Re: [gentoo-dev] New media-libs/jpeg-7 and how to deal with it.

2009-08-22 Thread Samuli Suominen
Samuli Suominen wrote:
 This means you have change deps to || ( media-libs/jpeg-compat
 =media-libs/jpeg-7 ) for example. Feel free to use suitable alternative
 syntaxes.

Typo. Correct:

|| ( media-libs/jpeg-compat media-libs/jpeg-7 )



Re: [gentoo-dev] New media-libs/jpeg-7 and how to deal with it.

2009-08-22 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:01:47 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
 media-libs/jpeg-7 installs .so.7.0.0 so this causes some headacke for
 binary applications:

Doesn't this mean you should slot it?

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] New media-libs/jpeg-7 and how to deal with it.

2009-08-22 Thread Samuli Suominen
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
 On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:01:47 +0300
 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
 media-libs/jpeg-7 installs .so.7.0.0 so this causes some headacke for
 binary applications:
 
 Doesn't this mean you should slot it?
 

No. I only want the .so.62 for binary apps, thus the ebuild won't
install anything but the shared libs.



Re: [gentoo-dev] New media-libs/jpeg-7 and how to deal with it.

2009-08-22 Thread Mounir Lamouri
Samuli Suominen wrote:
 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
   
 On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:01:47 +0300
 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
 
 media-libs/jpeg-7 installs .so.7.0.0 so this causes some headacke for
 binary applications:
   
 Doesn't this mean you should slot it?
 
 No. I only want the .so.62 for binary apps, thus the ebuild won't
 install anything but the shared libs
You wrote a header was now private so it will probably make a lot of
ebuilds incompatible with 7.0. Maybe slotting could be useful even for them.

Mounir



Re: [gentoo-dev] New media-libs/jpeg-7 and how to deal with it.

2009-08-22 Thread Samuli Suominen
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
 No. I only want the .so.62 for binary apps, thus the ebuild won't
 install anything but the shared libs
 You wrote a header was now private so it will probably make a lot of
 ebuilds incompatible with 7.0. Maybe slotting could be useful even for them.

No.

The include was always private but we patched 6b to install it for a
ancient bug involving media-gfx/feh.



Re: [gentoo-dev] New media-libs/jpeg-7 and how to deal with it.

2009-08-22 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 22 August 2009 10:19:00 Samuli Suominen wrote:
 Mounir Lamouri wrote:
  No. I only want the .so.62 for binary apps, thus the ebuild won't
  install anything but the shared libs
 
  You wrote a header was now private so it will probably make a lot of
  ebuilds incompatible with 7.0. Maybe slotting could be useful even for
  them.

 No.

 The include was always private but we patched 6b to install it for a
 ancient bug involving media-gfx/feh.

sounds correct to me.  ABI change only - no SLOT.
-mike


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.