Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
On Friday 06 July 2007 06:08:43 Mike Frysinger wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so > -mike As Adam already pointed/asked earlier, are we going to see Kevin's work being merged with gcc-4.2 ? Or are we ever going to see hardened supoprt for gcc-4 ? I really appreciate your effort on doing gcc (and the whole lotta of other things you maintain), but we're (as in the hardened folks) getting rather impatient. It's been sitting on your plate for about a month (or is it two ?). If you can't do it yourself, please tell us. I think we have the resources to merge it into the tree ourselves. Thanks and kind regards, Christian -- Christian Heim GPG key ID: 9A9F68E6 Fingerprint: AEC4 87B8 32B8 4922 B3A9 DF79 CAE3 556F 9A9F 68E6 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
Mike Frysinger wrote: get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 in the next day or so -mike FYI, seems one of the R10K patches fails for mips after all (compile failure below). Probably a define that shifted and I'll have to go trace it down. So no unstable for us for now. ../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a libbackend.a(options.o):(.data.rel.ro+0x4774): undefined reference to `TARGET_R10K_SPECEX' libbackend.a(options.o):(.data.rel.ro+0x4914): undefined reference to `TARGET_R10K_SPECEX' libbackend.a(options.o):(.data.rel.ro+0x4934): undefined reference to `TARGET_R10K_SPECEX' libbackend.a(mips.o): In function `check_p_pattern_for_store': mips.c:(.text+0x3520): undefined reference to `TARGET_R10K_SPECEX' libbackend.a(mips.o): In function `mips_reorg': mips.c:(.text+0x6a64): undefined reference to `TARGET_R10K_SPECEX' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [cc1-dummy] Error 1 --Kumba -- Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead "Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
Luca Barbato wrote: > gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore? > > I'll give a test on ppc* soonish. I've been using it on x86 and ppc32 (ibook g4) for a week or two with no issues. Thanks, Donnie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so Will we see the hardened gcc-4 patchset included in this? --atj -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
On Friday 06 July 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > > in the next day or so > > From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use glibc2.5 > for now". Emacs herd seems to be in hiding, so I haven't been able to > confirm with them. this is due to some malloc changes which we already addressed in our ebuild by snipping the relevant upstream fix -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so > -mike - From the topic of #emacs: "glibc2.6 currently breaks emacs, use glibc2.5 for now". Emacs herd seems to be in hiding, so I haven't been able to confirm with them. Marijn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGjokEp/VmCx0OL2wRAvS0AKCKJVbzUlK8X49G+qL57RVkbFDLpgCgo2dv ktrumqwQGI/paU06eL2p5hg= =I8cX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
On Friday 06 July 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > > in the next day or so > > Why 4.2.0 rather than 4.2.1 RC1? Are there problems with the RC, or are > all important patches since 4.2.0 added by the ebuild already? Gentoo hasnt done RC's in a long time and i didnt really have any plans to start ... the toolchain overlay contains ebuilds for all weekly snaps ive added patches to gcc-4.2.0 based on initial testing from all you ricers out there and with the help of Ryan Hill i dont plan on gcc-4.2.0 ever hitting stable, just opening up the testers so gcc-4.2.1 will be smooth -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so Why 4.2.0 rather than 4.2.1 RC1? Are there problems with the RC, or are all important patches since 4.2.0 added by the ebuild already? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote: >> Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: >>> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 >>> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 >>> in the next day or so >> gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore? >> >> I'll give a test on ppc* soonish. > > i wasnt going to add ~ppc because of 179218, but i remember now that the bug > is for ppc64 only and i've been using gcc-4.2.0 on my quad since i added > it ... so i'll toss ~ppc into gcc-4.2.0 as well > -mike gcc-4.3 works fine on ppc64 so far ^^; lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
On Friday 06 July 2007, Luca Barbato wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > > in the next day or so > > gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore? > > I'll give a test on ppc* soonish. i wasnt going to add ~ppc because of 179218, but i remember now that the bug is for ppc64 only and i've been using gcc-4.2.0 on my quad since i added it ... so i'll toss ~ppc into gcc-4.2.0 as well -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 00:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so Been using it for a few weeks on ~x86-fbsd without issue now. Any chance you could add a patch [1] to it though that affects loops and -O2? Thanks Roy [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 00:08:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so > -mike -DRAC-WAS-HERE == -O4 now? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
Luca Barbato wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 in the next day or so -mike gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore? I see they got around to adding the -fno-rape-house-or-burn-pet flag. -- Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
On Friday, 6. July 2007 10:09, Petteri Räty wrote: > Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: > > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > > in the next day or so > > -mike > > About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of > course switch not used by default so that's ok. Debian is going to 4.2 in unstable these days too and they already found and fixed a lot of bugs. You can view a list of current and fixed ones here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.2;[EMAIL PROTECTED] A lot of the bugs are already quite old and might be fixed upstream already. Robert -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
Mike Frysinger wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so > -mike gcc-4.2.0 won't rape your house and burn your pet anymore? I'll give a test on ppc* soonish. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
Friday, 6. July 2007, Petteri Räty Ви написали: > Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: > > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course > switch not used by default so that's ok. If this makes people any happier - I had gnat-gcc-4.2.0 in the tree and ~arch (x86, amd64 and ppc) since when it came out, (that is approx 2 or 3 month now?) without any problems reported. That means technically gcc-4.2.0 with Ada support. However this does *not* clash with system gcc, so only Ada stuff was tested. Nonetheless, as I said, I did not get any 4.2.0 specific problem reports. Seemed to be a rather smooth ride so far.. George -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so > -mike About how many packages will break with the new gcc version? Of course switch not used by default so that's ok. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
On Friday 06 July 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > in the next day or so sorry, forgot about ~ia64 as well -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 06 July 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote: > > > Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump? > > no And there was great rejoicing. -- Jim Ramsay Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote: > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 > > Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump? no -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump? -- Jim Ramsay Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] glibc-2.6 / gcc-4.2 going into ~arch
get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing: glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86 gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86 in the next day or so -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
