Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -f

2007-05-22 Thread Naga
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 07:42:57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So, does the emptytree (-e) option basically tell it that you don't
 have ANYTHING instlled where it should be? :P

Yes, it empties the depend tree. So portage thinks that no software is 
installed.

-- 
Naga
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 07:01 +0200, Naga wrote:


 According to some devs on -dev (IRC) last night about 50 GiB if you want 
 _all_ 
 distfiles.

hm, it has been a while since I last read the handbook.  There were a
small number of files to rsync back then :)

-- 
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs.  The trick is to make one with none.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -f

2007-05-22 Thread Dale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 So, does the emptytree (-e) option basically tell it that you don't
 have ANYTHING instlled where it should be? :P

   

Well, if you do a emerge -e world, it will recompile everything on your
system.  I do mean everything.  On mine it takes a little over 48
hours.  That is usually only done to fix something as a last resort or
when upgrading gcc.

That help?

Dale

:-)  :-)  :-)

-- 
www.myspace.com/-remove-me-dalek1967

Copy n paste then remove the -remove-me- part.



Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Naga
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 07:39:55 Iain Buchanan wrote:
 On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 07:01 +0200, Naga wrote:
  According to some devs on -dev (IRC) last night about 50 GiB if you want
  _all_ distfiles.

Found it :)

A-How much space does a distfiles mirror need?
B-58G
B-well, that's what it needs actually, probably in the docs it has it 
specified
C-i'll check that actual present usage for you, one sec
C-distfiles/ right now is 44Gb going out
C-historical distfiles since early 2005 is ~150Gb

(A,B,C == anon devs :))

 hm, it has been a while since I last read the handbook.  There were a
 small number of files to rsync back then :)

or it was refering to the use of http-replicator (local http-mirror for use as 
distfiles mirror on LAN)

-- 
Naga
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ok,  Here goes...


 How large is the package archive for gentoo, assuming a full copy of the
 portage tree, and all of the source tarballs in the distfiles directory
 of the average server?

dunno, but huge.


 Would it be possible to draw down the whole archive all in one shot
 using wget or similar, dump it all into a directory on the hard drive,
 and direct portage there for the distribution files?

yes, choose a mirror. download the complete distfiles dir of that mirror. wget 
can do that.


 I know this would basically be equivelent to making a local mirror of
 the distrservers, and I would have to make sure that my portage tree
 matches up to the files actually on the hard drive. ^^  What other
 concerns would I need to look at at this point. :P

you will waste a lot of bandwidth and diskspace. The mirror might hate you for 
it. You will have lots and lots of packages like packageX.1.1, 
packageX.1.1.0, packageX.1.1.1
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk


 -Original Message-
 From: Hemmann, Volker Armin 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 3:34 PM
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question
 
 
 On Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Ok,  Here goes...
 
 
  How large is the package archive for gentoo, assuming a 
 full copy of 
  the portage tree, and all of the source tarballs in the distfiles 
  directory of the average server?
 
 dunno, but huge.
 snip
 you will waste a lot of bandwidth and diskspace. The mirror 
 might hate you for 
 it. You will have lots and lots of packages like packageX.1.1, 
 packageX.1.1.0, packageX.1.1.1
 -- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

I think that a better option may be to decide which software I want,
and use emerge -ef package on each of the big packages to get just
what I need.  Maybe setting up a stage three install, with just the
kernel, boot loader, and portage and using 'emerge -ef world' first
might have the desired effect as far as getting the base system first.

:-)

That would also let me make sure that I have an up to date portage tree,
and just the files I need and maybe a few more. ^^;;

Does that sound better, and less likely to piss off the mirrors? :P

---
Ken


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] OT: Linux (Ubuntu) on a USB drive doesn't save

2007-05-22 Thread Daevid Vincent
I have an ancient Gateway 200ARC sans notebook hard drive (amongst other
things). I don't have the stupid little ribbon cable so I can't install
one either. And they charge like $50 for one. The notebook was free,
and a 1GB USB stick is only $20. a 2GB is like $40.

I wanted to install Linux on it to use it as an always-on thin client
that can just monitor some webpages, and do a few other basic tasks.

I followed this guide:
http://www.pendrivelinux.com/2007/02/12/usb-ubuntu-tutorial-for-linux-us
ers/#more-117

And used Ubuntu 7.04. It worked great. I can boot and get online and all
sorts of things.

