[gentoo-dev] sandbox-1.3 testing request
can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin on their systems before i unmask it for everyone ... if you hit a bug, use bugzilla mmkay -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] sandbox-1.3 testing request
Mike Frysinger wrote: can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin on their systems before i unmask it for everyone ... if you hit a bug, use bugzilla mmkay -mike I pulled the latest git sources about a week ago and seemed like I hit a regression in the autoconf.. (I'm sure this isn't the case and probably a regression in my perl) Sorry I only have fuzzy details right now, but tested it about a week ago. If anyone is interested to take a look at it for Solaris I'm more than happy to try to provide ssh access to a dev machine with everything in place and ready to go. My results prior to the last ones were quite optimistic.. (feel free to pm me off list) btw.. Thanks Mike for the great work on this.. ./C
Re: [gentoo-dev] sandbox-1.3 testing request
On Sunday 07 December 2008 04:41:09 C. Bergström wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin on their systems before i unmask it for everyone ... if you hit a bug, use bugzilla mmkay I pulled the latest git sources about a week ago and seemed like I hit a regression in the autoconf.. (I'm sure this isn't the case and probably a regression in my perl) Sorry I only have fuzzy details right now, but tested it about a week ago. If anyone is interested to take a look at it for Solaris I'm more than happy to try to provide ssh access to a dev machine with everything in place and ready to go. My results prior to the last ones were quite optimistic.. (feel free to pm me off list) for the opensolaris stuff, i'd prefer to keep it in the previous thread on the gentoo-alt list -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] sandbox-1.3 testing request
Mike Frysinger wrote: can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin on their systems before i unmask it for everyone ... Thanks for looking after this important package. 1.3.2 isn't in CVS, did you mean 1.3.1? Daniel
Re: [gentoo-dev] sandbox-1.3 testing request
On Sunday 07 December 2008 12:34:29 Daniel Drake wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin on their systems before i unmask it for everyone ... Thanks for looking after this important package. 1.3.2 isn't in CVS, did you mean 1.3.1? yeah ... there are no bugfixes in 1.3.2 (which is in git), just speed improvements -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
