Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing gnophone from tree
* Gustavo Felisberto [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Gnophone is upstream dead. Does not build in amd64 (and probably other arches) failling on configure. Does anyone have an amd64 box I could play a little bit with ? I'd like to have a look at it. cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/ fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cellphone: +49 174 7066481 - -- DSL ab 0 Euro. -- statische IP -- UUCP -- Hosting -- Webshops -- - -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] Removing gnophone from tree
Gnophone is upstream dead. Does not build in amd64 (and probably other arches) failling on configure. I'm going to give this two weeks an then remove it if no one offers to solve this problems. (There is no open bug so one should contact me directly) -- Gustavo Felisberto (HumpBack) Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~humpback Blog: http://blog.felisberto.net/ It's most certainly GNU/Linux, not Linux. Read more at http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html . - signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing gnophone from tree
Gustavo Felisberto wrote: Gnophone is upstream dead. Does not build in amd64 (and probably other arches) failling on configure. I'm going to give this two weeks an then remove it if no one offers to solve this problems. (There is no open bug so one should contact me directly) What is wrong with the usual month? Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing gnophone from tree
Gustavo Felisberto wrote: Gnophone is upstream dead. Does not build in amd64 (and probably other arches) failling on configure. I'm going to give this two weeks an then remove it if no one offers to solve this problems. (There is no open bug so one should contact me directly) Open one please. Transparency and all that. If you don't want to do it yourself, e-mail me with the details and I will open one. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