However, nothing saves !!!? As in nothing is persistent. I can create
the file and see it in the directory, edit it, and all that jazz. But
upon a reboot, it's gone!?

I created a .vimrc and rebooted and it's gone!
I apt-get install some apps and they're not there now.
I save my gnome settings. Revert back each time I reboot.

So what am I missing? Am I retarded and you can't use a 1GB USB stick as
a real hard drive like that?

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  -Original Message-
  From: Hemmann, Volker Armin
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 3:34 PM
  To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
  Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question
 
  On Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Ok,  Here goes...
  
  
   How large is the package archive for gentoo, assuming a
 
  full copy of
 
   the portage tree, and all of the source tarballs in the distfiles
   directory of the average server?
 
  dunno, but huge.

  snip

  you will waste a lot of bandwidth and diskspace. The mirror
  might hate you for
  it. You will have lots and lots of packages like packageX.1.1,
  packageX.1.1.0, packageX.1.1.1
  --
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

 I think that a better option may be to decide which software I want,
 and use emerge -ef package on each of the big packages to get just
 what I need.  Maybe setting up a stage three install, with just the
 kernel, boot loader, and portage and using 'emerge -ef world' first
 might have the desired effect as far as getting the base system first.

 :-)

 That would also let me make sure that I have an up to date portage tree,
 and just the files I need and maybe a few more. ^^;;

 Does that sound better, and less likely to piss off the mirrors? :P

yes ;)

but why not set 'parallel-fetch' in your make.conf? That way portage should 
download packages, while compiling?
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Linux (Ubuntu) on a USB drive doesn't save

2007-05-22 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 23:44 -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote:
[snip]
 I followed this guide:
 http://www.pendrivelinux.com/2007/02/12/usb-ubuntu-tutorial-for-linux-us
 ers/#more-117
 
 And used Ubuntu 7.04. It worked great. I can boot and get online and all
 sorts of things.
 
 However, nothing saves !!!?

I'm not qualified to answer this question because I've never used
Ubuntu; I've never booted from a usb key; and I'm on the gentoo-user
ml ;) buuut maybe the usb key boot idea works like a live-cd and loads
your filesystem into a RAM disk?  In which case, changed you made
wouldn't actually be saved...  you could add another partition to the
key for persistent storage perhaps?

HTH,
-- 
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au

We are each entitled to our own opinion, but no one is entitled to his
own facts.
-- Patrick Moynihan

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk


 -Original Message-
 From: Hemmann, Volker Armin 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 4:02 PM
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question


 snip

  That would also let me make sure that I have an up to date portage 
  tree, and just the files I need and maybe a few more. ^^;;
 
  Does that sound better, and less likely to piss off the mirrors? :P
 
 yes ;)
 
 but why not set 'parallel-fetch' in your make.conf? That way 
 portage should 
 download packages, while compiling?
 -- 

The next computer I build will likely be a dual core (an X2 most
likely),
so that may be an excellent option. :P

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Dan Farrell
On Tue, 22 May 2007 16:13:11 +0900
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Hemmann, Volker Armin 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 4:02 PM
  To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
  Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question
 
 
  snip
 
   That would also let me make sure that I have an up to date
   portage tree, and just the files I need and maybe a few more. ^^;;
  
   Does that sound better, and less likely to piss off the
   mirrors? :P
  
  yes ;)
  
  but why not set 'parallel-fetch' in your make.conf? That way 
  portage should 
  download packages, while compiling?
  -- 
 
 The next computer I build will likely be a dual core (an X2 most
 likely),
 so that may be an excellent option. :P
 
I don't think you'll need much processing power to parallel-fetch.  I
do it on every computer with a fast enough internet connection.  The
real limit is disk and network for downloading, not at all processor.  
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk


 -Original Message-
 From: Dan Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 4:27 PM
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question
 
 
 On Tue, 22 May 2007 16:13:11 +0900
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip

  
  The next computer I build will likely be a dual core (an X2 most 
  likely), so that may be an excellent option. :P
  
 I don't think you'll need much processing power to 
 parallel-fetch.  I do it on every computer with a fast enough 
 internet connection.  The real limit is disk and network for 
 downloading, not at all processor.  
 -- 

I think RAM is an issue also.  I have been messing with a laptop with
512MB 
of ram, and it is nowhere near as quick as what I am used too. ^^;;
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 22 May 2007 16:42:38 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I don't think you'll need much processing power to 
  parallel-fetch.  I do it on every computer with a fast enough 
  internet connection.  The real limit is disk and network for 
  downloading, not at all processor.  

