Re: [gentoo-user] Re: (II) NV(0): Setting screen physical size to 508 x 317
2010-07-16 01:51, walt skrev: On 07/15/2010 02:15 AM, Erik wrote: ...This is the new Dell vostro|1720 from November, that replaced the old INSPIRON|8600 aquired 5 years earlier... I feel as if I'm reading a post that I selected at random from the middle of a long thread with lots of previous questions and answers that I can't see. I've never heard of either of those products. Maybe someone else knows what they are? Do not worry about not knowing about the products that I mentioned in the parenthesis in the last paragraph (they are just some laptops with differend graphic cards built in). You may know enough to help if you are familiar with Xorg, in particular the driver called NV (as the first 2 lines of my post shows). Do you for example know from where the driver gets the bogus physical display size 508 x 317 from, and why it insists on using it instead of the configured size?
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: (II) NV(0): Setting screen physical size to 508 x 317
Erik wrote: 2010-07-16 01:51, walt skrev: On 07/15/2010 02:15 AM, Erik wrote: ...This is the new Dell vostro|1720 from November, that replaced the old INSPIRON|8600 aquired 5 years earlier... I feel as if I'm reading a post that I selected at random from the middle of a long thread with lots of previous questions and answers that I can't see. I've never heard of either of those products. Maybe someone else knows what they are? Do not worry about not knowing about the products that I mentioned in the parenthesis in the last paragraph (they are just some laptops with differend graphic cards built in). You may know enough to help if you are familiar with Xorg, in particular the driver called NV (as the first 2 lines of my post shows). Do you for example know from where the driver gets the bogus physical display size 508 x 317 from, and why it insists on using it instead of the configured size? Are you using hal? If so, you may need to get or change the config files so that it will run at the settings you want instead of what it detects. By the way, I have no idea how to edit them. It's in xml. You may can google and borrow their config file tho. If you are not using hal, it should be set in xorg.conf. I don't use hal and that is where mine is set. Hope that gives you a couple ideas. Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: (II) NV(0): Setting screen physical size to 508 x 317
2010-07-16 08:13, Dale skrev: Erik wrote: 2010-07-16 01:51, walt skrev: On 07/15/2010 02:15 AM, Erik wrote: ...This is the new Dell vostro|1720 from November, that replaced the old INSPIRON|8600 aquired 5 years earlier... I feel as if I'm reading a post that I selected at random from the middle of a long thread with lots of previous questions and answers that I can't see. I've never heard of either of those products. Maybe someone else knows what they are? Do not worry about not knowing about the products that I mentioned in the parenthesis in the last paragraph (they are just some laptops with differend graphic cards built in). You may know enough to help if you are familiar with Xorg, in particular the driver called NV (as the first 2 lines of my post shows). Do you for example know from where the driver gets the bogus physical display size 508 x 317 from, and why it insists on using it instead of the configured size? Are you using hal? If so, you may need to get or change the config files so that it will run at the settings you want instead of what it detects. By the way, I have no idea how to edit them. It's in xml. You may can google and borrow their config file tho. If you are not using hal, it should be set in xorg.conf. I don't use hal and that is where mine is set. Yes I am using hal. Maybe that is the problem. But it is clear from the log file that xorg.conf is read anyway.
[gentoo-user] get-edid?
I installed app-misc/read-edid-1.4.2. It is supposed to install 2 tools; get-edid and parse-edid. But I only got parse-edid. So I can not use it. Any help?
Re: [gentoo-user] get-edid?
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:59:52 +0200, Erik wrote: I installed app-misc/read-edid-1.4.2. It is supposed to install 2 tools; get-edid and parse-edid. But I only got parse-edid. So I can not use it. % qlist read-edid /usr/sbin/get-edid /usr/share/man/man1/get-edid.1.bz2 /usr/share/man/man1/parse-edid.1.bz2 /usr/share/doc/read-edid-2.0.0-r1/NEWS.bz2 /usr/share/doc/read-edid-2.0.0-r1/README.bz2 /usr/share/doc/read-edid-2.0.0-r1/AUTHORS.bz2 /usr/share/doc/read-edid-2.0.0-r1/ChangeLog.bz2 /usr/bin/parse-edid Both are there but note that get-edid is in /usr/sbin so only in root's path. -- Neil Bothwick Ask a silly person, get a silly answer signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] get-edid?
