Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dec-terminal fonts
On Friday, September 11, 2015 12:07:45 PM Harry Putnam wrote: > "Walter Dnes"writes: > > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 05:04:30PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote > >> I've got to liking this font: > >> -dec-terminal-medium-r-normal--14-140-75-75-c-80-iso8859-1 > >> > >> But, after checking with xlsfonts... I don't see it available > >> > >> Can anyone tell me which font package would have -dec-termainal [...] > >> fonts? > > > > Maybe media-fonts/font-dec-misc ? An alternative option might be > > media-fonts/terminus-font > > Thanks, that first sure looks like it should be the one. When I > searched with `eix' looking for dec a couple days ago... I somehow, > probably thru operator error, did not uncover it ... although I easily > find it now. > > There must be some other problems > > I happened to have checked the output of xlsfonts|wc -l, which showed > 1513 > before installing both of those above. > > Once they were installed I do not find any dec-terminal fonts but also > `xlsfonts|wc -l' still shows 1513 > > I thought I had noticed that count staying the same earlier when I > installed the pkg thelma mentioned; but never verified before and > after like I did now. > > qlist font-dec-misc > /usr/share/doc/font-dec-misc-1.0.3/ChangeLog.bz2 > /usr/share/fonts/misc/decsess.pcf.gz > /usr/share/fonts/misc/deccurs.pcf.gz > > And terminus-font has too many files to list here > qlist terminus-font|wc -l >288 > > Surely the number recorded in xlsfonts should rise eh? > > PS - For the record eix showed neither package you posted to be > installed prior to the installations I performed a few minutes ago, > yet no increase in number of fonts > > Am I wrong to expect xslfonts to show what I have installed? I think that's a console font, not X. How did you get to liking it? If from another distro you can: 1. Find the package name on that distro and see if you can find a similar named package on portage. 2. Find the upstream package name and grep the portage tree for the name part of that file. 3. Grab the font from the other distro and install manually to /usr/local or (I think) ~/.local. If you use kde it has a nice interface for managing fonts on system settings. 4. Make an ebuild for it. -- Fernando Rodriguez
[gentoo-user] systemd very slow to compile?
My very old and slow ~amd64 machine took 3 hours and 45-minutes to compile systemd-226 today. I was curious to know why it was taking so long to finish, so I used 'top' to see what was happening. Turns out that two instances of 'sh' were each using 15-30% of CPU for a total of 30-60% (the machine has two CPUs). cc1 never even showed up in 'top' although the compiler was obviously compiling code because the build did eventually finish. I tried the same on a faster 4-core machine and I could see much the same thing happening during the systemd build. Can anyone else reproduce what I'm seeing? Is this 'normal'?
Re: [gentoo-user] Haskell stack
Hello, On Sun, 06 Sep 2015, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >On 09/06/2015 10:39 PM, David Haller wrote: >> Can anyone reproduce this problem? I did not have _any_ haskell >> package installed so far. >> >> Should I open a bug? Or just wait a couple of days, sync, and try >> again without the masks? > >Yes please open a bug. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=559988 I left ghc installed, as that had nothing to do with those conflicts. The packages pulled in by the conflicting ones on a "clean" system is so long I chose not to bother to prune the dep-tree right down from pandoc ;) For whatever reason, adding the attachment did not work for me. Oh, and yes, I did resync portage about Sep 8 18:00 UTC (or later) yet again before getting the data for the bug, almost the same problem, but dev-haskell/tls seems to have disappeared from the conflicts, ISTR also dev-haskell/network. So it seems to be worked on already. But I guess it might be nice to have a clean slate as mine and and example like pandoc to find those hidden dep-conflicts ;) So now, there's a list. >> PS: does haskell have no dynamic libraries? > >Historically no, but it's getting better. Ah. Thanks for the enlightenment :) -dnh -- Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their important stuff on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;) -- Linus Torvalds
Re: [gentoo-user] dec-terminal fonts
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 05:04:30PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote > I've got to liking this font: > -dec-terminal-medium-r-normal--14-140-75-75-c-80-iso8859-1 > > But, after checking with xlsfonts... I don't see it available > > Can anyone tell me which font package would have -dec-termainal [...] > fonts? Maybe media-fonts/font-dec-misc ? An alternative option might be media-fonts/terminus-font -- Walter DnesI don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications
[gentoo-user] Re: dec-terminal fonts
"Walter Dnes"writes: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 05:04:30PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote >> I've got to liking this font: >> -dec-terminal-medium-r-normal--14-140-75-75-c-80-iso8859-1 >> >> But, after checking with xlsfonts... I don't see it available >> >> Can anyone tell me which font package would have -dec-termainal [...] >> fonts? > > Maybe media-fonts/font-dec-misc ? An alternative option might be > media-fonts/terminus-font Thanks, that first sure looks like it should be the one. When I searched with `eix' looking for dec a couple days ago... I somehow, probably thru operator error, did not uncover it ... although I easily find it now. There must be some other problems I happened to have checked the output of xlsfonts|wc -l, which showed 1513 before installing both of those above. Once they were installed I do not find any dec-terminal fonts but also `xlsfonts|wc -l' still shows 1513 I thought I had noticed that count staying the same earlier when I installed the pkg thelma mentioned; but never verified before and after like I did now. qlist font-dec-misc /usr/share/doc/font-dec-misc-1.0.3/ChangeLog.bz2 /usr/share/fonts/misc/decsess.pcf.gz /usr/share/fonts/misc/deccurs.pcf.gz And terminus-font has too many files to list here qlist terminus-font|wc -l 288 Surely the number recorded in xlsfonts should rise eh? PS - For the record eix showed neither package you posted to be installed prior to the installations I performed a few minutes ago, yet no increase in number of fonts Am I wrong to expect xslfonts to show what I have installed?