Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-05-29 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:18:38PM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
 I have now p.masked app-laptop/ibm-acpi. It will be removed from the
 tree in 30 days.

Gone.

./Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd


pgpgwdui5RTi6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-05-01 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:52:20PM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
 Unless somebody has a really good reason as to why we should keep the
 external module in portage I will package.mask it in a week from now
 and remove it from portage 30 days later.

I have now p.masked app-laptop/ibm-acpi. It will be removed from the
tree in 30 days.

Regards,
Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd


pgpo1ongyvx5X.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-30 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:52:20PM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
 Unless somebody has a really good reason as to why we should keep the
 external module in portage I will package.mask it in a week from now
 and remove it from portage 30 days later.

I have now package.masked app-laptop/ibm-acpi pending removal in 30
days.

Regards,
Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd


pgpA9BqPHDqri.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-24 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 07:03:02PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
 That's a different matter. I didn't realize that it was 2.6 _only_. My
 apologies. I should have looked for that before responding.
 
 Also: while there are still a couple of 2.6 kernels in the tree prior to
 2.6.10, I'm going to speculate that the arm, sparc, and s390 crowds are
 not so interested in that particular module.

It's x86 only, some stuff for thinkpad laptops.

cheers,
Wernfried

-- 
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org
Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org
IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org


pgpFvXt8lCYkU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi,

The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in
the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been no releases of
the stand-alone module since March 2005.

Unless somebody has a really good reason as to why we should keep the
external module in portage I will package.mask it in a week from now
and remove it from portage 30 days later.

Regards,
Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd


pgpmGsOK8ok2I.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Drake Wyrm
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in
 the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been no releases of
 the stand-alone module since March 2005.

Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the
next few weeks?

-- 
This message has been brought to you by the letter three.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Tim Yamin
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
 Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in
  the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been no releases of
  the stand-alone module since March 2005.
 
 Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the
 next few weeks?

No, some of the 2.4 kernels (e.g. hardened/gentoo-sources) are still
maintained.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 22 April 2006 15:46, Tim Yamin wrote:
 On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
  Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in
   the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been no releases of
   the stand-alone module since March 2005.
 
  Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the
  next few weeks?

 No, some of the 2.4 kernels (e.g. hardened/gentoo-sources) are still
 maintained.

and vanilla-sources certainly isnt going anywhere

linux-2.4 will be supported for quite sometime
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
 Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the
 next few weeks?

What does that have to do with ibm-acpi? The module doesn't compile
against linux-2.4.x anyways.

./Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd


pgpicSI85Nimd.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Drake Wyrm
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
  Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the
  next few weeks?
 
 What does that have to do with ibm-acpi? The module doesn't compile
 against linux-2.4.x anyways.

That's a different matter. I didn't realize that it was 2.6 _only_. My
apologies. I should have looked for that before responding.

Also: while there are still a couple of 2.6 kernels in the tree prior to
2.6.10, I'm going to speculate that the arm, sparc, and s390 crowds are
not so interested in that particular module.

-- 
I used to think romantic love was a neurosis shared by two, a supreme
foolishness. I no longer thought that. There's nothing foolish in
loving anyone. Thinking you'll be loved in return is what's foolish.
  -- Rita Mae Brown


pgpbafw8PBmFO.pgp
Description: PGP signature