Re: [gentoo-user] @kde-4.2

2009-03-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 02:09:34 + (UTC), James wrote:

 'autounmask kde-4.2' did not work.

So autounmask does not understand sets. Either append the set file to
package.keywords

cat /etc/portage/sets/kde4.3 /etc/portage/package.keywords

Or make package.keywordsa directory and simply put a copy of the sets
file in there (or a symlink to the sets file). This is the more
manageable option.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Don't hate yourself in the morning, sleep until noon.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Trouble with xorg-server-1.5.2, hal and synaptics on a Samsung NC10

2009-03-09 Thread Dragos Petre
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Daniel Pielmeier 
daniel.pielme...@googlemail.com wrote:

 2009/3/6 Dragos Petre drpet...@gmail.com:
 
  Thanks, Daniel! Just tried it - commented out altogether the synaptics
  section in the 10-x11-input.fdi section but I get exactly the same
 result.
  Anybody other ideas?
 
  Best Regards,
  Dragos.
 

 Did you also try to replace it with the contents of the other file and
 how does the Xorg.0.log look now?

 --
 Regards,
 Daniel


I've also tried xorg-server-1.5.3-r2 but the problems are the same. Anybody
any other ideas?

Thanks,
Dragos.


Re: [gentoo-user] @kde-4.2

2009-03-09 Thread Robin Atwood
On Monday 09 Mar 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 02:09:34 + (UTC), James wrote:
  'autounmask kde-4.2' did not work.

 So autounmask does not understand sets. Either append the set file to
 package.keywords

 cat /etc/portage/sets/kde4.3 /etc/portage/package.keywords

 Or make package.keywordsa directory and simply put a copy of the sets
 file in there (or a symlink to the sets file). This is the more
 manageable option.

Another approach is:

ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~* emerge -pv --columns @kde-4.2 | awk '{ print $4  ~* }' 
 kde4

which worked for me. (You will have to top'n'tail the output a bit.)

HTH
-Robin
-- 
--
Robin Atwood.

Ship me somewheres east of Suez, where the best is like the worst,
 Where there ain't no Ten Commandments an' a man can raise a thirst
 from Mandalay by Rudyard Kipling
--











Re: [gentoo-user] python2.4 directory

2009-03-09 Thread Dirk Uys
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Daniel Pielmeier
daniel.pielme...@googlemail.com wrote:
 2009/3/5 Evgeniy Bushkov z...@dotcomltd.ru:

 He already told us that he unmerged python.

 If you have successfully migrated to python 2.5 you should normally be
 able to remove this directory as this are probably leftovers from the
 old install where portage can do nothing about.
 To be save, what are the contents of this directory? Just
 site-packages with byte compiled python modules?

 --
 Regards,
 Daniel

The only remaining contents was two broken symlinks in the
site-packages directory. I proceeded and manually removed the
directory. I'm not expecting any problems, was just wondering why
portage didn't remove this empty directories for me? Guess the broken
symlinks may have played a role.

Thanks for the suggestions

Regards
Dirk



Re: [gentoo-user] python2.4 directory

2009-03-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:56:22 +0200, Dirk Uys wrote:

 The only remaining contents was two broken symlinks in the
 site-packages directory. I proceeded and manually removed the
 directory. I'm not expecting any problems, was just wondering why
 portage didn't remove this empty directories for me? Guess the broken
 symlinks may have played a role.

Portage won't remove non-empty directories or files it did not create.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Accept that some days you're the pigeon, and some days you're the statue.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Re: @kde-4.2

2009-03-09 Thread James
Neil Bothwick neil at digimed.co.uk writes:



  'autounmask kde-4.2' did not work.

 So autounmask does not understand sets. Either append the set file to
 package.keywords

Ok, 
On my next 4.2.x kde install, I'll try this approach with autounmask.

 cat /etc/portage/sets/kde4.3 /etc/portage/package.keywords 
 Or make package.keywordsa directory and simply put a copy of the sets
 file in there (or a symlink to the sets file). This is the more
 manageable option.


Interesting approach. I usually like to follow the gentoo recommended
practices. I get the feeling that sets via portage 2.2 is very
much a work in progress. So which of these approaches is likely
to become the de'facto method?


Also, I omitted the ~amd64 at the end of all of those manual
entries into my package.keywords file. It work without them.
So my question is the -amd64 entry on every line of my package.keywords
deprecated now with portage 2.2?


