Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Move PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals?
On Mar 10, 2006, at 10:01 PM, Jason Stubbs wrote: On Saturday 11 March 2006 06:48, Kito wrote: On Mar 10, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Zac Medico wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, What do people think about moving PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals? Would the profiles not be a more logical place to set these? If not, can we twist the logic to make it so? :p The profiles would be able to override it. In the case of non- incrementals the first definition found is the winner in the order of: env -> make.conf -> make.defaults (profile) -> make.globals err, right..should've known that. Thanks for answering a silly question. --Kito -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Move PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals?
On Saturday 11 March 2006 06:48, Kito wrote: > > On Mar 10, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hello, > > > > What do people think about moving PORTAGE_INST_UID and > > PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals? > > Would the profiles not be a more logical place to set these? If not, > can we twist the logic to make it so? :p The profiles would be able to override it. In the case of non-incrementals the first definition found is the winner in the order of: env -> make.conf -> make.defaults (profile) -> make.globals -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Move PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals?
On Mar 10, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Zac Medico wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, What do people think about moving PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals? Would the profiles not be a more logical place to set these? If not, can we twist the logic to make it so? :p --Kito -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-portage-dev] Move PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
What do people think about moving PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to
make.globals? The variables are currently hard coded in ebuild.sh and it might
be useful to override the uid and gid via make.conf.
Zac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEEVRp/ejvha5XGaMRAmjQAKDVdPpgHH90AGQaZecSj/vMLatWOACdF8NR
9jcL5KUT9LRndtPZ+i3TKrE=
=BqTq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Index: cnf/make.globals
===
--- cnf/make.globals (revision 2838)
+++ cnf/make.globals (working copy)
@@ -60,6 +60,10 @@
# Disable auto-use
USE_ORDER="env:pkg:conf:defaults"
+PORTAGE_INST_UID="0"
+PORTAGE_INST_GID="0"
+
+
#*
#** DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE **
# ***
Index: bin/dosbin
===
--- bin/dosbin (revision 2838)
+++ bin/dosbin (working copy)
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
for x in "$@" ; do
if [[ -e ${x} ]] ; then
- install -m0755 -o 0 -g 0 "${x}" "${D}${DESTTREE}/sbin"
+ install -m0755 -o ${PORTAGE_INST_UID} -g ${PORTAGE_INST_GID} "${x}" "${D}${DESTTREE}/sbin"
else
echo "!!! ${0##*/}: ${x} does not exist" 1>&2
false
Index: bin/dobin
===
--- bin/dobin (revision 2838)
+++ bin/dobin (working copy)
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
for x in "$@" ; do
if [[ -e ${x} ]] ; then
- install -m0755 -o 0 -g 0 "${x}" "${D}${DESTTREE}/bin"
+ install -m0755 -o ${PORTAGE_INST_UID} -g ${PORTAGE_INST_GID} "${x}" "${D}${DESTTREE}/bin"
else
echo "!!! ${0##*/}: ${x} does not exist" 1>&2
false
Index: bin/ebuild.sh
===
--- bin/ebuild.sh (revision 2838)
+++ bin/ebuild.sh (working copy)
@@ -1017,10 +1017,6 @@
trap SIGINT SIGQUIT
}
-
-PORTAGE_INST_UID="0"
-PORTAGE_INST_GID="0"
-
dyn_install() {
[ -z "$PORTAGE_BUILDDIR" ] && die "${FUNCNAME}: PORTAGE_BUILDDIR is unset"
trap "abort_install" SIGINT SIGQUIT
