Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch
On 09/25/2013 03:07 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: On 09/24/2013 07:28 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: On 09/23/2013 22:41, Markos Chandras wrote: (unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits which is a worrying argument on its own) 11:16 #gentoo-bugs: +bonsaikitten ago: do me a favour and de-keyword all affected packages for s390 Also, nobody give me an award for the commits, so I really don't understand what you mean. I don't understand why you quote something from Patrick. All I am saying, is to avoid mass-commits for no reason. The stable keywords will be lost during time by removing old version of the packages. Unless you already have a broken depgraph ... which was the reason why I poked ago as he caused the initial breakage by optimistically masking too many versions of openldap.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch
24.09.2013 23:07, Markos Chandras пишет: On 09/24/2013 07:28 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: On 09/23/2013 22:41, Markos Chandras wrote: (unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits which is a worrying argument on its own) 11:16 #gentoo-bugs: +bonsaikitten ago: do me a favour and de-keyword all affected packages for s390 Also, nobody give me an award for the commits, so I really don't understand what you mean. I don't understand why you quote something from Patrick. All I am saying, is to avoid mass-commits for no reason. The stable keywords will be lost during time by removing old version of the packages. I think optimal solution here is to СС unstable arches on stable requests for new versions of packages to let them drop stable keywords. And if they are silent - dropping keywords with all revdeps by maintainer itself when other arches are done with stabilization. -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch
On 09/23/2013 22:41, Markos Chandras wrote: (unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits which is a worrying argument on its own) 11:16 #gentoo-bugs: +bonsaikitten ago: do me a favour and de-keyword all affected packages for s390 Also, nobody give me an award for the commits, so I really don't understand what you mean. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer
Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 09/24/2013 07:28 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: On 09/23/2013 22:41, Markos Chandras wrote: (unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits which is a worrying argument on its own) 11:16 #gentoo-bugs: +bonsaikitten ago: do me a favour and de-keyword all affected packages for s390 Also, nobody give me an award for the commits, so I really don't understand what you mean. I don't understand why you quote something from Patrick. All I am saying, is to avoid mass-commits for no reason. The stable keywords will be lost during time by removing old version of the packages. - -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJSQeLuXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzNTVDNDczOUYzRjJEMTRGNDRGMzU2RkMw OUJGNEY1NEMyQkE3RjNDAAoJEAm/T1TCun88CYMP/0yTCEJoK3j66St+mOEqwn0a 7n4fW1/GtlQWTI2NLmSA7UzT01wO0AT44rp84zs2nwToY/pQ9h5QPe9ktxkdtpuj spGYsLhtEdLwufYk9nQOOgPeQ9v4y3xzZfmtzqPJrf2mNywECXg58O4AlEWMBQAN p+ntBFub70J4zSk42p4jNr6SEIm3fkzCKLDh2a/CE4CYaG+4U4Bzy1arwj+uRi4P YbHK90x2RvI/gG9VBVTuaDwir8x5qZmAlgOEkFiiSpcvM2Ht6jl1eiF+wgIHXy9B zfZ83JF86iXZo1+naT7F92awcU7sSIS+oFE+ElF/NwCP+idlMM2y7Ui+/irXTPSt xpSgus96fpquM+2Ab38tY1ILQRysKBc2QEi/PJ+FB0yx1tNb8LN1xGTqBMySMhEW p6it2wKcsCEaPzfveuMupe6L2QgA/nvR/FILTQccL9WivfvsBT4zAUzK1DaKowSV NkH4RhL3R6GAXvWDQTXZqpm9SXoRzHQG3Xs74WuCM7b0rYHB0o0UxEB3vjUVraal r26GDxXUqPQjLPcKXf2d+6owVSDW3yNo7Ep0y3UJuzgRdpgFbt7F2chWMNTQFfAr Wo3MO3+Q4W2hck4LSehNKJk0ozR7SHUqkkTC1cPfDye9iqmxycVOSoO0++OsDiS9 9pDh/4YTkgkn0kPBMR/y =9a9b -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch
El mar, 24-09-2013 a las 22:38 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: Am Dienstag, 24. September 2013, 21:07:26 schrieb Markos Chandras: On 09/24/2013 07:28 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: On 09/23/2013 22:41, Markos Chandras wrote: (unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits which is a worrying argument on its own) 11:16 #gentoo-bugs: +bonsaikitten ago: do me a favour and de-keyword all affected packages for s390 Also, nobody give me an award for the commits, so I really don't understand what you mean. I don't understand why you quote something from Patrick. All I am saying, is to avoid mass-commits for no reason. The stable keywords will be lost during time by removing old version of the packages. Yeah, but while this process is ongoing, repoman will barf on the remaining stable set... so better remove it in one go. -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ Maybe repoman could be fixed: if ~sh and sh keywords will be enabled for sh users, why repoman doesn't follow it? (and, then, let both keywords to supply the needed deps)
Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch
Am Dienstag, 24. September 2013, 21:07:26 schrieb Markos Chandras: On 09/24/2013 07:28 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: On 09/23/2013 22:41, Markos Chandras wrote: (unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits which is a worrying argument on its own) 11:16 #gentoo-bugs: +bonsaikitten ago: do me a favour and de-keyword all affected packages for s390 Also, nobody give me an award for the commits, so I really don't understand what you mean. I don't understand why you quote something from Patrick. All I am saying, is to avoid mass-commits for no reason. The stable keywords will be lost during time by removing old version of the packages. Yeah, but while this process is ongoing, repoman will barf on the remaining stable set... so better remove it in one go. -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/
Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch
Am Montag, 23. September 2013, 22:03:49 schrieb Agostino Sarubbo: Hello, the council has decided[1] to drop m68k, sh, s390 to unstable. If someone has something to say about, this is the last opportunity or in few days I will start to mark them as ~arch. [1]: https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20130917-summary.txt Hey Ago, please at least wait until the step from the news item is done (next sunday) - the modification of ACCEPT_KEYWORDS in the profiles. If you do anything before that it will only mess things up. Cheers, A -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/
Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:03:49 +0200 Agostino Sarubbo a...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, the council has decided[1] to drop m68k, sh, s390 to unstable. If someone has something to say about, this is the last opportunity or in few days I will start to mark them as ~arch. is there a need to waste your time on this ? when mips was moved to ~arch it was done progressively: packages are moved to ~arch (~all) with new versions/revisions, no new stable keywords are added and old versions get removed.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch
On 09/23/2013 09:31 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:03:49 +0200 Agostino Sarubbo a...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, the council has decided[1] to drop m68k, sh, s390 to unstable. If someone has something to say about, this is the last opportunity or in few days I will start to mark them as ~arch. is there a need to waste your time on this ? when mips was moved to ~arch it was done progressively: packages are moved to ~arch (~all) with new versions/revisions, no new stable keywords are added and old versions get removed. I agree. There is absolutely *no* reason to drop the keywords on existing packages and cause massive downgrades/upgrades for people (unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits which is a worrying argument on its own) -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/23/2013 04:41 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: On 09/23/2013 09:31 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:03:49 +0200 Agostino Sarubbo a...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, the council has decided[1] to drop m68k, sh, s390 to unstable. If someone has something to say about, this is the last opportunity or in few days I will start to mark them as ~arch. is there a need to waste your time on this ? when mips was moved to ~arch it was done progressively: packages are moved to ~arch (~all) with new versions/revisions, no new stable keywords are added and old versions get removed. I agree. There is absolutely *no* reason to drop the keywords on existing packages and cause massive downgrades/upgrades for people (unless of course you want to increase your number of cvs commits which is a worrying argument on its own) The mass upgrades will happen when the profiles change ACCEPT_KEYWORDS from arch to ~arch no matter what. Fixing existing keywords just make things tidy. And ffs, ago has more commits than half the gentoo developers already, I'd be more worried if he wanted less commits. Ago, please keep up the good work, but after the profiles are updated. Thanks, Zero -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSQLYxAAoJEKXdFCfdEflK1XIQAJbGU2RKcAJi814P+PqPe4qU p/uC3Tlg06Sa5yHw/BvW1OXOj6Ah/RncRiiQKymQ4CxIp0cbFx4JJZMT3X4KoMMc Skw3u2JjQ3EQaxSpRF2pj1YMuwrajO7jS7143BwfKtH8diIfT5So5xCe05Mz2D2y QYusPIBAHsV4xU+DvCPYQ6cJvOqxXzcqqBLTGP6j27EnWgDuKfTrf5JI0FW5fYbD 4dSEMyyhfh2wgAilLjT63rspZgHajYTo6oVeE6Fv8RqXSotaGqTHiNT9HI8J3Q6S uQUiB3vGl0Af06SGBePvYNizhzklUTf6zlhNkSNg2yRG0ihFOmz4DrtLvhNnJfBJ mF/Mihlq3e0uNbxDag81v66vFnEJcrdZvgk8ty2Mdyc/Wo9HwQyY4p8g3tMtUJe+ B9jaIXD1HENQ9XkmqQrN9HJvgxw3S6eiqCBkgJ+3nUcjfUNbm9U2jbnmoQeZSYJt 5SPC42hbz5vZhdznhxvx24FgOyDHR1hgKHXYJJXqBGs91zYMz3f1lpw08ZLWM3F9 7NbPeDZ7YAhV5MeyjK5NAg/zrcJjHRCptc3WITR8u3mY48tzK+vLPqS1UVYxOfmV keJiN3k+lLgBlJzDfKfeEM7CZkOTNd7ADAkcdrC9eV5iprCfHzKaPm2jCjP24eC1 T/pgVMGmrpGPLOErHYGX =weaO -END PGP SIGNATURE-