2010-07-16 09:22, Neil Bothwick skrev: On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:59:52 +0200, Erik wrote: I installed app-misc/read-edid-1.4.2. It is supposed to install 2 tools; get-edid and parse-edid. But I only got parse-edid. So I can not use it. % qlist read-edid /usr/sbin/get-edid /usr/share/man/man1/get-edid.1.bz2 /usr/share/man/man1/parse-edid.1.bz2 /usr/share/doc/read-edid-2.0.0-r1/NEWS.bz2 /usr/share/doc/read-edid-2.0.0-r1/README.bz2 /usr/share/doc/read-edid-2.0.0-r1/AUTHORS.bz2 /usr/share/doc/read-edid-2.0.0-r1/ChangeLog.bz2 /usr/bin/parse-edid Both are there but note that get-edid is in /usr/sbin so only in root's path. Thanks for the help. So version 2.0 has both binaries, but in different places. This is what it looks like for the stable version (1.4.2): % qlist read-edid /usr/share/man/man1/get-edid.1.lzma /usr/share/man/man1/parse-edid.1.lzma /usr/share/doc/read-edid-1.4.2/AUTHORS.lzma /usr/share/doc/read-edid-1.4.2/README.lzma /usr/share/doc/read-edid-1.4.2/ChangeLog.lzma /usr/share/doc/read-edid-1.4.2/NEWS.lzma /usr/sbin/parse-edid /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/parse-edid.debug So actually the stable version fails to install get-edid. (I also had a problem with bash not finding the parse-edid binary after upgrading to 2.0, since then /usr/sbin/parse-edid was removed and /usr/bin/parse-edid was added without bash knowing about it. Ctrl+D and starting the shell again fixed it though.) Now to the actual result: /usr/sbin/get-edid: get-edid version 2.0.0 Performing real mode VBE call Interrupt 0x10 ax=0x4f00 bx=0x0 cx=0x0 Function supported Call successful VBE version 300 VBE string at 0x11100 NVIDIA VBE/DDC service about to be called Report DDC capabilities Performing real mode VBE call Interrupt 0x10 ax=0x4f15 bx=0x0 cx=0x0 Function supported Call successful Monitor and video card combination does not support DDC1 transfers Monitor and video card combination does not support DDC2 transfers 0 seconds per 128 byte EDID block transfer Screen is not blanked during DDC transfer Reading next EDID block VBE/DDC service about to be called Read EDID Performing real mode VBE call Interrupt 0x10 ax=0x4f15 bx=0x1 cx=0x0 Function supported Call failed The EDID data should not be trusted as the VBE call failed Error: output block unchanged Any idea why it fails? Is that why xorg can not read the display size either? If so, why does it just pick a random display size without reporting the error?
Re: [gentoo-user] (II) NV(0): Setting screen physical size to 508 x 317
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Erik esi...@gmail.com wrote: (There are other issues with this video device; it shows only 25 × 80 characters in the virtual terminals (should be 75 × 240). This is the new Dell vostro|1720 from November, that replaced the old INSPIRON|8600 aquired 5 years earlier, with radeon driver. That old device worked fine without any configuration files. The physical screen size was detected and the virtual kernel output switched to 75 × 240 characters as soon as the device was detected.) Hi Erik, It would help if you actually told us which driver you are using, and what the actual hardware is. I'm guessing it's an nVidia card in the new laptop, and some form of ATI card in the old one. It sounds like the driver is over-riding the xorg.conf with (incorrect) readings it's getting from the EDID for the display. Cheers, RobbieAB.
Re: [gentoo-user] (II) NV(0): Setting screen physical size to 508 x 317
2010-07-16 09:49, Robert Bridge skrev: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Erik esi...@gmail.com wrote: (There are other issues with this video device; it shows only 25 × 80 characters in the virtual terminals (should be 75 × 240). This is the new Dell vostro|1720 from November, that replaced the old INSPIRON|8600 aquired 5 years earlier, with radeon driver. That old device worked fine without any configuration files. The physical screen size was detected and the virtual kernel output switched to 75 × 240 characters as soon as the device was detected.) Hi Erik, It would help if you actually told us which driver you are using, and what the actual hardware is. I'm guessing it's an nVidia card in the new laptop, and some form of ATI card in the old one. It sounds like the driver is over-riding the xorg.conf with (incorrect) readings it's getting from the EDID for the display. My /etc/make.conf has VIDEO_CARDS=nv but I thought it was obvious from the NV in the log message. The actual hardware is reported by lspci as 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G96 [GeForce 9600M GS] (rev a1). I tried to use read-edid see what EDID shows, but the call failed (see other message). How would I know if xorg tried to read EDID and whether it worked?