 I think RAM is an issue also.  I have been messing with a laptop with
 512MB 
 of ram, and it is nowhere near as quick as what I am used too. ^^;;

parallel-fetch needs significant amounts of neither RAM nor CPU power,
all it needs is enough to run an instance of wget in the background.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Committee (noun): A life form with six or more legs and no brain.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 22 May 2007 03:07:57 -0500, »Q« wrote:

 If you populate your world file first (by hand if you like), then one
 emerge -ef world should get you all the files you might need.

That won't work, portage will complain that there is a problem with our
world file and bail out. Put the packages you want in a file like world
then do emerge -ef $(cat myworld).


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Boss spelled backwards is double-SOB


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Amarok, track length and moodbar problem...

2007-05-22 Thread vladimir

On 5/22/07, Nistor Andrei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but i'm experiencing some
weird behaviour in Amarok. The problem is that with some songs the length is
not displayed. I'm unable to scroll forwards or backwards in the song, and
moodbar does not work on those songs either. Do you have any idea why this
is
happening? I've attached a screenshot...


I have the same problem: some song's length uncknown and they are unscollable.
I'm NOT using moodbar, and using xine engine.

When I'm trying to play this tracks with mplayer, it shows some
errors, so I assume this tracks is a bit damaged.
I heard about some mp3 repair tool.

--
Vladimir Rusinov
GreenMice Solutions: IT-решения на базе Linux
http://greenmice.info/


Re: [gentoo-user] cannot emerge sys-block/nbd

2007-05-22 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi,

On Mon, 21 May 2007 22:38:48 -0400 Michael George
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am trying to emerge sys-block/nbd for my LTSP system.  I get the
 error:
 configure: error: Could not find an nbd.h from 2.6 or above.

What's the version of your linux-headers package?

 But locate nbd.h gives me:
 /usr/include/linux/nbd.h

That should be it.

 I'm using gcc 4.1.2, if that makes a difference.
 
 Anyone else have this trouble?

Nope, compiles like a charm. I think you're probably having old headers
in /usr/include/linux, maybe for LTSP.

-hwh
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Amarok, track length and moodbar problem...

2007-05-22 Thread Paul Stear
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 11:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 5/22/07, Nistor Andrei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but i'm experiencing some
  weird behaviour in Amarok. The problem is that with some songs the length
  is not displayed. I'm unable to scroll forwards or backwards in the song,
  and moodbar does not work on those songs either. Do you have any idea why
  this is
  happening? I've attached a screenshot...

 I have the same problem: some song's length uncknown and they are
 unscollable. I'm NOT using moodbar, and using xine engine.

 When I'm trying to play this tracks with mplayer, it shows some
 errors, so I assume this tracks is a bit damaged.
 I heard about some mp3 repair tool.
Hi,
Amarok has an mp3 fixer, click on Tools Script manager and I have mp3 fixer 
listed under General, but I might have downloaded it using Get more scripts 
button.
Hope this helps, its fixed a few with length problems for me.
Paul
-- 
This message has been sent using kmail with gentoo linux
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 08:30:44 Naga wrote:
 B-well, that's what it needs actually, probably in the docs it has it
 specified

http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/source_mirrors.xml

-- 
Bo Andresen


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -f

2007-05-22 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 08:01:19 Naga wrote:
  So, does the emptytree (-e) option basically tell it that you don't
  have ANYTHING instlled where it should be? :P

 Yes, it empties the depend tree. So portage thinks that no software is
 installed.

That's an implementation detail that used to be true but isn't any longer. 
That's why it no longer says [ebuild  N] for all packages with -e. 
Doing so caused problems with circular dependencies.

It just remerges everything in world and all their dependencies. Calling 
it 'everything'  is wrong too as it doesn't do anything with packages that 
aren't in world or a dependency of something in world.

-- 
Bo Andresen


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Dan Farrell
On Tue, 22 May 2007 08:34:16 +0200
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Ok,  Here goes...
 
