Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: fix runtime package mask interaction with slot operator rebuilds (bug 612094)

2017-03-09 Thread Zac Medico 
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Brian Dolbec  wrote:
> On Wed,  8 Mar 2017 22:11:45 -0800
> Zac Medico  wrote:
>
>> In some cases the backtracking runtime package mask can interact badly
>> with slot operator rebuilds, preventing a solution from being found.
>> This patch fixes the problem, which is demonstrated by the included
>> unit test.
>>
>> X-Gentoo-bug: 612094
>> X-Gentoo-bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612094
>> ---
>>  pym/_emerge/depgraph.py|  28 +++--
>>  .../test_slot_operator_runtime_pkg_mask.py | 136
>> + 2 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 12
>
>
> yeah, looks fine
> --
> Brian Dolbec 
>
>

Thanks, merged:

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=c01f3fbd23def329eb1d1b0fc8f79959119a8a82
-- 
Thanks,
Zac

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: fix runtime package mask interaction with slot operator rebuilds (bug 612094)

2017-03-09 Thread Brian Dolbec 
On Wed,  8 Mar 2017 22:11:45 -0800
Zac Medico  wrote:

> In some cases the backtracking runtime package mask can interact badly
> with slot operator rebuilds, preventing a solution from being found.
> This patch fixes the problem, which is demonstrated by the included
> unit test.
> 
> X-Gentoo-bug: 612094
> X-Gentoo-bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612094
> ---
>  pym/_emerge/depgraph.py|  28 +++--
>  .../test_slot_operator_runtime_pkg_mask.py | 136
> + 2 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 12


yeah, looks fine
-- 
Brian Dolbec