[gentoo-dev] Unmasking db 4.6

2008-04-25 Thread Caleb Tennis
Does anyone have any objections to unmasking db 4.6.21?  It's been in portage 
now
for a long time, but was quickly masked when some packages had some issues with 
it. 
The only remaining package that has an issue that I'm aware of is openldap, and 
I've
submitted a patch that makes openldap just use a lower installed db version.

Any other packages that need looked at, or does anyone else have thoughts or
objections?

Thanks,
Caleb

-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking db 4.6

2008-04-25 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 08:18 -0400, Caleb Tennis wrote:
 Does anyone have any objections to unmasking db 4.6.21?  It's been in portage 
 now
 for a long time, but was quickly masked when some packages had some issues 
 with it. 
 The only remaining package that has an issue that I'm aware of is openldap, 
 and I've
 submitted a patch that makes openldap just use a lower installed db version.
 
 Any other packages that need looked at, or does anyone else have thoughts or
 objections?

Most likely it will cause problems for XEmacs, which will probably be
easy to solve with some configure script tweaking. I've put testing it
on my todo list.

Kind regards,

Hans


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part