Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Print WORKDIR & D sizes in build logs

2016-01-15 Thread Alexander Berntsen 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

testDoebuild
(portage.tests.ebuild.test_doebuild_fd_pipes.DoebuildFdPipesTestCase)...
FAIL

Travelling and stuff, but I'll try to look at it later; if you haven't
got to it by then.
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=HihE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Print WORKDIR & D sizes in build logs

2016-01-15 Thread Michał Górny 
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 23:58:42 +0100
Michał Górny  wrote:

> ---
>  bin/phase-functions.sh | 9 +
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

Pushed.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny



pgpEZVwgabBrA.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Print WORKDIR & D sizes in build logs

2016-01-15 Thread Michał Górny 
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:06:08 +0100
Alexander Berntsen  wrote:

> testDoebuild
> (portage.tests.ebuild.test_doebuild_fd_pipes.DoebuildFdPipesTestCase)...
> FAIL
> 
> Travelling and stuff, but I'll try to look at it later; if you haven't
> got to it by then.

You make it look like you noticed it before I pinged you about it! :-P

Looks like the test relies on the phase outputting only whatever's
inside. Not sure how to proceed best. Should I push all that output
into stderr maybe, as a workaround? Or disable printing sizes
conditionally to verboseness level?

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny



pgpi4SIoxo90i.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] portage.xml.metadata: Include maintainer type per GLEP 67

2016-01-15 Thread Michał Górny 
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:17:25 +0100
Michał Górny  wrote:

> ---
>  pym/portage/xml/metadata.py | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Pushed.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny



pgp87SFQapN3q.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Print WORKDIR & D sizes in build logs

2016-01-15 Thread Alexander Berntsen 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 15/01/16 15:21, Michał Górny wrote:
> You make it look like you noticed it before I pinged you about it! 
> :-P
It was just a note for myself to fix it later or at least see to that
someone else fixes it.

> Looks like the test relies on the phase outputting only whatever's
>  inside. Not sure how to proceed best. Should I push all that
> output into stderr maybe, as a workaround? Or disable printing
> sizes conditionally to verboseness level?
I think 2 sounds OK. But the test is meant to catch a regression on
fd_pipes; perhaps the test should be changed rather than the code.
What do you think, Zac?
- -- 
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=KngQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: filter out duplicate dependencies in error messages

2016-01-15 Thread Mike Frysinger 
On 04 Jan 2016 19:17, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> I immediately want to say REJECT!, REJECT!, REJECT!,...
> ...
> I would much prefer you re-base your patch on the rewrite code.

reject != delay ... i don't mind waiting and rebasing
-mike


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature