[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for sys-fs/dd-rhelp

2010-10-22 Thread Diego E . Pettenò

# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (22 Oct 2010)
#  on behalf of QA team
#
# Outdated even by upstream standards (last version is 0.1.2,
# bug #223299 open May 2008); uses obsolete head/tail syntax
# (bug #159606); has maintainer-mode-triggered rebuild (bug
# #318487) without depending on autotools (and thus fail if
# automake 1.8 is not installed).
#
# Removal on 2010-12-21
sys-fs/dd-rhelp



[gentoo-dev] QA last rites for sys-fs/dd-rhelp

2010-10-22 Thread Diego E . Pettenò

# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (22 Oct 2010)
#  on behalf of QA team
#
# Obsolete even by upstream standard, since version 0.1.2
# is out since 2007 (and has a version bump request in bug
# #223299 since May 2008); uses “obsolete” tail/head
# syntax (bug #159606, the warning has since been removed
# from coreutils); more importantly autotools are rebuilt by
# a maintainer-mode-triggered check, but no dependency over
# autotools, with or without the correct version is present
# (bug #318487; automake 1.8 is nowadays not that common to
# find installed).
#
# Removal on 2010-12-21
sys-fs/dd-rhelp



Re: [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for sys-fs/dd-rhelp

2010-10-22 Thread Wernfried Haas
Hi,

while this is a tool i never like to use, it's really hand in case you
have it around.

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 09:23:30AM +0200, Diego E. Pettenò wrote:
 # Obsolete even by upstream standard, since version 0.1.2
 # is out since 2007 (and has a version bump request in bug
 # #223299 since May 2008);

Agreed.

  uses ???obsolete??? tail/head
 # syntax (bug #159606, the warning has since been removed
 # from coreutils); 

in dd_rhelp-0.1.2: # grep head dd_rhelp
i=$(echo $parsechunk | ${head} -n 1 )
firstline=$(echo $parsing | ${head} -n 1)
firstline=$(echo $parsing | ${head} -n 1)
lnb_save=$(echo $lnb_save | ${head} -n 1 | cut -f 1 -d  )

That seems to be the new syntax already.

 more importantly autotools are rebuilt by
 # a maintainer-mode-triggered check, but no dependency over
 # autotools, with or without the correct version is present
 # (bug #318487; automake 1.8 is nowadays not that common to
 # find installed).

Also from 0.1.2:
Installation (for dd_rhelp  0.1.0)
===

   Installation process have been greatly simplified with version
   0.1.0 as
   it as been completely removed ! Removing the previous hassle of the 
   ./configure  make  make install normally reserved for
   languages that requires compilation.

   So for version superior to 0.1.0, installation is only a mean of a
   direct
   use of dd_rhelp, or a simple cp dd_rhelp /your/bin/path.


So basically 0.1.2 should fix all those problems.

I'd do it myself if i were ebuild maintainer (which i am not), but
maybe someone could pick this up and just make a new ebuild for 0.1.2?
Seems to be a quite simple job and whoever is willing to save this
really useful tool will get a beer from me next Linuxtag :-)

cheers,
Wernfried

-- 
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org
Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org
forum-mods (at) gentoo.org
#gentoo-forums (freenode)


pgpaZCLN2VTl6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for sys-fs/dd-rhelp

2010-10-22 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:50:21 +0200
Wernfried Haas a...@gentoo.org wrote:

 I'd do it myself if i were ebuild maintainer (which i am not), but
 maybe someone could pick this up and just make a new ebuild for 0.1.2?
 Seems to be a quite simple job and whoever is willing to save this
 really useful tool will get a beer from me next Linuxtag :-)

I don't think there's a reason to do so. We have ddrescue, and users
should be encouraged to migrate to that.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] QA last rites for sys-fs/dd-rhelp

2010-10-22 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 05:36:08PM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote:
 I don't think there's a reason to do so. We have ddrescue, and users
 should be encouraged to migrate to that.

Ah, found it (sys-fs/ddrescue, not sys-fs/dd-rescue) and it actually
does all the stuff that dd-rhelp does.
I guess in that case it's a good idea to let dd-rhelp go (probably
with a note to people like me who aren't aware that ddrescue does the
same job these days).
Thank you for the information.

Cheers,
   Wernfried

-- 
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org
Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org
forum-mods (at) gentoo.org
#gentoo-forums (freenode)


pgpzLsvATfPGm.pgp
Description: PGP signature