Re: [gentoo-user] (II) NV(0): Setting screen physical size to 508 x 317
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:14:34 +0200, Erik wrote: My /etc/make.conf has VIDEO_CARDS=nv but I thought it was obvious from the NV in the log message. The actual hardware is reported by lspci as 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G96 [GeForce 9600M GS] (rev a1). I tried to use read-edid see what EDID shows, but the call failed (see other message). How would I know if xorg tried to read EDID and whether it worked? It should appear in the log file. The nvidia driver has UseEdid and UseEdidDpi options that you could set to False to have it ignore the EDID information, I don't know if nv has equivalent options. -- Neil Bothwick I get enough exercise just pushing my luck. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Hello All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all small testing mail Greeting's alex -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMQGJHAAoJEB8n+SuWCkjv96IIALzEF5v5CP5lUpY+i8XugXcN OcchK0DZYSA6o8v9/RFAZq5K1RJHWWeE5WFFfCIC1OqCgP2UgnCrmGTopINoXtDO hieos+pI/x1wN6HDBmkoY5ZULomNUbqiHv0Ypo50cJyseWRCjXI+HgTnRNOoxsRc IwRqJCQbH0iABsdB8ptkk1xRP7QUXT77lNBEr70zRDxkKLq37Ki8QY9cz6AzY6SP 2rVdt6OnYqGoaJA4ja1zhD2P6a2NrR61SsGQ5fAXd1EKHR8sXH+8CxfDW22HJJhN 3GtMdn956D9TCkhpCxa5kgxGCIO4YZYkP63e4H+dZTrT8W+FAer7YZhqsmY0Pj4= =9yOQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sourcegarden GmbH HR: B-104357 Steuernummer: 37/167/21214 USt-ID: DE814784953 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Mario Scheliga, Rene Otto Bank: Deutsche Bank, BLZ: 10070024, KTO: 0810929 Schoenhauser Allee 51, 10437 Berlin
Re: [gentoo-user] Hello All
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 15:44 +0200, alex wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all small testing mail Greeting's alex -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMQGJHAAoJEB8n+SuWCkjv96IIALzEF5v5CP5lUpY+i8XugXcN OcchK0DZYSA6o8v9/RFAZq5K1RJHWWeE5WFFfCIC1OqCgP2UgnCrmGTopINoXtDO hieos+pI/x1wN6HDBmkoY5ZULomNUbqiHv0Ypo50cJyseWRCjXI+HgTnRNOoxsRc IwRqJCQbH0iABsdB8ptkk1xRP7QUXT77lNBEr70zRDxkKLq37Ki8QY9cz6AzY6SP 2rVdt6OnYqGoaJA4ja1zhD2P6a2NrR61SsGQ5fAXd1EKHR8sXH+8CxfDW22HJJhN 3GtMdn956D9TCkhpCxa5kgxGCIO4YZYkP63e4H+dZTrT8W+FAer7YZhqsmY0Pj4= =9yOQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sourcegarden GmbH HR: B-104357 Steuernummer: 37/167/21214 USt-ID: DE814784953 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Mario Scheliga, Rene Otto Bank: Deutsche Bank, BLZ: 10070024, KTO: 0810929 Schoenhauser Allee 51, 10437 Berlin Hello Welcome :D -- Keep It Simple Stupid http://www.ghosTunix.org @ghosTM55
Re: [gentoo-user] Hello All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Welcome :D Yeahr, some question. How good is Gentoo for a Samba AD environment? I want to install my Gentoo at the work, and for my Data i have to connect to AD. How good will work this with a Gentoo : ? Greetings Alex -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMQGfEAAoJEB8n+SuWCkjv6IgIANElZrsyFuvZYJDMfLT/XMKe reG82pNNj3SIS65NMpd+SuOFH1S9THyiux5kWVTyOUoVEZSswCu19e9ReocJqSBH ch3T5OwsCi+BHxXx/QXUvEcAtxfIanG+K1e5/xaR5iQCljEFrblvZC0LNjiWjrhz GyQ+ZLaMN1H70pcyw/aCux8sP6IbU90c/xLZx91RmFjFDRE0bY8SgyUcNo84HqAn euchBdMMhRHlrsPDVuKMPLDPcdciZpZqh9GfR+QO7AEY2DNB/sq+NExziTBIBvE3 4lt3Awe7wJLepRbqiJxLcJ2PK/CGDGRGzNbpGd7GExlxrcz/lARq087b8Zp1vUI= =MM6p -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sourcegarden GmbH HR: B-104357 Steuernummer: 37/167/21214 USt-ID: DE814784953 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Mario Scheliga, Rene Otto Bank: Deutsche Bank, BLZ: 10070024, KTO: 0810929 Schoenhauser Allee 51, 10437 Berlin
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: viewing .m4v files with totem
