Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED
On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote: I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca So you broke the threading on the original email, you deleted all the previous content, you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail and then you claim you solved a problem without mentioning what the problem was. -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED
130401 Markos Chandras wrote: On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote: I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. So you broke the threading on the original email, you deleted all the previous content, you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail and then you claim you solved a problem without mentioning what the problem was. Your response is completely out of place very impolite. I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation help other users who may face the same problem, but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list. I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented, but I haven't criticised the developer responsible. Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list : Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 21:54:08 -0400 From: Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net To: Gentoo User gentoo-u...@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Udev 200 : dhcpcd problem + solution Message-ID: 20130401015408.ga...@ca.inter.net -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED
On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote: 130401 Markos Chandras wrote: On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote: I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. So you broke the threading on the original email, you deleted all the previous content, you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail and then you claim you solved a problem without mentioning what the problem was. Your response is completely out of place very impolite. I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation help other users who may face the same problem, but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list. I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented, but I haven't criticised the developer responsible. Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list : Oh but of course. This was more than obvious. Posting something to gentoo-dev just to inform us that you posted something to gentoo-user without even mentioning the title. And then you claim that my reply is out of place. Ok -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED
On 04/01/2013 01:06 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote: 130401 Markos Chandras wrote: On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote: I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. So you broke the threading on the original email, you deleted all the previous content, you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail and then you claim you solved a problem without mentioning what the problem was. Your response is completely out of place very impolite. I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation help other users who may face the same problem, but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list. I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented, but I haven't criticised the developer responsible. Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list : Oh but of course. This was more than obvious. Posting something to gentoo-dev just to inform us that you posted something to gentoo-user without even mentioning the title. And then you claim that my reply is out of place. Ok Is this a good time to point out that list archival is still broken? And has been for almost a year? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED
On Apr 1, 2013 8:53 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/01/2013 01:06 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote: 130401 Markos Chandras wrote: On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote: I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. So you broke the threading on the original email, you deleted all the previous content, you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail and then you claim you solved a problem without mentioning what the problem was. Your response is completely out of place very impolite. I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation help other users who may face the same problem, but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list. I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented, but I haven't criticised the developer responsible. Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list : Oh but of course. This was more than obvious. Posting something to gentoo-dev just to inform us that you posted something to gentoo-user without even mentioning the title. And then you claim that my reply is out of place. Ok Is this a good time to point out that list archival is still broken? And has been for almost a year? I don't see how this is relevant to this discussion. We are aware of that. The bug is still open
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED
I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