 
  How large is the package archive for gentoo, assuming a full copy
  of the portage tree, and all of the source tarballs in the
  distfiles directory of the average server?
 
Bigger than you want to download, that 's almost guaranteed.  
 
  I know this would basically be equivelent to making a local mirror
  of the distrservers, and I would have to make sure that my portage
  tree matches up to the files actually on the hard drive. ^^  What
  other concerns would I need to look at at this point. :P
 
 you will waste a lot of bandwidth and diskspace. The mirror might
 hate you for it. You will have lots and lots of packages like
 packageX.1.1, packageX.1.1.0, packageX.1.1.1
Not to mention you will spend much longer waiting for everything to
download then you'd have to wait for everything do download on demand.
It would probably be more desirable for you to keep a network-shared
distfiles than mirror the servers.  Then there's the age-old 'static
hosts file' problem - just like the giant host file describing everyone
took longer to transfer than to become outdated back in the glorious
days of UNIX, it will also probably take longer to dowload all
distfiles ever than it will for those distfiles to become outdated.  In
conclusion, I think this is a rather silly idea. 
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Amarok, track length and moodbar problem...

2007-05-22 Thread Nistor Andrei
On Tuesday 22 May 2007, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
 On Montag, 21. Mai 2007, Nistor Andrei wrote:
  Hello list,
 
  I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but i'm experiencing some
  weird behaviour in Amarok. The problem is that with some songs the length
  is not displayed. I'm unable to scroll forwards or backwards in the song,
  and moodbar does not work on those songs either. Do you have any idea why
  this is happening? I've attached a screenshot...

 moodbar? isn't it hardmasked and highly experimental?

It's in ~x86

 and the rest of your problems: which backend are you using?

The xine backend.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Amarok, track length and moodbar problem...

2007-05-22 Thread Nistor Andrei
On Tuesday 22 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have the same problem: some song's length uncknown and they are
 unscollable. I'm NOT using moodbar, and using xine engine.
I think my tracks are fine, mplayer doesn't display any errors about them...
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Linux (Ubuntu) on a USB drive doesn't save

2007-05-22 Thread Daniel da Veiga

On 5/22/07, Daevid Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I followed this guide:
http://www.pendrivelinux.com/2007/02/12/usb-ubuntu-tutorial-for-linux-us
ers/#more-117


Reading that, I wonder where Gentoo fits in... It even uses a Ubuntu
LiveCD to CREATE the system...


However, nothing saves !!!? As in nothing is persistent. I can create
the file and see it in the directory, edit it, and all that jazz. But
upon a reboot, it's gone!?


I never used Ubuntu, neither tried this tutorial, but I've read it,
and there's something about a read/write partition being used to
retain stuff you change, are you sure you followed the guide
completely, including making and formatting that special partition?

--
Daniel da Veiga
Computer Operator - RS - Brazil
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V-
PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] ssh Failed to add the host to the list of known hosts

2007-05-22 Thread Denis

For some reason, my SSH (openssh-4.5_p1-r1) refuses to remember any
hosts I connect to, and even if I keep connecting to the same machine
over and over, it still wants me to OK the RSA fingerprint manually.

Here's the verbose output when I try to connect to a known machine:

ssh -v XX.xx.xxx
OpenSSH_4.5p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8d 28 Sep 2006
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: Connecting to XX.xx.xxx [xxx.xxx.xx.xx] port 22.
debug1: Connection established.
debug1: identity file /home/myuser/.ssh/identity type -1
debug1: identity file /home/myuser/.ssh/id_rsa type -1
debug1: identity file /home/myuser/.ssh/id_dsa type -1
debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version OpenSSH_3.5p1
debug1: match: OpenSSH_3.5p1 pat OpenSSH_3.*
debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.5
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
debug1: kex: server-client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none
debug1: kex: client-server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(102410248192) sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY
The authenticity of host 'XX.xx.xxx (xxx.xxx.xx.xx)' can't be
established.
RSA key fingerprint is (SOME RSA KEY GOES HERE)
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes

Failed to add the host to the list of known hosts
(/home/myuser/.ssh/known_hosts).

debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
debug1: Authentications that can continue:
publickey,password,keyboard-interactive
debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
debug1: Trying private key: /home/myuser/.ssh/identity
debug1: Trying private key: /home/myuser/.ssh/id_rsa
debug1: Trying private key: /home/myuser/.ssh/id_dsa
debug1: Next authentication method: keyboard-interactive
debug1: Authentications that can continue:
publickey,password,keyboard-interactive
debug1: Next authentication method: password

It would not create any files under my /home/myuser/.ssh/ directory.
When I tried to create a file there manually, it said permission
denied.

