[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in perl-core/IO-Compress:

2010-08-23 Thread Torsten Veller
* Mike Frysinger (vapier) vap...@gentoo.org:
 vapier  10/08/23 20:01:12
 
   Modified: IO-Compress-2.027.ebuild IO-Compress-2.024.ebuild
 IO-Compress-2.026.ebuild ChangeLog
 IO-Compress-2.025.ebuild IO-Compress-2.030.ebuild
 IO-Compress-2.021.ebuild
   Log:
   Add proper blockers to old split packages #274443.

  RDEPEND=virtual/perl-Scalar-List-Utils
   =virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-${PV}
 - =virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-${PV}
 + =virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-${PV}
 + !perl-core/Compress-Zlib
 + !perl-core/IO-Compress-Zlib
 + !perl-core/IO-Compress-Bzip2
 + !perl-core/IO-Compress-Base
  DEPEND=${RDEPEND}
  #test? ( dev-perl/Test-Pod )

How long do you think the blockers should exist?
12 months ago they were removed from perl-core.
16 months ago they were moved from dev-perl to perl-core. Do you want to
block them too?

Why didn't anybody reply to
mid.gmane.org/20100803082816.tac2b81f...@veller.net
It's the same problem.

-- 
Regards



Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in perl-core/IO-Compress:

2010-08-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, August 23, 2010 16:25:37 Torsten Veller wrote:
 * Mike Frysinger (vapier) vap...@gentoo.org:
Log:
Add proper blockers to old split packages #274443.
   
   RDEPEND=virtual/perl-Scalar-List-Utils
  =virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-${PV}
  -   =virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-${PV}
  +   =virtual/perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-${PV}
  +   !perl-core/Compress-Zlib
  +   !perl-core/IO-Compress-Zlib
  +   !perl-core/IO-Compress-Bzip2
  +   !perl-core/IO-Compress-Base
 
 How long do you think the blockers should exist?
 12 months ago they were removed from perl-core.
 16 months ago they were moved from dev-perl to perl-core. Do you want to
 block them too?

i re-added them because i just hit them on a box that while not kept up-to-
date every week, i wouldnt consider old.  i also dont think the 12 months 
quote there fully encapsulates the time frame of things being in stable.  this 
box certainly was up-to-date less than 12 months ago and it apparently missed 
this blocker time frame.

personally, i'd let these blockers sit for quite some time since it is really 
no overhead and doesnt require maintenance.
-mike


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.