James





[gentoo-user] Re: @kde-4.2

2009-03-09 Thread James
Robin Atwood robin.atwood at attglobal.net writes:


 Another approach is:
 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~* emerge -pv --columns @kde-4.2 | awk '{ print $4  ~* }' 
  kde4

 which worked for me. (You will have to top'n'tail the output a bit.)

OK,

This is an interesting approach.
So if I use a very restricted subset of kde-4.2 and call it @james-kde-4.2
and filter on that, it should work.



Thanks for the suggestion. I get the feeling we're all hacking our own
install semantics here for kde-4.2. With dozens of workstations to eventually
support, I'm looking for something (error free) in my systematic approach.

Winging it a little bit different each time brings about risk and 
inhibits my conservative nature, when doing admin work. It just seems like
every thing I read, there are different wrinkles to the various approaches.

So we now have evdev (xorg.conf going on a diet),
kde-4.x gymnastics
and no installation media for '09.
Very smart folks have recommended using different media 
to install (most of which have worked for me) and
things like the kernel/distro function for drivers keeps changing.


Ya just gotta love Gentoo. Just when I was ready to completely
script up my job, I have to relearn how to install and
maintain systems all over again. It's going to be real interesting
to see how the official gentoo docs end up.

So. We have lots of work to do on the handbooks just for the autobuilds.
Should we have a new directory layout as well?


I'll keep all of this in mind.

thx,
James






Re: [gentoo-user] Wireless broadband modems - Working?

2009-03-09 Thread Grant
 Thanks Neil, I'd like to get as close as possible to being ready to
 plug-and-play with one of those modems.  Do you remember the names of
 the kernel modules?  I've never used PPP software before.  Can you
 recommend a package?

 You need usbserial and the Novatel modems use the option module. I use
 wvdial with this config, which worked with T-Mobile, Vodafone and O2.

 [Dialer tmob]
 Modem = /dev/ttyUSB0
 Baud = 460800
 Init2 =AT
 Init3 = ATFE0V1X1D2C1S0=0
 ISDN = 0
 Modem Type = Analog Modem
 Phone = *99***1#
 Username = username
 Password = password

Thanks Neil.  Weird that wvdial is in /usr/portage but doesn't come up
at gentoo-portage.com.

- Grant



Re: [gentoo-user] ppp connection problem

2009-03-09 Thread Daniel da Veiga
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 17:20, Moshe Kamensky
moshe.kamen...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I am trying to help my father install gentoo on a new computer (I am
 across the ocean). We have a problem with the internet connection. He
 has an adsl account. He runs pppoe-start, and it says that he is
 connected. ifconfig shows that ppp0 is up, and gives an ip address.
 However, I can't ping that address (I get 100% packet loss). He also
 can't ping any address.

 We called the ISP, and from their side it seems that he is connected,
 and everything is fine. I don't know where else to look. The log
 messages showed in the beginning messages of the form

 LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests

 but they seem to no longer appear. As I said, I don't even know where to
 start looking for the problem. Any help is appreciated.


OK, this may me a little off topic. I don't even know where to start
when it comes to check your dad's connection. Being far away and not
knowing the exact messages, with no access to the machine itself, its
almost impossible to debug and resolve the problem.

My advice: get a router! Configure it for your dad's connection, the
router will assume the PPoE connection, saving you the trouble. It
also will act as a firewall and even if your dad's computer fail, any
other DHCP enabled device connected to the router will have Internet
access.

Anyway, my two cent :D

-- 
Daniel da Veiga



Re: [gentoo-user] Wireless broadband modems - Working?

2009-03-09 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks Neil, I'd like to get as close as possible to being ready to
 plug-and-play with one of those modems.  Do you remember the names of
 the kernel modules?  I've never used PPP software before.  Can you
 recommend a package?

 You need usbserial and the Novatel modems use the option module. I use
 wvdial with this config, which worked with T-Mobile, Vodafone and O2.

 [Dialer tmob]
 Modem = /dev/ttyUSB0
 Baud = 460800
 Init2 =AT
 Init3 = ATFE0V1X1D2C1S0=0
 ISDN = 0
 Modem Type = Analog Modem
 Phone = *99***1#
 Username = username
 Password = password

 Thanks Neil.  Weird that wvdial is in /usr/portage but doesn't come up
 at gentoo-portage.com.

