Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On 05/07/2012 11:24 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I propose: REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit ) But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first place. It serves to convey meaning, such that a user who has disabled the qt USE flag will get a meaningful prompt if that flag is required for webkit support. This kind of information could be useful to some people, and it may be preferable to having a separate webkit-qt flag. ulm is right, it would still show up as an redudant USE flag as, the preferable result is that even KDE/Qt4 users get webkit-gtk installed if it's the rendering engine provided by the package. GTK+ is just graphical toolkit and not directly GNOME (like KDE users avoiding GNOME). By this same logic both USE=gtk qt4 are enabled in the desktop profile. I don't think we have any packages with *both* webkit-gtk and webkit-qt supports in tree (do we?).
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
So we have 31 packages that can optionally support webkit, and none of them lets you choose between the qt and gtk branches at compile time. I fail to see the benefit of splitting the flag. --- Jesús Guerrero Botella El 07/05/2012 05:16, Ben yng...@gmail.com escribió: On 7 May 2012 08:47, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com wrote: I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags. I don't think that is necessary. Ben | yngwin
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On 05/07/2012 04:00 AM, hasufell wrote: On 05/07/2012 02:47 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a): # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags. You mean that for example KDE users who set +webkit in make.conf would possibly get some weird gtk-deps too? KDE shouldn't be trying to avoid GTK+ in any case, as USE=gtk is enabled in the default desktop profile and is a graphical toolkit which may be the only graphical toolkit available for an package (and likely is). It's not like it's straightup GNOME. -1 for separating them
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On 05/06/2012 05:47 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a): # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags. Another possible way to model this kind of relationship would be to us REQUIRED_USE to enforce relationships with the qt and gtk flags: REQUIRED_USE=webkit? ( qt ) !webkit? ( !qt ) qt? ( webkit ) !qt? ( !webkit ) versus REQUIRED_USE=webkit? ( gtk ) !webkit? ( !gtk ) gtk? ( webkit ) !gtk? ( !webkit ) It's pretty awkward with the existing operators, but we could extend the REQUIRED_USE syntax to support an equivalent operator in a future EAPI. -- Thanks, Zac
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On Mon, 07 May 2012 11:11:04 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: REQUIRED_USE=webkit? ( qt ) !webkit? ( !qt ) qt? ( webkit ) !qt? ( !webkit ) Why do you need to write it both ways? It's pretty awkward with the existing operators, but we could extend the REQUIRED_USE syntax to support an equivalent operator in a future EAPI. If we're doing this, can we get it in EAPI 5 please, and not use workarounds in the tree until EAPI 5 is done? Getting the package mangler to come up with good error messages for REQUIRED_USE failures is a huge pain, and it gets worse the more clever tricks people come up with to get around its inexpressivity. I propose: REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit ) -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On Mon, 07 May 2012, Zac Medico wrote: Another possible way to model this kind of relationship would be to us REQUIRED_USE to enforce relationships with the qt and gtk flags: REQUIRED_USE=webkit? ( qt ) !webkit? ( !qt ) qt? ( webkit ) !qt? ( !webkit ) This line just says that either both webkit and qt must be set, or neither of them. In other words, that the ebuild has redundant flags, which IMHO should be avoided. versus REQUIRED_USE=webkit? ( gtk ) !webkit? ( !gtk ) gtk? ( webkit ) !gtk? ( !webkit ) It's pretty awkward with the existing operators, but we could extend the REQUIRED_USE syntax to support an equivalent operator in a future EAPI. As far as I can see, it is equivalent to: REQUIRED_USE=^^ ( webkit !qt ) (or analog for the gtk case). But see above. Ulrich
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On Mon, 7 May 2012 20:26:08 +0200 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: REQUIRED_USE=^^ ( webkit !qt ) Please provide an algorithm that will turn that into an appropriate error message for displaying to a user. -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On 05/07/2012 11:26 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: REQUIRED_USE=webkit? ( gtk ) !webkit? ( !gtk ) gtk? ( webkit ) !gtk? ( !webkit ) It's pretty awkward with the existing operators, but we could extend the REQUIRED_USE syntax to support an equivalent operator in a future EAPI. As far as I can see, it is equivalent to: REQUIRED_USE=^^ ( webkit !qt ) (or analog for the gtk case). But see above. Ah, that's right. This would another good example for the dev manual, like the one from bug 399069 [1]. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399069 -- Thanks, Zac
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I propose: REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit ) But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first place. Ulrich
