Re: [gentoo-user] emerge uD world : gtk+-2.6.4-r1 failed!

2005-04-06 Thread Scott Jones
On Apr 6, 2005 12:40 PM, Bradley Serbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Ok, looks like the no such directory at the bottom, but I included abunch more incase I'm missing something else.../bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-O2 -mcpu=i686-pipe -Wall -o libpixbufloader-xpm.la -rpath/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders -avoid-version -moduleio-xpm.lolibgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lmlibtool: link: warning:`/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5/../../..//libgmodule-2.0.la'seems to be movedlibtool: link: warning:`/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5/../../..//libgobject-2.0.la'seems to be movedlibtool: link: warning:`/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5/../../..//libglib-2.0.la'seems to be movedi686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -shared.libs/io-xpm.o-Wl,--rpath-Wl,/var/tmp/portage/gtk+-2.6.4-r1/work/gtk+-2.6.4/gdk-pixbuf/.libs-L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5/../../.././.libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so -lm-mcpu=i686-Wl,-soname -Wl,libpixbufloader-xpm.so -o .libs/libpixbufloader-xpm.socreating libpixbufloader-xpm.la(cd .libs  rm -f libpixbufloader-xpm.la  ln -s../libpixbufloader-xpm.la libpixbufloader-xpm.la)if /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\GdkPixbuf\ -I.. -I..-I../gdk-pixbuf -I../gdk-pixbuf -DGTK_SYSCONFDIR=\/etc\-DGTK_VERSION=\2.6.4\ -DGTK_BINARY_VERSION=\2.4.0\-DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGDK_PIXBUF_DISABLE_DEPRECATED-DGTK_PREFIX=\/usr\-DG_DISABLE_CAST_CHECKS -pthread-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include-I/usr/include/libpng12-DGDK_PIXBUF_ENABLE_BACKEND-DPIXBUF_LIBDIR=\/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders\-DBUILT_MODULES_DIR=\./.libs\ -O2 -mcpu=i686 -pipe -Wall -MTio-tiff.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/io-tiff.Tpo \-c -o io-tiff.lo `test -f 'io-tiff.c' || echo './'`io-tiff.c; \then mv -f .deps/io-tiff.Tpo .deps/io-tiff.Plo; \else rm -f .deps/io-tiff.Tpo; exit 1; \fi i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..-DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\GdkPixbuf\ -I.. -I.. -I../gdk-pixbuf -I../gdk-pixbuf-DGTK_SYSCONFDIR=\/etc\ -DGTK_VERSION=\2.6.4\-DGTK_BINARY_VERSION=\2.4.0\ -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED-DGDK_PIXBUF_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGTK_PREFIX=\/usr\-DG_DISABLE_CAST_CHECKS -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libpng12-DGDK_PIXBUF_ENABLE_BACKEND-DPIXBUF_LIBDIR=\/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders\-DBUILT_MODULES_DIR=\./.libs\ -O2 -mcpu=i686 -pipe -Wall -MTio-tiff.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/io-tiff.Tpo -c io-tiff.c-fPIC -DPIC -o.libs/io-tiff.o/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-O2 -mcpu=i686-pipe -Wall -o libpixbufloader-tiff.la -rpath/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders -avoid-version -moduleio-tiff.lo -ltifflibgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lmgrep: //usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5/libstdc++.la: No suchfile or directory/bin/sed: can't read//usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5/libstdc++.la: No such file ordirectorylibtool: link: `//usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5/libstdc++.la'is not a valid libtool archiveJason Cooper wrote:Bradley Serbu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled:make[4]: *** [libpixbufloader-tiff.la] Error 1make[4]: Leaving directory`/var/tmp/portage/gtk+-2.6.4-r1/work/gtk+-2.6.4/gdk-pixbuf'make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1make[3]: Leaving directory`/var/tmp/portage/gtk+-2.6.4-r1/work/gtk+-2.6.4/gdk-pixbuf'make[2]: *** [all] Error 2make[2]: Leaving directory`/var/tmp/portage/gtk+-2.6.4-r1/work/gtk+-2.6.4/gdk-pixbuf'make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gtk+-2.6.4-r1/work/gtk+-2.6.4'make: *** [all] Error 2!!! ERROR: x11-libs/gtk+-2.6.4-r1 failed.!!! Function src_compile, Line 84, Exitcode 2!!! (no error message)!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this statusmessage.Need about 20 more lines above what you got.make is just relaying anerror message from somewhere...Cooper.--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing listBradely,

Before you go any further try running fix_libtool_files.sh. I
think this probably will fix your problem. Run the script without
any arguments for instructions on its use.

