Re: [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for dev-libs/libowfat; net-misc/slidentd www-servers/gatling

2009-08-09 Thread Victor Ostorga 
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 21:20:59 -0500
Chip Parker  wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
> > Chip Parker  said:
> >> dev-libs/libowfat _does_ build. I currently have the version
> >> complained about in the bug installed on amd64, try instead
> >> compiling with  >
> > If it doesn't build with gcc-4.4, it better go sooner rather than
> > later, because its going to break in a week.  He doesn't maintain
> > the package, do you?  If so, then please send the bug report
> > upstream and become the maintainer of this package if you want to
> > keep it around.
> >
> 
> Completely unnecessary, last rites was premature. See the bug, the
> problem was in dietlibc, which has actually already been fixed, which
> is why there's a dietlibc bump bug currently waiting for someone to
> resolve ;)
> 

Ok guys, libowfat can build using gcc 4.4 and glibc 2.10 with
dev-libs/dietlibc-0.32 , for which I submitted a bug (#280941). Once
#280941 is done we can save dev-libs/libowfat.

Víctor.

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for dev-libs/libowfat; net-misc/slidentd www-servers/gatling

2009-08-09 Thread Chip Parker 
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
> Chip Parker  said:
>> dev-libs/libowfat _does_ build. I currently have the version
>> complained about in the bug installed on amd64, try instead compiling
>> with 
> If it doesn't build with gcc-4.4, it better go sooner rather than later,
> because its going to break in a week.  He doesn't maintain the package,
> do you?  If so, then please send the bug report upstream and become the
> maintainer of this package if you want to keep it around.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Mark Loeser
> email         -   halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
> email         -   mark AT halcy0n DOT com
> web           -   http://www.halcy0n.com
>

Completely unnecessary, last rites was premature. See the bug, the
problem was in dietlibc, which has actually already been fixed, which
is why there's a dietlibc bump bug currently waiting for someone to
resolve ;)

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for dev-libs/libowfat; net-misc/slidentd www-servers/gatling

2009-08-09 Thread Mark Loeser 
Chip Parker  said:
> dev-libs/libowfat _does_ build. I currently have the version
> complained about in the bug installed on amd64, try instead compiling
> with http://www.halcy0n.com


pgpZQbQ157vZB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for dev-libs/libowfat; net-misc/slidentd www-servers/gatling

2009-08-09 Thread Chip Parker 
dev-libs/libowfat _does_ build. I currently have the version
complained about in the bug installed on amd64, try instead compiling
with  wrote:
>
> # Diego E. Pettenņ  (09 Aug 2009)
> #  on behalf of QA team
> #
> # Removal of dev-libs/libowfat because it fails to build (bug
> # #272507) and lacks a proper Gentoo maintainer. Dependencies
> # follow the mask.
> #
> # sys-process/minit is already masked for removal
> #
> # net-misc/slidentd also links statically (bug #273326).
> #
> # Removal on 2009-10-08
> dev-libs/libowfat
> net-misc/slidentd www-servers/gatling
>
>

[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for dev-libs/libowfat; net-misc/slidentd www-servers/gatling

2009-08-09 Thread Diego E . Pettenò 

# Diego E. Pettenò  (09 Aug 2009)
#  on behalf of QA team
#
# Removal of dev-libs/libowfat because it fails to build (bug
# #272507) and lacks a proper Gentoo maintainer. Dependencies
# follow the mask.
#
# sys-process/minit is already masked for removal
#
# net-misc/slidentd also links statically (bug #273326).
#
# Removal on 2009-10-08
dev-libs/libowfat
net-misc/slidentd www-servers/gatling