Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass)
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass modification today.
I'm sure spankman would make them if his tools did it for him, RIGHT SPANK?
-A
>
> On 05/20/2012 03:31 PM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
>>
>> vapier 12/05/20 12:31:33
>>
>> Modified: autotools.eclass
>> Log:
>> we don't use anything from eutils eclass now, so drop the inherit
>>
>> Revision Changes Path
>> 1.134 eclass/autotools.eclass
>>
>> file :
>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?rev=1.134&view=markup
>> plain:
>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?rev=1.134&content-type=text/plain
>> diff :
>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134
>>
>> Index: autotools.eclass
>> ===
>> RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass,v
>> retrieving revision 1.133
>> retrieving revision 1.134
>> diff -u -r1.133 -r1.134
>> --- autotools.eclass 20 May 2012 10:39:45 - 1.133
>> +++ autotools.eclass 20 May 2012 12:31:32 - 1.134
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>> # Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
>> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
>> -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass,v 1.133
>> 2012/05/20 10:39:45 vapier Exp $
>> +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass,v 1.134
>> 2012/05/20 12:31:32 vapier Exp $
>>
>> # @ECLASS: autotools.eclass
>> # @MAINTAINER:
>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
>> if [[ ${___ECLASS_ONCE_AUTOTOOLS} != "recur -_+^+_- spank" ]] ; then
>> ___ECLASS_ONCE_AUTOTOOLS="recur -_+^+_- spank"
>>
>> -inherit eutils libtool
>> +inherit libtool
>>
>> # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: WANT_AUTOCONF
>> # @DESCRIPTION:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass)
Am Sonntag 20 Mai 2012, 15:30:45 schrieb Nirbheek Chauhan: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:33:11 +0300 > > > > Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass modification > >> today. > > > > I will repeat once again: autogenerate them. > > +1 for this, seriously. Yes please. And forget about the difference between "user-oriented" and "dev-oriented". That's only an issue for people with too much time (also for debating). -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass)
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:33:11 +0300 > Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass modification >> today. > > I will repeat once again: autogenerate them. > +1 for this, seriously. -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass)
On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:33:11 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote: > ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass modification > today. I will repeat once again: autogenerate them. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
