Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.27 is broken
On 10/30/2018 12:52 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
> NB above : the error you cite is '4' :
> this shows there are other errors '1' '2' '3' above, which are more important.
> It would help if you find them & report them to the list.
Thanks, but that's the whole gcc output I got.
BTW the code for this is:
$ cat main.c
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
printf("hello world\n");
return 0;
}
Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.27 is broken
181030 the wrote: > I have upgraded to sys-libs/glibc-2.27-r6 and it broke the system. > I can't even compile a hello world test program in c. > I always get the following linking error: > $ gcc main.c -o main.elf > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../../../lib64/crtn.o(a.debug_info+0x10003): > reloc against `*UND*': error 4 > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: > final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > When I try to install something it fails during configuration > at compiler sanity check. I updated to this version of Glibc 181027 & emerged other pkgs successfully. I don't use the 'multiarch' USE flag. > Should I report this as a bug or is there's something wrong with me ? I'm sure there's nothing wrong with you (smile), but there mb a USE flag or similar which needs changing. NB above : the error you cite is '4' : this shows there are other errors '1' '2' '3' above, which are more important. It would help if you find them & report them to the list. No doubt others will offer more detailed advice. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
[gentoo-user] glibc-2.27 is broken
Hello, I have upgraded to sys-libs/glibc-2.27-r6 and it broke the system. I can't even compile a hello world test program in c. I always get the following linking error: $ gcc main.c -o main.elf /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../../../lib64/crtn.o(a.debug_info+0x10003): reloc against `*UND*': error 4 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status When I try to install something it fails during configuration at compiler sanity check. Should I report this as a bug or is there's something wrong with me? System info: Binutils 2.30-r2 gcc 7.3.0 # emerge -pvq '=sys-devel/gcc-7.3.0-r3' [ebuild R ] sys-devel/gcc-7.3.0-r3 USE="cilk cxx fortran go graphite (multilib) nls nptl openmp pch pgo* (pie) sanitize ssp vtv (-altivec) -debug -doc (-fixed-point) (-hardened) (-jit) (-libssp) -mpx -objc -objc++ -objc-gc -regression-test -vanilla" # emerge --info '=sys-libs/glibc-2.27-r6' Portage 2.3.49 (python 3.6.5-final-0, default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop, gcc-7.3.0, glibc-2.27-r6, 4.12.12-gentoo x86_64) = System Settings = System uname: Linux-4.12.12-gentoo-x86_64-AMD_Opteron-tm-_Processor_6320-with-gentoo-2.4.1 KiB Mem:32921172 total, 30174684 free KiB Swap: 33303572 total, 33303572 free Timestamp of repository gentoo: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 22:00:01 + Head commit of repository gentoo: 0d1f9865d36f3c4efac70f236d962901a113b8b4 sh bash 4.4_p12 ld GNU ld (Gentoo 2.30 p2) 2.30.0 app-shells/bash: 4.4_p12::gentoo dev-lang/perl:5.24.3-r1::gentoo dev-lang/python: 2.7.14-r1::gentoo, 3.4.5::gentoo, 3.5.5::gentoo, 3.6.5::gentoo dev-util/cmake: 3.9.6::gentoo dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.29.2::gentoo sys-apps/baselayout: 2.4.1-r2::gentoo sys-apps/openrc: 0.34.11::gentoo sys-apps/sandbox: 2.13::gentoo sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13::gentoo, 2.69-r4::gentoo sys-devel/automake: 1.12.6::gentoo, 1.14.1::gentoo, 1.15.1-r2::gentoo sys-devel/binutils: 2.26.1::gentoo, 2.28.1::gentoo, 2.29.1-r1::gentoo, 2.30-r2::gentoo sys-devel/gcc:4.9.3::gentoo, 5.4.0-r3::gentoo, 6.4.0-r1::gentoo, 7.3.0-r3::gentoo sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.8-r1::gentoo sys-devel/libtool:2.4.6-r3::gentoo sys-devel/make: 4.2.1-r3::gentoo sys-kernel/linux-headers: 4.13::gentoo (virtual/os-headers) sys-libs/glibc: 2.27-r6::gentoo Repositories: gentoo location: /usr/portage sync-type: rsync sync-uri: rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage priority: -1000 sync-rsync-extra-opts: sync-rsync-verify-metamanifest: yes sync-rsync-verify-jobs: 1 sync-rsync-verify-max-age: 24 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA" CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-march=native -mno-tbm -mno-bmi -mno-avx -mno-aes -mno-sha -mno-fma -mno-xop -mno-lwp -mno-abm -mno-3dnow -mno-sse3 -O2 -pipe" CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/share/gnupg/qualified.txt" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/dconf /etc/env.d /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/gentoo-release /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/sandbox.d /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/language.dat.d /etc/texmf/language.def.d /etc/texmf/updmap.d /etc/texmf/web2c" CXXFLAGS="-march=native -mno-tbm -mno-bmi -mno-avx -mno-aes -mno-sha -mno-fma -mno-xop -mno-lwp -mno-abm -mno-3dnow -mno-sse3 -O2 -pipe" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" ENV_UNSET="DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS DISPLAY PERL5LIB PERL5OPT PERLPREFIX PERL_CORE PERL_MB_OPT PERL_MM_OPT XAUTHORITY XDG_CACHE_HOME XDG_CONFIG_HOME XDG_DATA_HOME XDG_RUNTIME_DIR" FCFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" FEATURES="assume-digests binpkg-logs config-protect-if-modified distlocks ebuild-locks fixlafiles merge-sync multilib-strict news parallel-fetch preserve-libs protect-owned sandbox sfperms strict unknown-features-warn unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans userfetch userpriv usersandbox usersync xattr" FFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://mirrors.tera-byte.com/pub/gentoo http://gentoo.mirrors.tera-byte.com/ rsync://mirrors.tera-byte.com/gentoo" LANG="en_US.utf8" LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed" MAKEOPTS="-j9" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT="/" PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --omit-dir-times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --stats --human-readable --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local --exclude=/packages --exclude=/.git" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" USE="X a52 aac acl acpi alsa amd64 berkdb bluetooth branding bzip2 cairo cdda cdr cli consolekit crypt cups cxx dbus dri dts dvd dvdr emacs emboss encode exif fam ffmpeg flac fortran gdbm gif glamor gpm gtk iconv ipv6 jpeg latex lcms ldap libnotify libti
[gentoo-user] subscribe
subscribe
Re: [gentoo-user] portage sandbox path-depth limit ?