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 11:11 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: On 05/06/2012 05:47 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a): # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags. Another possible way to model this kind of relationship would be to us REQUIRED_USE to enforce relationships with the qt and gtk flags: REQUIRED_USE=webkit? ( qt ) !webkit? ( !qt ) qt? ( webkit ) !qt? ( !webkit ) versus REQUIRED_USE=webkit? ( gtk ) !webkit? ( !gtk ) gtk? ( webkit ) !gtk? ( !webkit ) It's pretty awkward with the existing operators, but we could extend the REQUIRED_USE syntax to support an equivalent operator in a future EAPI. Isn't it the time to make a new EAPI which no longer has USE flags but USE values ? Many of the really weird USE flags combinations would be much more clearly expressed if the possible types for a USE variable were: 1) member-of: for choosing the backend of certain functionality; e.g. all combinations of USE=ssl openssl gnutls nss would become e.g. in the ebuild: USE=ssl=[member-of: openssl,gnutls,nss] in make-conf: USE: ssl=openssl, as synonymous of old USE=ssl openssl, or USE: ssl=none, as synonymous of old USE=-ssl 2) subset-of: for selecting a number of modules to build. This would replace USE_EXPAND quite neatly 3) boolean: as alias for member-of: [true,false] 4) unsigned int: IIRC some (few) packages can take optional uint at configure-time. for example with dev-lisp/sbcl one can customize some hardcoded GC parameters suchs as the default heap size, generation size, etc... In the above case, one could have a USE variable named webkit of type member-of: [qt,gtk] -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I propose: REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit ) But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first place. It serves to convey meaning, such that a user who has disabled the qt USE flag will get a meaningful prompt if that flag is required for webkit support. This kind of information could be useful to some people, and it may be preferable to having a separate webkit-qt flag. -- Thanks, Zac
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On 05/07/2012 12:33 PM, Stelian Ionescu wrote: Isn't it the time to make a new EAPI which no longer has USE flags but USE values ? Many of the really weird USE flags combinations would be much more clearly expressed if the possible types for a USE variable were: 1) member-of: for choosing the backend of certain functionality; e.g. all combinations of USE=ssl openssl gnutls nss would become e.g. in the ebuild: USE=ssl=[member-of: openssl,gnutls,nss] in make-conf: USE: ssl=openssl, as synonymous of old USE=ssl openssl, or USE: ssl=none, as synonymous of old USE=-ssl 2) subset-of: for selecting a number of modules to build. This would replace USE_EXPAND quite neatly 3) boolean: as alias for member-of: [true,false] 4) unsigned int: IIRC some (few) packages can take optional uint at configure-time. for example with dev-lisp/sbcl one can customize some hardcoded GC parameters suchs as the default heap size, generation size, etc... In the above case, one could have a USE variable named webkit of type member-of: [qt,gtk] We can get similar results using booleans with REQUIRED_USE, and your approach seems to introduce needless complexity. -- Thanks, Zac
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I propose: REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit ) But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first place. It serves to convey meaning, such that a user who has disabled the qt USE flag will get a meaningful prompt if that flag is required for webkit support. This kind of information could be useful to some people, and it may be preferable to having a separate webkit-qt flag. If 'qt' flag is required for webkit support, it's 'webkit? ( qt )'. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On 05/07/2012 01:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I propose: REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit ) But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first place. It serves to convey meaning, such that a user who has disabled the qt USE flag will get a meaningful prompt if that flag is required for webkit support. This kind of information could be useful to some people, and it may be preferable to having a separate webkit-qt flag. If 'qt' flag is required for webkit support, it's 'webkit? ( qt )'. What if '!webkit? ( !qt )' also applies though? As an alternative to listing both constraints separately, you could combine them as '^^ ( webkit !qt )', or add support for '== ( qt webkit )' to make the expression easier to read. -- Thanks, Zac
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: What if '!webkit? ( !qt )' also applies though? As an alternative to listing both constraints separately, you could combine them as '^^ ( webkit !qt )', or add support for '== ( qt webkit )' to make the expression easier to read. Forget easier to read. The important part is being able to produce error messages for users. -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On 05/06/2012 12:52 PM, Davide Pesavento wrote: On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:34 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module I suggest the following description: Add support for the WebKit HTML rendering/layout engine. Otherwise +1 from me. Thanks, Davide I took the liberty to apply the change. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285743 I have not changed all metadata.xml files, because quite a few of them have detailed descriptions on what the flag really does. I don't see a problem with that, so the maintainers should decide. There is still net-irc/kvirc which uses qt-webkit. I would suggest to change that to webkit like in net-irc/quassel (with pretty much the same description). Any reservations against that?