Looking at http://gentoo-portage.com/Browse it seems the entire
net-dialup category (and several others) are absent from that site.
Maybe he didn't get it all set up properly after the servers were
lost.



Re: [gentoo-user] rsync + tar + bz2 ?

2009-03-09 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Samstag, 7. März 2009 17:04:17 schrieb Grant:
 I'm backing up numerous large files on another machine on my local
 network.  I've only been using rsync, but it occured to me that I
 might be able to save some time and space if I incorporate tar and
 bzip2.  How will rsync interact with those?  If I turn the whole
 backup into a big tar.bz2, would rsync need to redownload the whole
 thing if I change one file?  If so, maybe I should turn different
 groups of files into tar.bz2 archives so rsync only needs to
 redownload an archive if one of its files has changed?

Another way, although a bit more work to setup, whould be to use a Network 
block device. Unlike NFS, the server just exports the block device, 
everything else (mkfs, encryption) can be done on the client.

Bye...

Dirk


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[gentoo-user] Re: @kde-4.2

2009-03-09 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

James wrote:

Thanks for the suggestion. I get the feeling we're all hacking our own
install semantics here for kde-4.2.


I find the -meta packages very helpful.  Instead of pulling in all of 
KDE (with tons of stuff I don't need), I simply emerged those:


  kde-base/ark
  kde-base/kate
  kde-base/kcalc
  kde-base/kdeartwork-meta
  kde-base/kdebase-meta
  kde-base/kdegraphics-meta
  kde-base/kdeplasma-addons
  kde-base/kget

Emerging the *whole* of KDE is, I think, something no one needs :P  Just 
go with the basic stuff, and then emerge additional applications later. 
  You don't even need to make up your own sets or -metas.  Your 
patience will thank you later when the need arises to rebuild everything 
(when KDE 4.2.2 arrives, for example).





[gentoo-user] openvz-sources Athlon64/X2 - kernel panic !

2009-03-09 Thread Jarry

Hi,

does anyone have openvz-sources kernel working with athlon64/x2 ?
I downloaded last stable sources, configured (I did not change
a lot from default config), compiled, installed. But whenever
I boot, I get kernel panic. Messages are scrolled up very fast,
but I captured something with my video-camera:


_ *** something not important was before *** 
CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64k (64 bytes/line)
CPU: L2 Cache: 1024K (64 bytes/line)
CPU 0/0 - Node 0
CPU: Physical Procesor ID: 0
CPU: Procesor Core ID: 0
Freeing SMP alternatives: 44k freed
ACPI: Core revision 20060707
Page beancounter hash is 524288 entries.
..MP-BIOS but: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
Using local APIC timer interrupts.
result 12564475
Detected 12.564 MHz APIC timer.
Booting procesor 1/2 APIC 0x1
something scrolled very fast, my camera did not capture it
R0P: 000ffede8d R08:... R09...
R10, R11, R12 similar numbers, I guess registry values
R13, R14, R15
...
Call Trace:
[80207819] calibrate_delay+0xb1/0x388
[80856f2d] smp_callin+0x95/0xdc
[80857a35] start_secondary+0x18/0x453

Code: 89 c0 48 09 d0 48 89 07 31 c0 c3 0f 31 89 c1 f3 90 0f 31 29
console shuts up ...
Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
Stuck ??
Inqiuring remote APIC #1...
... APIC #1 ID: 0100
... APIC #1 VERSION: 00040010
... APIC #1 SPIV: 00ff
__ *** end, stuck here *** ___


I tried to change a few settings in kernel config and recompile
again, but no difference. What could be the reason for this?
Anybody has idea?

btw, I was affraid of hardware problem, but I tried to install
WindowsXP and it works like a charm...

Jarry



Re: [gentoo-user] rsync + tar + bz2 ?

2009-03-09 Thread Hung Dang

Dirk Heinrichs wrote:

Am Samstag, 7. März 2009 17:04:17 schrieb Grant:
  

I'm backing up numerous large files on another machine on my local
network.  I've only been using rsync, but it occured to me that I
might be able to save some time and space if I incorporate tar and
bzip2.  How will rsync interact with those?  If I turn the whole
backup into a big tar.bz2, would rsync need to redownload the whole
thing if I change one file?  If so, maybe I should turn different
groups of files into tar.bz2 archives so rsync only needs to
redownload an archive if one of its files has changed?



