Re: [gentoo-user] Show ebuild date/time in emerge --pretend output

2014-04-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:30:43 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:

> One of the things I do to minimize getting bit by newly released buggy 
> ebuilds is to wait a few days after a new update is available before 
> updating...

Isn't that what the stable tree is for?
 
> This works well, and has saved me some serious pain more than once, but 
> it can be a pain to keep up with the updates sometimes...
> 
> What would be really helpful would be if the emerge --pretend output 
> could show the date (and time?) that the new ebuild was made
> available...

You could write a script that runs emerge -ublah @world, parses the
output and then checks the timestamps of the ebuilds. It could then
filter packages based on the age of the ebuild, instead of showing a date
and letting you do the work.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

All things being equal, fat people use more soap.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Show ebuild date/time in emerge --pretend output

2014-04-11 Thread the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 04/11/14 17:30, Tanstaafl wrote:
> What would be really helpful would be if the emerge --pretend
> output could show the date (and time?) that the new ebuild was made
> available...

I thought of something like this, but in emerge --search summary.
Could be nice to have such info.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTR/fuAAoJEK64IL1uI2haKwUH/i9soO5yNcsP9iARgbrkP/0D
jmZPVzdqgN2K4WwSE8ZPgCNdBNuAYwI+nFe/mjcQp7wp+CQXnOyRPrKgSQUiDjxn
rDonCGqVmE15fQDAYJdapUxcsfCeuc3VUB1tA/j9A8XeTHqu5FO2hsMs0RcTsxv/
4PDI8hSbB64Ol1n4lDgaoP65gUFy54C6w611LBE8y/fj0+bwlfrUZFk+Cn+l+ekZ
hap8+sCR2pZVTuAc9vbQ/cc0J6C9+DDA+fQNLhGoa8P+pX9U2cbgsVwDHCNnhpRV
CxgnTAtFDxf0vDJZk4Xi9l9/Ny8FcIPs54W+wOYCycA5X4UxPZKi4l5hl54kSKM=
=W/uy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



[gentoo-user] Show ebuild date/time in emerge --pretend output

2014-04-11 Thread Tanstaafl

Hi all,

I'm wondering if this is even feasible before I go open a 
bug/enhancement request for portage for this...


One of the things I do to minimize getting bit by newly released buggy 
ebuilds is to wait a few days after a new update is available before 
updating...


This works well, and has saved me some serious pain more than once, but 
it can be a pain to keep up with the updates sometimes...


What would be really helpful would be if the emerge --pretend output 
could show the date (and time?) that the new ebuild was made available...


ie, instead of:


myhost : Fri Apr 11, 07:45:44 : ~
 # emerge -pvuDN world

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U  ] media-libs/libpng-1.6.10:0/16 [1.6.8:0/16] USE="-apng (-neon) 
-static-libs" ABI_X86="(64) (-32) (-x32)" 878 kB

Total: 1 package (1 upgrade), Size of downloads: 878 kB
myhost : Fri Apr 11, 09:08:03 : ~
 #


something like:


myhost : Fri Apr 11, 07:45:44 : ~
 # emerge -pvuDN world

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U  ] media-libs/libpng-1.6.10:0/16 [1.6.8:0/16, released 4/11/14 at 13:11 am] 
USE="-apng (-neon) -static-libs" ABI_X86="(64) (-32) (-x32)" 878 kB

Total: 1 package (1 upgrade), Size of downloads: 878 kB
myhost : Fri Apr 11, 09:08:03 : ~
 #


Of course I don't care exactly where or how the date/time is displayed, 
just that it is there...


So... is this feasible (without a lot of hard work)?

Thanks,

Charles



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: 'Heartbleed' bug

2014-04-11 Thread Philip Webb
140410 walt wrote:
> Anyone here really understand the underlying principles?

There's an excellent description of the bug + the fix here :

http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2014/04/attack-of-week-openssl-heartbleed.html

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca