-client/firefox-10.0.1:0
[-P-] [  ] www-client/firefox-10.0.1-r1:0
[-P-] [  ] www-client/firefox-10.0.3:0
[-P-] [  ] www-client/firefox-11.0-r1:0
[-P-] [M ] www-client/icecat-10.0-r1:0
[-P-] [M ] www-client/icecat-10.0-r2:0
[-P-] [ -] www-client/seamonkey-2.4.1-r1:0
[-P-] [ -] www-client/seamonkey-2.7.1:0
[-P-] [  ] www-client/seamonkey-2.7.1-r1:0
[-P-] [  ] www-client/seamonkey-2.8:0
[-P-] [  ] www-client/seamonkey-2.8-r1:0

best regards,
Paweł Rumian



Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent flag name in some packages? webm and vpx speifically

2012-04-03 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 04/03/2012 05:33 PM, Paweł Rumian wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I've been directed here from the bugzilla: 
 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410585 I will copy my bug
 report from there, so no need to click :)
 
 Currently there are two different flags which pull the same library
 (media-libs/libvpx) for the same purpose.
 
 vpx : Enables vp8 codec support using libvpx, required to play
 some HTML5 videos
 
 webm: Use system media-libs/libvpx for HTML5 WebM video support.
 
 Generally webm is somewhat wider term than vp8 (see e.g. here: 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebM), but in all ebuilds I have
 checked webm USE flag just pulls the vp8 implementation library -
 libvpx.
 
 I am not 100% sure, but to me it seems like webm and vpx USE flags 
 should be unified.
 
 $ equery hasuse -p vpx * Searching for USE flag vpx ... [-P-] [  ]
 media-plugins/gst-plugins-meta-0.10-r6:0.10 [IP-] [  ]
 media-plugins/gst-plugins-meta-0.10-r7:0.10 [-P-] [  ]
 media-video/avidemux-2.5.6-r1:2 [-P-] [  ]
 media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8:0 [-P-] [  ] media-video/ffmpeg-0.10:0 
 [IP-] [  ] media-video/ffmpeg-0.10.2:0 [-P-] [ -]
 media-video/ffmpeg-:0 [-P-] [  ] media-video/libav-0.6.5:0 
 [-P-] [  ] media-video/libav-0.7.4:0 [-P-] [ -]
 media-video/libav-0.7.:0 [-P-] [  ] media-video/libav-0.8:0 
 [-P-] [  ] media-video/libav-0.8.1:0 [-P-] [ -]
 media-video/libav-0.8.:0 [-P-] [ -] media-video/libav-:0 
 [-P-] [  ] media-video/mplayer-1.0_rc4_p20110322-r1:0
 
 $ equery hasuse -p webm * Searching for USE flag webm ... [-P-] [
 ] mail-client/thunderbird-8.0-r1:0 [-P-] [  ]
 mail-client/thunderbird-9.0:0 [-P-] [  ]
 mail-client/thunderbird-10.0:0 [-P-] [  ]
 mail-client/thunderbird-10.0.1:0 [-P-] [  ]
 mail-client/thunderbird-10.0.1-r1:0 [-P-] [  ]
 mail-client/thunderbird-10.0.3:0 [-P-] [  ]
 mail-client/thunderbird-11.0.1:0 [-P-] [  ]
 net-libs/xulrunner-2.0.1-r1:1.9 [-P-] [  ]
 www-client/firefox-8.0:0 [-P-] [  ] www-client/firefox-9.0:0 [-P-]
 [  ] www-client/firefox-10.0:0 [-P-] [  ]
 www-client/firefox-10.0.1:0 [-P-] [  ]
 www-client/firefox-10.0.1-r1:0 [-P-] [  ]
 www-client/firefox-10.0.3:0 [-P-] [  ]
 www-client/firefox-11.0-r1:0 [-P-] [M ]
 www-client/icecat-10.0-r1:0 [-P-] [M ] www-client/icecat-10.0-r2:0 
 [-P-] [ -] www-client/seamonkey-2.4.1-r1:0 [-P-] [ -]
 www-client/seamonkey-2.7.1:0 [-P-] [  ]
 www-client/seamonkey-2.7.1-r1:0 [-P-] [  ]
 www-client/seamonkey-2.8:0 [-P-] [  ]
 www-client/seamonkey-2.8-r1:0
 
 best regards, Paweł Rumian
 
Hi,

Thank you for your report. Yes this looks like an issue. If I had to
choose I'd pick 'vpx' but it seems to me that media-video@ and
mozilla@ teams needs to reach consensus.

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
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=WooC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-