Another way, although a bit more work to setup, whould be to use a Network 
block device. Unlike NFS, the server just exports the block device, 
everything else (mkfs, encryption) can be done on the client.


Bye...

Dirk
  

rsync will download only if source and destination files are different.
From my experiences using rar is faster and save more space  than bz2.

Hung



[gentoo-user] Re: @kde-4.2

2009-03-09 Thread ABCD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

James wrote:
 Neil Bothwick writes:
 cat /etc/portage/sets/kde4.3 /etc/portage/package.keywords 
 Or make package.keywordsa directory and simply put a copy of the sets
 file in there (or a symlink to the sets file). This is the more
 manageable option.
 
 Interesting approach. I usually like to follow the gentoo recommended
 practices. I get the feeling that sets via portage 2.2 is very
 much a work in progress. So which of these approaches is likely
 to become the de'facto method?
 
 Also, I omitted the ~amd64 at the end of all of those manual
 entries into my package.keywords file. It work without them.
 So my question is the -amd64 entry on every line of my package.keywords
 deprecated now with portage 2.2?
 
 
 James
 

If you are using the kde-testing overlay, there are files that you can
symlink under /etc/portage/package.{keywords,unmask}/ to unmask/keyword
particular versions of KDE. Note also that any file in [/etc/portage]
that begins with 'package.' can be more than just a flat file. If it is
a directory, then all the files in that directory will be sorted in
ascending alphabetical order by file name and summed together as if it
were a single file (from portage(5)). To be precise, it can be an
entire directory tree, and still work the same way.

A line in package.keywords without any KEYWORDS implies ~${ARCH}
(again, see portage(5)).

With the exception of sets and FEATURES=preserved-libs, everything in
portage-2.2 is in portage-2.1.6.*, which is now stable just about
everywhere, so this behavior is at least that old (although I believe it
has been around longer).

- --
ABCD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkm1awcACgkQOypDUo0oQOpvhgCdEAKRJp1kSFoff++jTn+JQYvp
VZ8An0/7OMDSrfddocWGkJFiArV4D8tZ
=gruJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




[gentoo-user] Broken binary and revdep-rebuild doesn't find it.

2009-03-09 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

rea...@gentoo ~ $ ldd /usr/lib64/NX/bin/* | grep not found
libXcomp.so.3 = not found
libXcompext.so.3 = not found
libXcompshad.so.3 = not found
libXcomp.so.3 = not found

So today's update of glibc seems to have broken those binaries. 
However, running revdep-rebuilt doesn't find the breakage:


* Dynamic linking on your system is consistent... All done.




Re: [gentoo-user] rsync + tar + bz2 ?

2009-03-09 Thread Saphirus Sage
Hung Dang wrote:
 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
 Am Samstag, 7. März 2009 17:04:17 schrieb Grant:
  
 I'm backing up numerous large files on another machine on my local
 network.  I've only been using rsync, but it occured to me that I
 might be able to save some time and space if I incorporate tar and
 bzip2.  How will rsync interact with those?  If I turn the whole
 backup into a big tar.bz2, would rsync need to redownload the whole
 thing if I change one file?  If so, maybe I should turn different
 groups of files into tar.bz2 archives so rsync only needs to
 redownload an archive if one of its files has changed?
 

 Another way, although a bit more work to setup, whould be to use a
 Network block device. Unlike NFS, the server just exports the block
 device, everything else (mkfs, encryption) can be done on the client.

 Bye...

 Dirk
   
 rsync will download only if source and destination files are different.
 From my experiences using rar is faster and save more space  than bz2.

 Hung

But rar is a proprietary archival format, I'd much sooner go with a tar,
compressed with bzip2 or lzma. If the biggest concern is just getting it
done quickly, gzip it, but for the love of all things free, not rar, I say!



[gentoo-user] Re: ppp connection problem

2009-03-09 Thread Moshe Kamensky
* Daniel da Veiga danieldave...@gmail.com [09/03/09 12:33]:
 On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 17:20, Moshe Kamensky
 moshe.kamen...@googlemail.com wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I am trying to help my father install gentoo on a new computer (I am
  across the ocean). We have a problem with the internet connection. He
  has an adsl account. He runs pppoe-start, and it says that he is
  connected. ifconfig shows that ppp0 is up, and gives an ip address.
  However, I can't ping that address (I get 100% packet loss). He also
  can't ping any address.
 