Do I need to be added to some group to fix these permissions?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ssh Failed to add the host to the list of known hosts

2007-05-22 Thread Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Denis wrote:
 Do I need to be added to some group to fix these permissions?

ls -ld /home/username/.ssh should say that the dir belongs to username, and 
have rwx permissions
for it. You probably moved your home directory using root, or something like 
that.

chown username: /home/username/.ssh
chown username: /home/username/.ssh/*
chmod 700 /home/username/.ssh
chmod 600 /home/username.ssh/*

do that with root if you can.

- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad Informatica
OpenPGP for HTTP: New Web-Auth Scheme: http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/2599
Consulting and Secure Mail Hosting: http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGU0MzAlpOsGhXcE0RCpF1AJwK79lu6W5Nl7KTFIwFBcC/hI7o5wCfa29s
ZxaW7vdWIwXwF/MYSSD5FCo=
=ZoZu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Linux (Ubuntu) on a USB drive doesn't save

2007-05-22 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 08:13, Iain Buchanan wrote:
 On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 23:44 -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote:
 [snip]

  I followed this guide:
  http://www.pendrivelinux.com/2007/02/12/usb-ubuntu-tutorial-for-linux-us
  ers/#more-117
 
  And used Ubuntu 7.04. It worked great. I can boot and get online and all
  sorts of things.
 
  However, nothing saves !!!?

 I'm not qualified to answer this question because I've never used
 Ubuntu; I've never booted from a usb key; and I'm on the gentoo-user
 ml ;) buuut maybe the usb key boot idea works like a live-cd and loads
 your filesystem into a RAM disk?  In which case, changed you made
 wouldn't actually be saved...  you could add another partition to the
 key for persistent storage perhaps?

Most of Iain's caveats apply here too, but judging from Knoppix you need to 
pass some boot options to the kernel to let it know where your config files 
are saved . . . assuming of course that Ubuntu on a LiveCD/USB has this level 
of sophistication.

Hope this helps.
-- 
Regards,
Mick


pgp8UkwGcmJZ4.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Howto Read the Fine Manual

2007-05-22 Thread Florian Philipp
Hi!

This question is so basic it's nearly embarrassing to ask...

Why doesn't apropos or man -k find anything? 

For example:
# man -k man
man: nothing appropriate

Thanks in advance

Florian Philipp


pgpqzhnBchGEd.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Howto Read the Fine Manual

2007-05-22 Thread Dan Farrell
On Tue, 22 May 2007 22:09:33 +0200
Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi!
 
 This question is so basic it's nearly embarrassing to ask...
 
 Why doesn't apropos or man -k find anything? 
 
 For example:
 # man -k man
 man: nothing appropriate
 
 Thanks in advance
 
 Florian Philipp

you need to build the database first.  try 'makewhatis' as root
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Touchscreens under linux

2007-05-22 Thread Timo Boettcher
Hi!

 For my Musicbox[1] project, I am looking for a way to control a mpd[2]
 with a touchscreen. The device I have in mind is a 10,2 VGA / USB
 touchscreen. I assume it is supported by linux.

 If I understand correctly, the touchscreen is (if used correctly) just
 another way to control the mouse pointer. Is that right?

 Do I have to use X to use the touchscreen, or can I use it with gpm or
 SDL?

 Does anybody know a client for mpd ([2]) that works without X an can be
 controlled with a touchscreen? Maybe using SDL?

 If there is no client that works without X, does anybody know something
 that will work as an onscreen-keyboard?

 Timo
 
PS: yes, I have read the howto[3]

[1] http://blog.spida.net/index.php?/archives/9-Powerusage-II-Musicbox.html
[2] http://www.musicpd.org/
[3] http://tldp.org/HOWTO/XFree86-Touch-Screen-HOWTO.html
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ssh Failed to add the host to the list of known hosts

2007-05-22 Thread Denis

You probably moved your home directory using root, or something like that.


