[gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed for app-portage/flagedit app-portage/profuse dev-util/libconf
Moin, is anybody interested to maintain the following packages? | app-admin/config_confd | app-portage/flagedit | app-portage/profuse | dev-util/libconf If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week. https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=app-admin/config_confd,app-portage/flagedit,app-portage/profuse,dev-util/libconf -- Regards
Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed for app-portage/flagedit app-portage/profuse dev-util/libconf
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:32:07 +0100 Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote: If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week. If nobody is interested indeed, I'd appreciate a longer removal period as I'm currently working on a replacement script, called flaggie [1]. Although it can be considered working already, I'd like to polish it a little and implement the basic feature set before the first release. [1] http://github.com/mgorny/flaggie -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed for app-portage/flagedit app-portage/profuse dev-util/libconf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 3.11.2010 14:48, Michał Górny napsal(a): On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:32:07 +0100 Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote: If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week. If nobody is interested indeed, I'd appreciate a longer removal period as I'm currently working on a replacement script, called flaggie [1]. Although it can be considered working already, I'd like to polish it a little and implement the basic feature set before the first release. [1] http://github.com/mgorny/flaggie And why the heck you are not working on making it part of gentoolkit + equery (the same way i incorporated eshowkw). Tom -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzRcdYACgkQHB6c3gNBRYeLZQCePKRFIlD38FToDMksV9VQj2MI VkoAmwRSusErWENORwPNObr34xbKmJES =T2yQ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed for app-portage/flagedit app-portage/profuse dev-util/libconf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:29:42 +0100 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote: And why the heck you are not working on making it part of gentoolkit + equery (the same way i incorporated eshowkw). Because I dislike the all-in-one packaging idea. Separate development allows me to use git and make releases whenever it is necessary, without re-releasing all the unchanged tools. In other words, why the heck we are not working on replacing split X11 ebuilds into one large xf86 or why the heck we are working on monolithic KDE ebuilds? - -- Best regards, Michał Górny -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzRc0oACgkQnGSe5QXeB7u51wCgnOCaBHWIhvvMICDIPQ3fMBgP bc8AoN0plN5sSvMMlfCjETESQQCA9o9Q =I6ij -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed for app-portage/flagedit app-portage/profuse dev-util/libconf
Just wondering, why did you abuse classes that badly and hack way through optparse? If it limits your needs you might want to take a look at argparse. Domen On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 14:48 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:32:07 +0100 Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote: If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week. If nobody is interested indeed, I'd appreciate a longer removal period as I'm currently working on a replacement script, called flaggie [1]. Although it can be considered working already, I'd like to polish it a little and implement the basic feature set before the first release. [1] http://github.com/mgorny/flaggie signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed for app-portage/flagedit app-portage/profuse dev-util/libconf
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:41:46 +0100 Domen Kožar do...@dev.si wrote: Just wondering, why did you abuse classes that badly and hack way through optparse? If it limits your needs you might want to take a look at argparse. With classes, I hope to clean that up a little soon. My ideas changed a little during the project development (especially that it was started some time ago already and left unmaintained for a while) and first I'd like to make everything working and then start cleaning up what will remain unclean. And for argparse, I wasn't aware of it when the option parsing code was written. And right now, I still don't see a reason to use it. Especially that I would need to care about additional dependencies for python:2.6. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