  We called the ISP, and from their side it seems that he is connected,
  and everything is fine. I don't know where else to look. The log
  messages showed in the beginning messages of the form
 
  LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
 
  but they seem to no longer appear. As I said, I don't even know where to
  start looking for the problem. Any help is appreciated.
 
 
 OK, this may me a little off topic. I don't even know where to start
 when it comes to check your dad's connection. Being far away and not
 knowing the exact messages, with no access to the machine itself, its
 almost impossible to debug and resolve the problem.
 
 My advice: get a router! Configure it for your dad's connection, the
 router will assume the PPoE connection, saving you the trouble. It
 also will act as a firewall and even if your dad's computer fail, any
 other DHCP enabled device connected to the router will have Internet
 access.
 
 Anyway, my two cent :D
 

Thanks for the advice. I was told that it is possible to configure the 
current modem as a router, and that's what I will try next. Generally 
speaking, I don't understand what is the advantage: the router also 
needs to be configured, and can also fail?

Thanks,
Moshe



pgpfrt6C98bi6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Re: ppp connection problem

2009-03-09 Thread Moshe Kamensky

* Mike Kazantsev mike_kazant...@fraggod.net [09/03/09 06:15]:
 On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:20:32 -0400
 Moshe Kamensky moshe.kamen...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
  We called the ISP, and from their side it seems that he is connected, 
  and everything is fine. I don't know where else to look. The log 
  messages showed in the beginning messages of the form
  
  LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
  
  but they seem to no longer appear. As I said, I don't even know where to 
  start looking for the problem. Any help is appreciated.
 
 I can suggest trying at least two things:
 
 1. pon connection name debug nodetach
   You'll see a lot of messages, and, probably, some errors. Most of
   them are probably non-fatal, but try eliminating all of them by
   setting right asyncmap, compression, authentication etc
   In the end you should get IP and connection shouldn't break after a
   minute or so, which is often because of 2.

Thanks. As far as I understand, the connection name should be the name 
of a file in /etc/ppp/peers? If so, this is probably something he should 
create.

 
 2. ip route
   Check that there's only one default route, that there's a route to IP
   you're connecing with, aside from default one through it, and that
   it's metric is lower than the default one. Check that you can still
   ping that IP.

I checked that already, that seems fine.

Thank you,
Moshe

 
 -- 
 Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net




pgpCBfDj5QAkJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ppp connection problem

2009-03-09 Thread Dale
Moshe Kamensky wrote:


 Thanks. As far as I understand, the connection name should be the name 
 of a file in /etc/ppp/peers? If so, this is probably something he should 
 create.

   

That can be created using pppconfig if I recall correctly.  I also
noticed pppoe-setup in case that may be of interest. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: @kde-4.2

2009-03-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:00:33 + (UTC), James wrote:

  cat /etc/portage/sets/kde4.3 /etc/portage/package.keywords 
  Or make package.keywordsa directory and simply put a copy of the sets
  file in there (or a symlink to the sets file). This is the more
  manageable option.  
 
 Interesting approach. I usually like to follow the gentoo recommended
 practices. I get the feeling that sets via portage 2.2 is very
 much a work in progress. So which of these approaches is likely
 to become the de'facto method?

The Gentoo approach has always been to handle package.keywords yourself,
autounmask is an unofficial utility. I hope there will be the facility to
add a set to the file in future.

 Also, I omitted the ~amd64 at the end of all of those manual
 entries into my package.keywords file. It work without them.
 So my question is the -amd64 entry on every line of my
 package.keywords deprecated now with portage 2.2?

It's always been like that (well, for a very long time, at least). If
you don't specify an arch in the file, it uses the testing variant of
whatever you have in make.conf. 


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Do you steal taglines too?


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ppp connection problem

2009-03-09 Thread Daniel da Veiga
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 19:06, Moshe Kamensky
moshe.kamen...@googlemail.com wrote:
 * Daniel da Veiga danieldave...@gmail.com [09/03/09 12:33]:
 On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 17:20, Moshe Kamensky
 moshe.kamen...@googlemail.com wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I am trying to help my father install gentoo on a new computer (I am
  across the ocean). We have a problem with the internet connection. He
  has an adsl account. He runs pppoe-start, and it says that he is
  connected. ifconfig shows that ppp0 is up, and gives an ip address.
  However, I can't ping that address (I get 100% packet loss). He also
  can't ping any address.
 
