Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs = dev-cpp moves
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote: There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp: I know it's a bit late for this, but I'm slowly catching up on my unread emails: dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C pre-processor? Can't categories contain the '+' char? e.g dev-c++? Sincerely, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs = dev-cpp moves
On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote: There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp: dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C pre-processor? Can't categories contain the '+' char? e.g dev-c++? we did relax the requirement on package names so they can contain '+' in them, but i think we should keep our unspoken anal rules about category names ... only alphanumeric and a single '-' -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs = dev-cpp moves
On 2005-05-09, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote: There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp: dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C pre-processor? Can't categories contain the '+' char? e.g dev-c++? we did relax the requirement on package names so they can contain '+' in them, but i think we should keep our unspoken anal rules about category names ... only alphanumeric and a single '-' -mike Might I suggest dev-cxx? CXX is a fairly common ASCIIfication of C++, after all. phil -- change name before @ to phil for email -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs = dev-cpp moves
On Monday 09 May 2005 02:23 pm, Phil Richards wrote: On 2005-05-09, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote: There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in dev-cpp: dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C pre-processor? Can't categories contain the '+' char? e.g dev-c++? we did relax the requirement on package names so they can contain '+' in them, but i think we should keep our unspoken anal rules about category names ... only alphanumeric and a single '-' -mike Might I suggest dev-cxx? CXX is a fairly common ASCIIfication of C++, after all. maybe, but cpp is almost as common and not really worth the hassle of a category rename -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