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 01:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I propose: REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit ) But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first place. It serves to convey meaning, such that a user who has disabled the qt USE flag will get a meaningful prompt if that flag is required for webkit support. This kind of information could be useful to some people, and it may be preferable to having a separate webkit-qt flag. If 'qt' flag is required for webkit support, it's 'webkit? ( qt )'. What if '!webkit? ( !qt )' also applies though? As an alternative to listing both constraints separately, you could combine them as '^^ ( webkit !qt )', or add support for '== ( qt webkit )' to make the expression easier to read. Then it's pointless to have the 'webkit' flag which doesn't control anything. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/07/2012 08:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 01:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I propose: REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit ) But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first place. It serves to convey meaning, such that a user who has disabled the qt USE flag will get a meaningful prompt if that flag is required for webkit support. This kind of information could be useful to some people, and it may be preferable to having a separate webkit-qt flag. If 'qt' flag is required for webkit support, it's 'webkit? ( qt )'. What if '!webkit? ( !qt )' also applies though? As an alternative to listing both constraints separately, you could combine them as '^^ ( webkit !qt )', or add support for '== ( qt webkit )' to make the expression easier to read. Then it's pointless to have the 'webkit' flag which doesn't control anything. Generalize the discussion to be about two abstract flags x and y that have the same kind of relationship, where each one actually does control something, but the two features are intertwined in a particular package such that they must both be enabled or disabled in unison. - -- Thanks, Zac -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+omdkACgkQ/ejvha5XGaO4CQCdGwcuuk4usnDj25nrcmd7D697 /TgAn3vXcPzEX3jCLhBVPPbnnX+lLWDW =G/eD -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On Mon, 07 May 2012 20:58:18 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/07/2012 08:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 01:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I propose: REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit ) But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first place. It serves to convey meaning, such that a user who has disabled the qt USE flag will get a meaningful prompt if that flag is required for webkit support. This kind of information could be useful to some people, and it may be preferable to having a separate webkit-qt flag. If 'qt' flag is required for webkit support, it's 'webkit? ( qt )'. What if '!webkit? ( !qt )' also applies though? As an alternative to listing both constraints separately, you could combine them as '^^ ( webkit !qt )', or add support for '== ( qt webkit )' to make the expression easier to read. Then it's pointless to have the 'webkit' flag which doesn't control anything. Generalize the discussion to be about two abstract flags x and y that have the same kind of relationship, where each one actually does control something, but the two features are intertwined in a particular package such that they must both be enabled or disabled in unison. Then please show me an example of that. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On 05/07/2012 09:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012 20:58:18 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/07/2012 08:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012 14:41:33 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 01:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2012 13:24:31 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 12:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: I propose: REQUIRED_USE=== ( qt webkit ) But this just means that the ebuild has redundant USE flags, so one of them shouldn't be in IUSE, in the first place. It serves to convey meaning, such that a user who has disabled the qt USE flag will get a meaningful prompt if that flag is required for webkit support. This kind of information