  We called the ISP, and from their side it seems that he is connected,
  and everything is fine. I don't know where else to look. The log
  messages showed in the beginning messages of the form
 
  LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
 
  but they seem to no longer appear. As I said, I don't even know where to
  start looking for the problem. Any help is appreciated.
 

 OK, this may me a little off topic. I don't even know where to start
 when it comes to check your dad's connection. Being far away and not
 knowing the exact messages, with no access to the machine itself, its
 almost impossible to debug and resolve the problem.

 My advice: get a router! Configure it for your dad's connection, the
 router will assume the PPoE connection, saving you the trouble. It
 also will act as a firewall and even if your dad's computer fail, any
 other DHCP enabled device connected to the router will have Internet
 access.

 Anyway, my two cent :D


 Thanks for the advice. I was told that it is possible to configure the
 current modem as a router, and that's what I will try next. Generally
 speaking, I don't understand what is the advantage: the router also
 needs to be configured, and can also fail?


There are some advantages. The router (or modem in router mode) is
already configured, you usually just have to set the right auth method
(PPPoE) and provide a valid user/pass, and that's about it. It will
only authenticate when the connection is ready or keep trying till it
suceeds. You don't need to start the connection ever, you'll get a
firewall and DHCP server, and the configuration (usually a web
interface) is easy (at least easier than a ppp connection). Most
routers get all information and relay it (DNS, gateway) to their
address, or provide this info in DHCP, so there's no configuration to
do at your computer, as an eth0 not configured is assumed DHCP. Also
you can get rid of all ppp related stuff from the computer.

I only say that cause my dad's home connection was setup that way so I
would never have to spend a whole weekend afternoon teaching him
again, he turns the computer on and its already online.

-- 
Daniel da Veiga



[gentoo-user] Re: @kde-4.2

2009-03-09 Thread James
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at arcor.de writes:

 
 James wrote:
  Thanks for the suggestion. I get the feeling we're all hacking our own
  install semantics here for kde-4.2.
 
 I find the -meta packages very helpful.  Instead of pulling in all of 
 KDE (with tons of stuff I don't need), I simply emerged those:

My understanding is that all the meta packaging is going away 
sooner than later. So either gentoo defined sets or James defined
sets are the only option, for the future

At least that's what others have indicated...


james




[gentoo-user] Re: @kde-4.2

2009-03-09 Thread James
Neil Bothwick neil at digimed.co.uk writes:


 The Gentoo approach has always been to handle package.keywords yourself,
 autounmask is an unofficial utility. I hope there will be the facility to
 add a set to the file in future.

good to know.


 It's always been like that (well, for a very long time, at least). If
 you don't specify an arch in the file, it uses the testing variant of
 whatever you have in make.conf. 


I guess being 'late' to the party, is better than missing the whole
event..


thx,

James






[gentoo-user] Nokia/TrollTech's Qt Eclipse Plug-in

2009-03-09 Thread BRM

Does anyone have an e-build for the Nokia/TrollTech Qt Eclipse Plug-in?

http://www.qtsoftware.com/developer/eclipse-integration

TIA,

Ben




[gentoo-user] LTSP 5 on Gentoo

2009-03-09 Thread Joseph

Is anybody running LTSP 5 on Gentoo?
I know it is possible to install it but not without a pain :-/
I was able to find this documentation but I think it is out of date:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/LTSP

--
#Joseph
GPG KeyID: ED0E1FB7



Re: [gentoo-user] netcard interface with alias

2009-03-09 Thread Joshua Schmidlkofer

On 3/2/09 4:10 AM, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I have 7 networks behind a machine with 5 network's device. Now, this
machine running debian, but i'll upgrade too gentoo. How i can create
a eth0:1, for example, using /etc/conf.d/net?

Thanks

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmrzNAACgkQ35zeJy7JhCijFwCfaIgUYnNX3og3zQ/RMRyEb8vY
SmoAmgPshApqi3hLGxbuz/mXhOc6GVgK
=J1Fx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



   
Is there are reason you haven't considered something like pfSense for 
this machine?


Sincerely,
  Joshua