Scott Jones

p.s. This is a very common problem, so may I recommend a search
focusing on the not a valid libtool archive part of the error message

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage downgrading question

2005-04-06 Thread Scott Jones
On Apr 6, 2005 1:12 PM, David D. Rea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi All-I needed to fill out a PDF form today, so I figured I'd try the new AdobeAcrobat Reader 7. I did the following:`ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge -pv acroread`And subsequently emerged the package without the -pv. All went well, andacroread seems to work happily enough on my box. I'm impressed with thesoftware, I just wish it was open-source.So now I'd like to do an `emerge -pvuD world` to clear up a few GLSAs thathave come across in the last few days. Alas, this is among the output:[ebuild UD] app-text/acroread-5.10 [7.0] -cjk -noplugin 9,068 kB`man emerge` explains well enough why it's trying to downgrade acroread.The only place I can find some semblance of a recommendation to preventthis behavior is here:http://users.dslextreme.com/~craig.lawson/linux_notes/gentoo_portage.htmlWhere the author suggests modifying /var/lib/portage/world so that thepackage reads:=app-text/acroread-7.0But doing this doesn't change emerge's behavior when doing an `emerge-pvuD world`. It still tries to downgrade acroread.???Thanks,Dave--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing listDave,

I believe that

echo =app-text/acroread-7.0 ~x86  /etc/portage/package.keywords

will fix your problem. Basically you put programs you want to
have masked ~x86 in the file package.keywords in the directory
/etc/portage

Scott Jones


Re: [gentoo-user] emerge uD world : gtk+-2.6.4-r1 failed!

2005-04-06 Thread Scott Jones
On Apr 6, 2005 1:41 PM, Bradley Serbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:brads $ sudo fix_libtool_files.sh 3.3.5 * Scanning libtool files for hardcoded gcc library paths...Tried this and the command ran successfully, but didn't fix the error.- BradChristoph Gysin wrote:Bradley Serbu wrote:Ok, looks like the no such directory at the bottom, but I included abunch more incase I'm missing something else...grep: //usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5/libstdc++.la: No suchfile or directory/bin/sed: can't read//usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5/libstdc++.la: No such file ordirectorylibtool: link: `//usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5/libstdc++.la'is not a valid libtool archiveThe bug was an incorrect gcc version check in an eclass. The followingline should solve your problem.$ fix_libtool_files.sh 3.3.5Christoph--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing listBradley,

I always search the forums and bugzilla, but it is really all about
figuring out what to search for. I think if you recently upgraded
gcc, since you appear to running gcc 3.3.5 you may have to run
fix_libtool_files-sh 3.3.4. I have not had the problem you are
running into since I upgraded to 3.3.5. Anyways I hope this helps.

Scott Jones

Re: [gentoo-user] Multiple simultaneous emerges

2005-03-28 Thread Scott Jones
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:22:26 -0800, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is there anything wrong with multiple simultaneous emerges?
 
 - Grant
 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 
 
Grant

If you search gmail (it being that you save these mails) ...I am
pretty sure you will find a post by Ciaran (damn dont rip my head off
C. if I spelled your name wrong) that says it is bad and it all boils
down to cache.  So I wouldn't do it but if you really want to
understand why ask ciaran and risk his wrath...

Scott Jones
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] search emerge

2005-02-27 Thread Scott Jones
emerge eix

http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=67849

from this thread, is much faster than esearch IMHO.

 Scott Jones


On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:54:20 +, Ricardo Serrano Salazar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 emerge esearch
 
 esearch is very fast and you use the same options than emerge to
 search, you have just to forget emerge sync and using esync or doing
 eupdatedb periodically
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] unable to su anymore

2005-02-27 Thread Scott Jones
Is your user still in the wheel group?

That is the only thing you are supposed to modify to be able to su ( I think)

Scott Jones


On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:15:50 +0100, lolox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 After updating system and world, I can't su anymore.
 when I try su, I get :
 
 su: Permission denied
 Sorry.
 
 any idea ?
 
 lolox.
 
 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Still can't update xfce

2005-02-21 Thread Scott Jones
Jim,

You have to uninstall the package which is causing the Block... in this case :
[blocks B ] xfce-base/xfce4-base (from pkg xfce-base/xfce4-4.2.0)

then you should be able to merge whatever packages it was blocking. 
For more in depth info go to forums, I know there are threads
discussing blocks there also.

   Scott Jones




On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:50:27 +, Jim Hatfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:00:40 -, in local.gentoo.users you wrote:
 
 Don't know much about that gtk thingy, but for the block thing you can
 always
 do some
 emerge --uD --tree world, which possibly shows which package still
 
 Well here are the results:
 
 terminator root # emerge -uD --tree world
  --tree implies --pretend... adding --pretend to options.
 
 These are the packages that I would merge, in reverse order:
 