could be useful to some people, and it may be preferable to having a separate webkit-qt flag. If 'qt' flag is required for webkit support, it's 'webkit? ( qt )'. What if '!webkit? ( !qt )' also applies though? As an alternative to listing both constraints separately, you could combine them as '^^ ( webkit !qt )', or add support for '== ( qt webkit )' to make the expression easier to read. Then it's pointless to have the 'webkit' flag which doesn't control anything. Generalize the discussion to be about two abstract flags x and y that have the same kind of relationship, where each one actually does control something, but the two features are intertwined in a particular package such that they must both be enabled or disabled in unison. Then please show me an example of that. I don't see any offhand. I guess it's fairly uncommon, or non-existent. -- Thanks, Zac
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/06/2012 02:55 AM, Ben wrote: On 6 May 2012 08:34, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module IIRC this was already voted on ~2 years ago (before I retired). It's just waiting for someone to implement it. See also bug #285743. Cheers, Ben | yngwin Any logs about that? I don't remember but to be honest there is nothing to discuss here. 33 packages are more than enough to justify a new global use flag. The description also looks good to me - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPpkSXAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LC5kIP/1WL9bcKcXdQS7/J47YrckNj //lv/7fBUdXwroF37b1snSzREflLNoaIhqPAqB6jukB0cApUMbRHEPuPARV/hro/ OWjCU6UfBYC6Sr8fiw98xeScKH1UitUj1PWArGdM0B6gM2RGY6PB1UR0FxRKZPrA 2abD3jRngvPjHkuCJ2iic6CAeo2C2NrX4lSSTsNNM4NNLqPh0Hc3OmUk/A/cp9jx 0z8U4PxoWTWxhFx9E2mkg2fE9Fsyf+/9gVVZpSml2RD2NVtk9Nw5S3acVlSrooX4 xpIL5hkQaU+a31ELa3cB9Hn3XUA5muAxLQwmkVTHF5srsRlFHjqF20IoCmLwt+oe dGg3uC4bxHw8lnnDzQMaP4NaZjkBRFaGYmE5Hb5V5k0ZTGmSm/DCj1TPGETLFJ/l K/CjDxsWmKJpaxAHEQD+VKqS8KiD6U3FrIoWfKsSNk+0Y+tDwCKaxuUDZjGvUZER jbJIQqmwaSD2GXQU1qEpoNn8Sjg9CpwNhwOiUjEIc/3To5vRFuIjgTYw4TdXw+JO z+ftLC/9SXeCkd1dfh7GwaoxKGOl2GoOdUpROmzaXjTGdaeAKoNHc0Y4Y4IZQr97 jYjraY11v/c53bYA+mi8lvlheOP9PPL1r5K/IqX270/xCXjMYn+3G57k3pJW3+Zc mv4iWudewyjJrLYSFQwU =RJdP -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:34 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module I suggest the following description: Add support for the WebKit HTML rendering/layout engine. Otherwise +1 from me. Thanks, Davide
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a): # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On 05/07/2012 02:47 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a): # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags. You mean that for example KDE users who set +webkit in make.conf would possibly get some weird gtk-deps too?
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
2012-05-07 03:00:31 hasufell napisał(a): On 05/07/2012 02:47 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2012-05-06 02:34:26 hasufell napisał(a): # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags. You mean that for example KDE users who set +webkit in make.conf would possibly get some weird gtk-deps too? 16 packages have webkit USE flag, which enables dependency on net-libs/webkit-gtk: app-misc/gramps app-office/gnucash app-pda/gtkpod app-text/xiphos dev-java/swt dev-util/geany-plugins dev-util/mono-tools gnome-extra/avant-window-navigator-extras gnome-extra/zenity mail-client/balsa media-gfx/gimp media-sound/gmusicbrowser media-sound/gpodder media-sound/rhythmbox net-im/empathy x11-misc/google-gadgets 15 packages have webkit USE flag, which enables dependency on x11-libs/qt-webkit: dev-python/PyQt4 dev-python/pyside kde-base/kget kde-base/perlqt kde-base/qtruby kde-base/qyoto kde-base/smokeqt net-im/psi net-im/qutim net-irc/quassel sci-chemistry/ball sci-geosciences/merkaartor x11-libs/qt-assistant x11-libs/qt-declarative x11-libs/qt-demo -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On 7 May 2012 08:47, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com wrote: I suggest to use separate qt-webkit (or webkit-qt) and webkit-gtk USE flags. I don't think that is necessary. Ben | yngwin
Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit
On 6 May 2012 08:34, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module IIRC this was already voted on ~2 years ago (before I retired). It's just waiting for someone to implement it. See also bug #285743. Cheers, Ben | yngwin
