Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] VCS used for development of portage

2010-03-05 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/05/10 04:58, Zac Medico wrote:
   http://git.goodpoint.de/?p=portage.git;a=summary

 NOTE: Do not use it for development, yet - it's a demo!
 
 It looks very nice to me. I noticed that it preserved continuity
 when branches got moved around, so the history seems like it will be
 fully intact. Great job!

Still, maybe we should not jump on this version yet:
- with svn2git we could split it to several repositories easily
  (see [1] for status you on related experiments)
- neither svn2git nor git-svn seem to support proper conversion of
  changes to svn:ignore

Summer of code could help about the latter:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code_2010_ideas#Add_support_for_svn:ignore_to_svn2git

But pushing the conversion further into the future could also be a
trade-off reducing efficiency and the number of contributions.

I don't feel like proposing anything on that matter at the moment.  With
that said: what do you and Robin think?



Sebastian


[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196025#c41



Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] VCS used for development of portage

2010-03-05 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:33:14PM +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
 I don't feel like proposing anything on that matter at the moment.  With
 that said: what do you and Robin think?
Here's a related question.

Did the previous CVS - SVN question generate the svn:ignore files from
.cvsignore, or simply discard them?

In either case, I'm starting to wonder if the change is just trivial
enough to get done in svn2git or git-svn directly. I think other
properties are already there.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee  Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85