walt w41...@gmail.com writes: On 07/11/2010 07:42 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: waltw41...@gmail.com writes: What does totem say when you play your m4v file? gottl...@ajglap /a/video $ totem Game_Theory_Lect_20_s.m4v bt_audio_service_open: connect() failed: Connection refused (111) Here's an interesting thread from ubuntu forums: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1490237 Interesting indeed. The problem mentioned in that article concerns mplayer, which in my case can play the .m4v. However, the comment that bluez causes problem caused me to wonder why I had it installed and then I checked my USE flags to see a large list including bluetooth. I am cleaning up other things now, but may decide to add -bluetooth to make.conf or more radically change my profile (currently ...desktop/gnome). thanks for the pointer. allan
Re: [gentoo-user] libvirt needs VirtualBox XPCOMC
You should fill a bug then, if you are sure. On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Crístian Viana cristiandei...@gmail.comwrote: Do you want to use libvirt with virtualbox? well, I wanted to make some tests with libvirt and VirtualBox, but I guess I'll leave it for some other time. I removed the virtualbox USE flag. Else try emerging virtualbox-ose or virtualbox-bin befire libvirt. nothing's changed. But this is probably a bug? I believe so. emerge should never fail, in my opinion. if the ebuild lacks a dependency, it should be pulled; if the code doesn't compile, use patches; if it has more than one conflicting USE flags, warn the user and use a default flag; anyway, it should never fail, specially like that. :-) On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:11 PM, App Deb appde...@gmail.com wrote: Do you want to use libvirt with virtualbox? If not (say you want to use it with kvm or something else) try emerging libvirt without the virtualbox flag using package.use . Else try emerging virtualbox-ose or virtualbox-bin befire libvirt. But this is probably a bug? libvirt should have virtualbox as a dependency if the use flag is enabled, I think. On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Crístian Viana cristiandei...@gmail.comwrote: hi, when I was trying to emerge the newest libvirt ebuild, the following error appeared on configure: checking for VirtualBox XPCOMC location... not found configure: error: VirtualBox XPCOMC is required for the VirtualBox driver what do I need to install to make it work? I'm emerging with the USE flags: [ebuild U ] app-emulation/libvirt-0.8.2 [0.8.1-r1] USE=libvirtd lxc network nls python qemu virtualbox -avahi -caps -iscsi -lvm -macvtap% -nfs -numa -openvz -parted -pcap% -phyp -policykit -sasl (-selinux) -udev -uml -xen
Re: [gentoo-user] Hello All
I'd start a new thread ;-) On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:08 AM, alex a...@sourcegarden.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Welcome :D Yeahr, some question. How good is Gentoo for a Samba AD environment? I want to install my Gentoo at the work, and for my Data i have to connect to AD. How good will work this with a Gentoo : ? Greetings Alex -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMQGfEAAoJEB8n+SuWCkjv6IgIANElZrsyFuvZYJDMfLT/XMKe reG82pNNj3SIS65NMpd+SuOFH1S9THyiux5kWVTyOUoVEZSswCu19e9ReocJqSBH ch3T5OwsCi+BHxXx/QXUvEcAtxfIanG+K1e5/xaR5iQCljEFrblvZC0LNjiWjrhz GyQ+ZLaMN1H70pcyw/aCux8sP6IbU90c/xLZx91RmFjFDRE0bY8SgyUcNo84HqAn euchBdMMhRHlrsPDVuKMPLDPcdciZpZqh9GfR+QO7AEY2DNB/sq+NExziTBIBvE3 4lt3Awe7wJLepRbqiJxLcJ2PK/CGDGRGzNbpGd7GExlxrcz/lARq087b8Zp1vUI= =MM6p -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sourcegarden GmbH HR: B-104357 Steuernummer: 37/167/21214 USt-ID: DE814784953 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Mario Scheliga, Rene Otto Bank: Deutsche Bank, BLZ: 10070024, KTO: 0810929 Schoenhauser Allee 51, 10437 Berlin
Re: [gentoo-user] Hello All
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:18:38 -0500, Neal Hogan wrote: I'd start a new thread ;-) I'd avoid top-posting :P -- Neil Bothwick Genius is 99% inspiration and 2% arithmetic signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Re: 2.6.34 kernel compile error: DRM problem?