 Calculating world dependencies ...done!
 [blocks B ] xfce-base/xfce4-base (from pkg xfce-base/xfce4-4.2.0)
 [nomerge  ] app-admin/metalog-0.8_pre20031130
 [ebuild U ]  dev-libs/libpcre-5.0 [4.5]
 [nomerge  ] net-misc/ntp-4.2.0-r2
 [ebuild U ]  sys-libs/libcap-1.10-r5 [1.10-r4]
 [nomerge  ] mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-1.0
 [ebuild U ]  net-www/mozilla-launcher-1.23 [1.22]
 [nomerge  ] sys-apps/vixie-cron-4.1-r4
 [ebuild U ]  mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61 [2.60.9]
 [ebuild U ]   net-mail/mailbase-0.00-r8 [0.00-r6]
 [ebuild U ] media-gfx/gimp-print-4.2.7 [4.2.6]
 [ebuild U ]  media-gfx/imagemagick-6.1.8.8 [6.1.3.4]
 [nomerge  ] app-text/xpdf-3.00-r8
 [ebuild U ]  x11-libs/openmotif-2.2.3-r1 [2.1.30-r6]
 [ebuild U ] xfce-base/xfce4-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]  xfce-base/xffm-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]  xfce-extra/xfce4-systray-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]  xfce-extra/xfce4-iconbox-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild  N]  xfce-extra/xfce4-icon-theme-4.2.0
 [ebuild U ]  xfce-extra/xfce4-toys-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [nomerge  ] net-fs/samba-3.0.10
 [ebuild U ]  xfce-base/xfprint-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild  N]  xfce-extra/xfce4-appfinder-4.2.0
 [ebuild  N]  xfce-base/xfce4-session-4.2.0
 [ebuild U ]   xfce-base/xfce-utils-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]  xfce-extra/xfwm4-themes-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]  xfce-base/xfdesktop-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]  xfce-extra/xfce4-trigger-launcher-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]  xfce-base/xfwm4-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]  xfce-extra/xfce4-mixer-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]  xfce-extra/xfcalendar-4.2.0 [0.1.9]
 [ebuild U ]   xfce-base/xfce4-panel-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]xfce-base/xfce-mcs-plugins-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ] xfce-base/xfce-mcs-manager-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]  xfce-base/libxfce4mcs-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]   xfce-base/libxfcegui4-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]xfce-base/libxfce4util-4.2.0 [4.0.6]
 [ebuild U ]   x11-themes/gtk-engines-xfce-2.2.5 [2.1.7]
 [nomerge  ] app-office/dia-0.93
 [ebuild U ]  x11-libs/gtk+-2.4.14 [2.4.13-r1]
 [nomerge  ] x11-terms/xterm-197
 [nomerge  ]  sys-apps/utempter-0.5.5.5-r1
 [nomerge  ]   x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.0-r4
 [ebuild U ]x11-base/opengl-update-2.0_pre5 [2.0_pre4-r1]
 [nomerge  ] media-sound/alsa-utils-1.0.6
 [ebuild U ]  sys-apps/pciutils-2.1.11-r3 [2.1.11-r1]
 [nomerge  ] sys-apps/man-pages-2.01
 [nomerge  ]  sys-apps/man-1.5p
 [nomerge  ]   sys-apps/sed-4.0.9
 [nomerge  ]sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1
 [nomerge  ] sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5-r1
 [nomerge  ]  sys-libs/ncurses-5.4-r5
 [ebuild  N]   sys-libs/gpm-1.20.1
 
 I'm not an emerge expert, I can't tell from the above where the
 problem lies.
 
 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -e, skip ahead?

2005-02-21 Thread Scott Jones
Jesse,

This is a semi-solution, perhaps try pye (pick your emerge) from this discussion
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=135968, it might work but
then again it might not

  Scott Jones


On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:47:24 -0500, Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Monday 21 February 2005 12:31 pm, you wrote:
  Jesse Guardiani wrote:
 
  Hello,
  
  I'm using 'emerge -e' to rebuild all of my 537
  packages with new make.conf settings.
  (-march=i686 instead of -march=pentium3)
  
  Unfortunately, since this is such a long emerge
  operation, there is a huge possibility for
  interruptions. Moore's Law is a way of life for
  me. I had a power failure last night on this
  machine after already compiling 147 packages.
  
  Is there any way I can trick portage into starting
  on package # 147 in a 537 package `emerge -e world`
  operation?
  
  Thanks!
  
  
  Just do:
 
  emerge --resume
 
 I don't think that works with -e. I tried it and got
 an error message stating that there was nothing to
 resume. I think --resume only resumes individual emerges,
 not batch operations.
 
 Either that or it doesn't work after a reboot
 
 --
 Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
 WingNET Internet Services,
 P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
 423-559-LINK (v)  423-559-5145 (f)
 http://www.wingnet.net
 
 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Deleting /var/tmp/portage/*

2003-08-24 Thread Scott Jones
On 03:02 Sun 24 Aug, Lloyd I Freese Jr wrote:
 On Sunday 24 August 2003 02:56 am, Dmitry Suzdalev wrote:
  Hello gentooers!
 
  A short question: Is it safe to wipe out contents of /var/tmp/portage
  directory?
 
  Quick searching in docs didnt give me an answer (perhaps that's because I'm
  too sleepy now).
 
  Thanks in advance for answers.
 
  Dmitry.
 
 
 Don't really know if it's offically okay but I've done it before without 
 anything blowing up. YMMV though
 -- 
 It's not easy being green. It takes way more food coloring than you'd think.

I did this rm -rf /var/tmp/portage* today and i got rid of like 15 gigs of stuff 
because of some setting in my make.conf (keepwrk,keeptemp, noclean)

I think it is safe rac told me how to do it on IRC

Scott Jones
 
 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list