[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] custom-cflags global USE

[Ryan Hill]

Carsten Lohrke wrote:

 And I'd be fond of having all the -ffast-math filtering ripped out of the 
 tree 
 as well.

Please include -ftree-vectorize and -ftree-loop-linear along with that.
 I've yet to see a GCC release where they work correctly, including 4.2.


-- 
by design, by neglect
dirtyepic gentoo orgfor a fact or just for effect
9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] custom-cflags global USE

[Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-]

How about we just leave them as local use flags and move on?  global
vs. local is more then just about number of packages using the flag.
It has more to do with, Is this flag globally useful and relevant.
So far, I haven't seen a recently suggest local use flag that cries out
to be made global.

Michael Sterrett
  -Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Danny van Dyk wrote:


Am Mittwoch, 21. Februar 2007 18:25 schrieb Timothy Redaelli:

Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:32:56 +0100 Timothy Redaelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

wrote:
| What do you think about custom-cflags global USE?

I think it encourages policy violations.

http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/user-environment/index
.html


I know the policy, but sometimes upstream does not want user CFLAGS,
zsnes developers will remove support for Gentoo hosts from their bug
reports if i remove custom-cflags use and also mplayer.


What about making custom-cflags default in the base profile?

Danny
--
Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list