I tried to update my laptop and desktop to 2.6.34 but compilation fails with this error: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c: In function 'i915_switcheroo_can_switch': drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c:1419: error: invalid operands to binary == (have 'atomic_t' and 'int') or: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c: In function 'nouveau_switcheroo_can_switch': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c:394: error: invalid operands to binary == (have 'atomic_t' and 'int') They compile if I disable DRM. I've tried with and without CONFIG_VGA_SWITCHEROO with the same result. Does anyone know how to fix this? I'm trying to use hardened-sources-2.6.34 from the anarchy overlay on both systems. - Grant Any idea on this guys? - Grant
[gentoo-user] xkb definitions
Are there guides on making custom xkb layout(s)? I want to use a custom phonetic Russian layout without requiring a UTF-8 keyboard tr/iconv equivalent (echo qwerty | kbtr -f qwerty -t yazherty) -- Andrey Vul begin-base64 600 sig bXNuLCBob21lOiBhbmRyZXkudnVsQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ0KdSBvZiB0OiBhbmRyZXkudnVsQHV0b3Jv bnRvLmNhDQpzbXMsIHZvaWNlbWFpbDogNDE2MzAzOTkyMw0K ` end
Re: [gentoo-user] Boot hangs after install, no error
On Sunday 27 June 2010 10:50:55 Peter Humphrey wrote: On Saturday 26 June 2010 18:31:05 James Wall wrote: You could also check out Pappy's Kernel Seeds at http://www.kernel-seeds.org.org/ I will - thanks. Turned out it was much simpler than kernel config - it was BOINC. Now all I have to do is to find more suitable parameters for it on a 4-core box. -- Rgds Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.
[gentoo-user] Re: (II) NV(0): Setting screen physical size to 508 x 317
On 07/15/2010 11:03 PM, Erik wrote: 2010-07-16 01:51, walt skrev: On 07/15/2010 02:15 AM, Erik wrote: ...This is the new Dell vostro|1720 from November, that replaced the old INSPIRON|8600 aquired 5 years earlier... I feel as if I'm reading a post that I selected at random from the middle of a long thread with lots of previous questions and answers that I can't see. I've never heard of either of those products. Maybe someone else knows what they are? Do not worry about not knowing about the products that I mentioned in the parenthesis in the last paragraph (they are just some laptops with differend graphic cards built in). Ah, I understand now. I was expecting the information to be relevant. You may know enough to help if you are familiar with Xorg, in particular the driver called NV (as the first 2 lines of my post shows)... I know a little about it. It is no longer maintained by xorg or nvidia, so that may be part of the problem if you are using recent nvidia hardware. A commonly asked question is does it work as expected with the vesa driver? (Vesa does not include 2D/3D acceleration, obviously, but it should at least give you correct results for an ordinary console.) The open-source 'nv' driver has been replaced by the open-source 'nouveau' driver, which is still very much a work in progress. I'm using it just to experiment -- I don't need 2D/3D acceleration, but maybe you do. If so, you need to use nvidia's proprietary 'nvidia' driver because it's the only choice you have at present. All of the drivers I mentioned are in gentoo portage in the xf86-video-* series. nouveau suppport in the kernel needs a bit of annoying fiddling with the kernel config file to get it right. I can help with that if you want to try it.
[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Any centralized documentation on qemu-kvm?
On 07/15/2010 09:13 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:15:59PM -0700, walt wrote Well, wait a sec. I track both qemu and qemu-kvm from their git repositories rather than the gentoo packages, so YMMV. [...deletia...] qemu-kvm does not supply a command named 'qemu', so there is no name conflict in that particular case. Gentoo seems to differ... waltd...@i3 ~ $ equery belongs `which qemu` [ Searching for file(s) /usr/bin/qemu in *... ] app-emulation/qemu-kvm-0.12.4-r1 (/usr/bin/qemu) Interesting. Maybe the gentoo packages add a wrapper script to allow both to be installed in /usr/bin? Is /usr/bin/qemu a binary, or a script?
[gentoo-user] Re: (II) NV(0): Setting screen physical size to 508 x 317
On 07/16/2010 01:14 AM, Erik wrote: ...The actual hardware is reported by lspci as 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G96 [GeForce 9600M GS] (rev a1). That seems to be very new hardware. I'm using xf86-video-nouveau-0.0.16_pre20100615, and in my /var/log/Xorg.0.log I see: (II) NOUVEAU driver for NVIDIA chipset families : RIVA TNT(NV04) RIVA TNT2 (NV05) GeForce 256 (NV10) GeForce 2 (NV11, NV15) GeForce 4MX (NV17, NV18) GeForce 3 (NV20) GeForce 4Ti (NV25, NV28) GeForce FX (NV3x) GeForce 6 (NV4x) GeForce 7 (G7x) GeForce 8 (G8x) -- oops! stops at GF8 (II) Primary Device is: PCI 0...@00:00:0
