-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alec Warner wrote: > My only concern is about consistency. IE the portage backend (if I > recall correctly) should return all matching nodes; emerge would then > take that list and find the first one that matches in the vdb. However > it becomes a bit difficult sometimes because emerge may do this vdb > preference but say, portageq, may not.
emerge is supposed to be a high-level front-end though. If necessary, there's no reason why we can't add a portageq function that replicates emerge's "smart" category expansion. Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF+czj/ejvha5XGaMRAsh5AJ0YEO+NQ7BJ8CyjRFEhNUQXJuw5MACg0Cdp 2BtDRW7u8uOqspulqTw46Z0= =zur1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
