Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Making pax-utils a depend

2005-11-19 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Sunday 20 November 2005 12:46, Brian Harring wrote:
 On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 10:39:29PM -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
  On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 10:16 -0600, Brian Harring wrote:
  [snip]
 
   Still have issues with it- revdep-rebuild for example can't rely on
   NEEDED until a repository regen script is written.
 
  # How about something like this then?
 
  cd ${ROOT}/var/db/pkg || exit 1
 
  for f in *-*/*/CONTENTS ; do
  NEEDED=${f%/*}/NEEDED
  if [[ ! -e $NEEDED ]]; then
  grep ^obj $f | awk '{print $2}' | scanelf -BF%F %n -f -  
  $NEEDED
  fi
  done

 Aside from my inherint dislike of awk, algo is there.
 Should be schlopped into emaint though imo; you game, or want someone
 to do the python bits?

emaint needs the plugin stuff for that to happen, but yeah...

--
Jason Stubbs
-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Making pax-utils a depend

2005-11-18 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 04:41, solar wrote:
 For those of you that do not know we Mike Frysinger and myself have
 written a general purpose ELF Q/A tool called pax-utils

 The tool itself can be used to preform a number of tasks. What ferringb
 would like todo is take advantage of this tool for the an updated
 verify-rdepend code.

snip

 Before he does that does anybody have any objections? If so please let
 us know what and why.

The last I heard, Brian was the only one *against* having pax-utils added
to portage's RDEPEND list. ;)

--
Jason Stubbs
-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Making pax-utils a depend

2005-11-18 Thread Brian Harring
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 12:46:04AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
 On Wednesday 16 November 2005 04:41, solar wrote:
  For those of you that do not know we Mike Frysinger and myself have
  written a general purpose ELF Q/A tool called pax-utils
 
  The tool itself can be used to preform a number of tasks. What ferringb
  would like todo is take advantage of this tool for the an updated
  verify-rdepend code.
 
 snip
 
  Before he does that does anybody have any objections? If so please let
  us know what and why.
 
 The last I heard, Brian was the only one *against* having pax-utils added
 to portage's RDEPEND list. ;)
My issues were with NEEDED being auto-created when it's unused by 
portage, not specifically pax-utils.

Still have issues with it- revdep-rebuild for example can't rely on 
NEEDED until a repository regen script is written.

verify-rdepend doesn't need the repo to have all NEEDED keys filled 
though, so that facet of this problem isn't an issue for it.
~harring


pgp5gJ6eUjRZK.pgp
Description: PGP signature