[gentoo-dev] Re: missing metadata.xml
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Faulhammer) wrote: Donnie Berkholz schrieb: Christian Faulhammer wrote: Nice idea, but you should really add herdno-herd/herd as this is required if there is only a maintainer. Really? herd/ isn't valid? I'd rather see that than adding a fake herd. I though I read about it being mandatory with no-herd...yes Alec Warner wrote that (implicitly). But I am not really sure. At least, herd tag is mandatory, in whatever way. http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/misc-files/metadata/index.html http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/metastructure/herds/index.xml signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: missing metadata.xml
Tach,0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) dev-scheme/guile-pg scheme dev-scheme/kawa scheme dev-scheme/mzscheme scheme Done. V-Li -- Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777 6A91 E999 350A AD7C 2B85 9DE3 http://www.gnupg.org/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: missing metadata.xml
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:14 +0100, Christian Faulhammer wrote: I suggest the following changes: app-misc/baobab vapier and/or Gnome (as this is part of Gnome 2.16) Not gnome. baobab is part of gnome-utils as of 2.16, and gets installed from gnome-extra/gnome-utils which, I realize now, is begging for a app-misc/baobab blocker to avoid collisions *adds to his growing TODO list* Earlier I put app-admin/sabayon under gnome, which seemed to have been forgotten when moving over to portage from gnome-experimental overlay. I intend to personally take over maintenance of dev-util/sysprof and dev-util/memprof later on if no-one else is willing. /me pokes dev-tools herd for co-maintenance -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[gentoo-dev] Re: missing metadata.xml
Tach Donnie, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Donnie Berkholz schrieb: Christian Faulhammer wrote: Steve Dibb schrieb: There are more than a few packages with missing metadata.xml in the portage tree. I've setup my funky little QA website to report on which ones fall in that category, and here is the list right here: Nice idea, but you should really add herdno-herd/herd as this is required if there is only a maintainer. Really? herd/ isn't valid? I'd rather see that than adding a fake herd. I though I read about it being mandatory with no-herd...yes Alec Warner wrote that (implicitly). But I am not really sure. At least, herd tag is mandatory, in whatever way. V-Li -- Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777 6A91 E999 350A AD7C 2B85 9DE3 http://www.gnupg.org/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Re: missing metadata.xml
Tach Steve, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Steve Dibb schrieb: There are more than a few packages with missing metadata.xml in the portage tree. I've setup my funky little QA website to report on which ones fall in that category, and here is the list right here: Nice idea, but you should really add herdno-herd/herd as this is required if there is only a maintainer. By the way, I tagged some metadata files with appropriate herd (where I am allowed): app-emacs/cperl-modeemacs dev-lisp/cl-asdf-binary-locations common-lisp I suggest the following changes: app-misc/baobab vapier and/or Gnome (as this is part of Gnome 2.16) dev-scheme/guile-pg scheme dev-scheme/kawa scheme dev-scheme/mzscheme scheme dev-util/cweb text-markup and/or lang-misc V-Li -- Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777 6A91 E999 350A AD7C 2B85 9DE3 http://www.gnupg.org/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: missing metadata.xml
Christian Faulhammer wrote: Tach Steve, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Steve Dibb schrieb: There are more than a few packages with missing metadata.xml in the portage tree. I've setup my funky little QA website to report on which ones fall in that category, and here is the list right here: Nice idea, but you should really add herdno-herd/herd as this is required if there is only a maintainer. Really? herd/ isn't valid? I'd rather see that than adding a fake herd. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: missing metadata.xml
Donnie Berkholz wrote: Christian Faulhammer wrote: Nice idea, but you should really add herdno-herd/herd as this is required if there is only a maintainer. Really? herd/ isn't valid? I'd rather see that than adding a fake herd. Neither are valid from what I understand. IIRC, kloeri said that every package should belong to a herd. -- David Shakaryan GnuPG Public Key: 0x4B8FE14B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