I don't remember doing that, but maybe I missed something during an
install, who knows...


chown username: /home/username/.ssh
chown username: /home/username/.ssh/*
chmod 700 /home/username/.ssh
chmod 600 /home/username.ssh/*


Yep, this solved it.  I just wasn't sure if the user was supposed to
belong to some group for this to work automatically, but I guess
not...

Thanks!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Howto Read the Fine Manual

2007-05-22 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 22:09:33 Florian Philipp wrote:
 Why doesn't apropos or man -k find anything?

 For example:
 # man -k man
 man: nothing appropriate

sys-apps/man installs a cron job in /etc/cron.daily/makewhatis. Did you 
install a cron daemon? Is it configured to run cron jobs in /etc/cron.*/ ? 
(vixie-cron defaults to that).

http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=9#doc_chap2

-- 
Bo Andresen


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[gentoo-user] Re: Touchscreens under linux

2007-05-22 Thread James
Timo Boettcher spida at spida.net writes:


  For my Musicbox[1] project, I am looking for a way to control a mpd[2]
  with a touchscreen. The device I have in mind is a 10,2 VGA / USB
  touchscreen. I assume it is supported by linux.

Hello Timo,

I have not set one up, but, if my memory is correct, there is a driver
to enable for a few specific brands, in the kernel sources. Poke around
in the kernel sources and look for info...


hth,

James

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk
  
  That won't work, portage will complain that there is a problem with 
  our world file and bail out.
 
 Ah, thanks.  I didn't realize emerge was unhappy with 
 packages in world which are not already installed.
 
  Put the packages you want in a file like world then do
  emerge -ef $(cat myworld).
 
 -- 
 Q

Another option might be to just go ahead and buckle down and 
'emerge -au world', then start the process.

^^

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 23 May 2007 08:09:04 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Put the packages you want in a file like world then do
   emerge -ef $(cat myworld).  

 Another option might be to just go ahead and buckle down and 
 'emerge -au world', then start the process.

Which won't do much if your world file is more or less empty.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Bother, said Pooh, as the media exposed his sexual depravity.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk


 -Original Message-
 From: Dan Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:27 AM
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question
 
 
 Not to mention you will spend much longer waiting for 
 everything to download then you'd have to wait for everything 
 do download on demand. It would probably be more desirable 
 for you to keep a network-shared distfiles than mirror the 
 servers.  Then there's the age-old 'static hosts file' 
 problem - just like the giant host file describing everyone 
 took longer to transfer than to become outdated back in the 
 glorious days of UNIX, it will also probably take longer to 
 dowload all distfiles ever than it will for those distfiles 
 to become outdated.  In conclusion, I think this is a rather 
 silly idea. 
 -- 

You are right I think.
If nothing else the handbook says that Gentoo etiquite says not
to rsync your portage tree more than once a day.  For the average
distro, once a week or even once a month is more than sufficient
to keep up with the packages in the main branch.

I think that I will probably be better off doing a stage three
install, then doing an 'emerge -euD world' or similar before
moving on from there.  After that, I can just make sure to watch
the FAQ's and walkthroughs when I install Xorg to make sure that
I do it right.  ^_^

Hopefully by the time I build the machine, either A) I can get
a decent nVidia card, or B) the ATI drivers will be released. ^_^

I preffer nVidia, but if the ATI drivers go open source (crossing
my fingers but not holding my breath), then that will be a good
option as well.

^_^

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 02:13:18 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If nothing else the handbook says that Gentoo etiquite says not
 to rsync your portage tree more than once a day.  For the average
 distro, once a week or even once a month is more than sufficient
 to keep up with the packages in the main branch.

If you wait more than 30 days between syncs you risk missing messages in 
package.mask. Packages must be in package.mask for 30 days before being 
removed from the tree...

 I think that I will probably be better off doing a stage three
 install, then doing an 'emerge -euD world' or similar before
 moving on from there.

Err.. what was the purpose of that `emerge -e world` ? (-u and -D does 
absolutely nothing when used with -e).

-- 
Bo Andresen


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I think that I will probably be better off doing a stage three
 install, then doing an 'emerge -euD world' or similar before
 moving on from there.  After that, I can just make sure to watch
 the FAQ's and walkthroughs when I install Xorg to make sure that
 I do it right.  ^_^

why?  there is no need to do that. emerge -u --newuse world would be much 
more 'interessting'. Btw, an deep world update ruined most of my weekend... 
don't do --deep if you don't have to.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Dale
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
 On Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
 I think that I will probably be better off doing a stage three
 install, then doing an 'emerge -euD world' or similar before
 moving on from there.  After that, I can just make sure to watch
 the FAQ's and walkthroughs when I install Xorg to make sure that
 I do it right.  ^_^
 

 why?  there is no need to do that. emerge -u --newuse world would be much 
 more 'interessting'. Btw, an deep world update ruined most of my weekend... 
 don't do --deep if you don't have to.

   

Funny, I sync every few days or so and always do a emerge -uvD world.  I
have less problems with that than just doing a -u world.

Maybe it is when you do things consistantly that keeps things going
well.  ;-)

Dale

:-)  :-)  :-)  :-)

-- 
www.myspace.com/-remove-me-dalek1967

Copy n paste then remove the -remove-me- part.



Re: [gentoo-user] Touchscreens under linux

2007-05-22 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 22:29 +0200, Timo Boettcher wrote:

  If I understand correctly, the touchscreen is (if used correctly) just
  another way to control the mouse pointer. Is that right?

yes.  when you touch, the mouse moves to, and clicks at that location.
You usually have an option to use right clicks.  Depending on the
driver, dragging and other more complicated mouse features may be a bit
more tricky.  Similar to using a touchpad.

Some newer tablet PC's (ie. Toshiba, not sure about others) actually
have a special pen which moves the mouse without touching the screen -
you just hover over the screen and the mouse moves, then touch to get a
click.

  Do I have to use X to use the touchscreen, or can I use it with gpm or
  SDL?

nope, AFAIR it will work like any mouse.  There's not much you can do
without X though is there?  Unless you have a keyboard, and then why not
have a mouse as well?

HTH,
-- 
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au

People that can't find something to live for always seem to find something to
die for.  The problem is, they usually want the rest of us to die for it too.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007, Dale wrote:
 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
  On Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I think that I will probably be better off doing a stage three
  install, then doing an 'emerge -euD world' or similar before
  moving on from there.  After that, I can just make sure to watch
  the FAQ's and walkthroughs when I install Xorg to make sure that
  I do it right.  ^_^
 
  why?  there is no need to do that. emerge -u --newuse world would be much
  more 'interessting'. Btw, an deep world update ruined most of my
  weekend... don't do --deep if you don't have to.

 Funny, I sync every few days or so and always do a emerge -uvD world.  I
 have less problems with that than just doing a -u world.

 Maybe it is when you do things consistantly that keeps things going
well

and are you doing revdep-rebuilt afterwards?

Last time gwenviev and kipi stuff broke, krita broke and some other stuff. 
Krita did not emerge because of some changed symbols, so I had to reemerge 
koffice-libs - something revdep-rebuild did not catch. It catches changed 
versions, but if a lib is recompiled because of an -r update and there are 
symbol problems, revdep will not see them... 
I had to rebuild kdepim and a lot of other stuff, just because of that -D 
update. It sucks to have to revdep-rebuild a douzend packages. It suckes even 
more when half of them fail because of some symbols and you have to reemerge 
three or four additional libs, so you can't just let it run unattended...

In my years of gentoo, -D always caused problems and was almost never worth 
the trouble.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Can't start X after a few months of updates

2007-05-22 Thread John J. Foster
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:03:23PM -0500, deface wrote:
 http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_ATI_Drivers#Module_Requirement_Mismatch
 
 On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 22:52 -0400, John J. Foster wrote:
 
  Hi,
  
  My system had been happily chugging along with X and KDE running for a
  few months nonstop. Every Saturday I'd run an update world. But, I never
  restarted X and obviously never rebooted. Yesterday we had a 3 hour
  power outage that my UPS couldn't keep up with, and when I finally got
  power back, X won't start. I _think_ this is the relevant portion of
  /var/log/Xorg.0.log.
  
  
  (II) Module fglrx: vendor=FireGL - ATI Technologies Inc.
  compiled for 7.1.0, module version = 8.28.8
  Module class: X.Org Video Driver
  ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 1.0
  [R200Setup] X version mismatch - detected X.org 7.2.0.0, required X.org 
  7.1.0.0
  (II) UnloadModule: fglrx
  (II) Unloading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//fglrx_drv.so
  (EE) Failed to load module fglrx (module requirement mismatch, 0)
  
  
  Can anyone help me, as I have know idea what to do?
  
  Thanks,
  festus

deface - thanks, but I'd already read that section after finding it via
scroogle. That particular advice didn't work for me. However, as
long as I had that page open, I saw a bit about making the following
change in xorg.conf.

from ---
Section Device
Identifier  ATI Graphics Adapter 0
Driver  fglrx
BusID   PCI:3:0:0
EndSection

to ---
Section Device
Identifier  ATI Graphics Adapter 0
Driver  radeon
BusID   PCI:3:0:0
EndSection

...and this worked. So thanks for getting me to reread that page!!!

festus
-- 
It is not unusual for those at the wrong end of the club to have a
clearer picture of reality than those who wield it.
  Noam Chomsky


pgp58Y2qVSgs6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk


 -Original Message-
 From: Hemmann, Volker Armin 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:58 AM
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question
 
 
 On Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007, Dale wrote:
  Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
   On Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I think that I will probably be better off doing a stage three 
   install, then doing an 'emerge -euD world' or similar 
 before moving 
   on from there.  After that, I can just make sure to 
 watch the FAQ's 
   and walkthroughs when I install Xorg to make sure that I do it 
   right.  ^_^
  
   why?  there is no need to do that. emerge -u --newuse 
 world would be 
   much more 'interessting'. Btw, an deep world update 
 ruined most of 
   my weekend... don't do --deep if you don't have to.
 
  Funny, I sync every few days or so and always do a emerge 
 -uvD world.  
  I have less problems with that than just doing a -u world.
 
  Maybe it is when you do things consistantly that keeps things going 
 well
 
 and are you doing revdep-rebuilt afterwards?
 
 Last time gwenviev and kipi stuff broke, krita broke and some 
 other stuff. 
 Krita did not emerge because of some changed symbols, so I 
 had to reemerge 
 koffice-libs - something revdep-rebuild did not catch. It 
 catches changed 
 versions, but if a lib is recompiled because of an -r update 
 and there are 
 symbol problems, revdep will not see them... 
 I had to rebuild kdepim and a lot of other stuff, just 
 because of that -D 
 update. It sucks to have to revdep-rebuild a douzend 
 packages. It suckes even 
 more when half of them fail because of some symbols and you 
 have to reemerge 
 three or four additional libs, so you can't just let it run 
 unattended...
 
 In my years of gentoo, -D always caused problems and was 
 almost never worth 
 the trouble.
 -- 

I am glad I am asking questions now, and not after doing something
dumb. :P  I could SOOO mess things up on a new box. ^_^

;-)  I think the keyword of the day will be planning! ^_^
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread Dale
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
 Dale wrote:
   
 Funny, I sync every few days or so and always do a emerge -uvD world.  I
 have less problems with that than just doing a -u world.

 Maybe it is when you do things consistantly that keeps things going
 well
 

 and are you doing revdep-rebuilt afterwards?
   

I have ran it a few times but it never wants to rebuild anything but
gcc, which has been a bug for over a year I think.  I did unmask java
once and run revdep-rebuild and it wanted to rebuild OOo.  That is all I
can remember having trouble with.
 Last time gwenviev and kipi stuff broke, krita broke and some other stuff. 
 Krita did not emerge because of some changed symbols, so I had to reemerge 
 koffice-libs - something revdep-rebuild did not catch. It catches changed 
 versions, but if a lib is recompiled because of an -r update and there are 
 symbol problems, revdep will not see them... 
 I had to rebuild kdepim and a lot of other stuff, just because of that -D 
 update. It sucks to have to revdep-rebuild a douzend packages. It suckes even 
 more when half of them fail because of some symbols and you have to reemerge 
 three or four additional libs, so you can't just let it run unattended...

 In my years of gentoo, -D always caused problems and was almost never worth 
 the trouble.
   

I use KDE and have a lot of packages installed and I seem to be having
better luck myself.  I did used to just run -u world but that was when I
ran into trouble.  I guess we have something different on our system. 

Dale

:-)  :-)  :-)  :-)

-- 
www.myspace.com/-remove-me-dalek1967

Copy n paste then remove the -remove-me- part.