Den 30. okt. 2018 10:01, skrev Mick: > On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 06:30:23 GMT Håkon Alstadheim wrote: >> I'm having fun enabling "test" in FEATURES on my gentoo-desktop. One >> interesting failure, that brings to mind build failures I have had in >> the past: >> >> Building sys-apps/mlocate-0.26-r2, I get >> >> 43: updatedb: Very deep hierarchy FAILED >> (updatedb.at:261) >> >> Trying to reproduce, as root I do "make check" in the work/mlocate-0.26/ >> , and the test passes. >> >> 43: updatedb: Very deep hierarchy ok >> >> I'd really like to get to the bottom of this, as I believe it must have >> the same root-cause as issues I have had compiling large packages such >> as firefox. >> >> Re-running both the emerge and the make check, I get the same results. >> emerge fails, make check succeeds. I made a local copy of the ebuild and >> inserted a "ulimit -a" in pre_src_test. >> >> ulimit from root-shell: >> >> # ulimit -a >> core file size (blocks, -c) unlimited >> data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited >> scheduling priority (-e) 0 >> file size (blocks, -f) unlimited >> pending signals (-i) 59958 >> max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 16384 >> max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited >> open files (-n) 1024 >> pipe size(512 bytes, -p) 8 >> POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200 >> real-time priority (-r) 0 >> stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192 >> cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited >> max user processes (-u) 1 >> virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited >> file locks (-x) unlimited >> >> ulimit from emerge: > Source compiled. >> core file size (blocks, -c) unlimited >> data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited >> scheduling priority (-e) 0 >> file size (blocks, -f) unlimited >> pending signals (-i) 59958 >> max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 16384 >> max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited >> open files (-n) 1024 >> pipe size(512 bytes, -p) 8 >> POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200 >> real-time priority (-r) 0 >> stack size (kbytes, -s) 9788 >> cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited >> max user processes (-u) 1 >> virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited >> file locks (-x) unlimited >> > Test phase: sys-apps/mlocate-0.26-r2 >> I have plenty of space in my portage temp directory (/pt): >> >> # df -hT ./ >> Filsystem Type Størrelse Brukt Tilgj. Bruk% Montert på >> /dev/xvdc ext4 163G 8,0G 147G6% /pt >> >> Portage temp is at /pt due to the earlier mentioned issues with firefox. >> >> At my wits end here. Anyone ? > I have not looked or used the test FEATURES of portage, but have also noticed > over time certain packages fail to build on machines with low RAM. As low > here I consider anything less than 4G. It seems each thread is now consuming > so much memory they cumulatively use up all RAM available and then start > swapping endlessly until the compilation invariably fails. Increasingly more > and more packages have been suffering from this, the last two I noticed are > qtwebkit and qtwebengine. > > My solution has been to create a package.env file in which I specify MAKEOPTS > limiting the number of jobs and average load for any of these packages which > chew up all the RAM. Memory should not be a problem here. Fails with only that one emerge running, succeeds if run directly as root, or with FEATURES="-sandbox -usersandbox". Memory is >14GB: # vmstat procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io -system-- --cpu- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st 3 4 28416 6904608 174112 4616144 0 0 65 266 13 4 10 2 84 4 0
Re: [gentoo-user] TLSv1.3 with apache?
Am 30.10.18 um 13:01 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Is that possible with gentoo already? Simply adding "SSLProtocol TLSv1.3" to my vhost did not work out here, pls point me to some info, thanks ;-) Ah, I see, only with >=openssl-1.1.1, correct? I will simply wait
[gentoo-user] TLSv1.3 with apache?
Is that possible with gentoo already? Simply adding "SSLProtocol TLSv1.3" to my vhost did not work out here, pls point me to some info, thanks ;-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Android studio emulator without PulseAudio
"Davyd McColl" writes: > Would apulse not do the trick? > > -d > On 2018-10-30 11:15:14, Pouru Lasse wrote: > > Is it possible to run the emulator included with Android Studio without > having PulseAudio installed? When I try to launch the emulator, it > instantly crashes because it can't find libpulse.so.0. My QEMU package > is compiled without PulseAudio, but Android SDK comes with its own > version of QEMU. > > Setting QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=none, as instructed in Android Studio manual, > seems to have no effect, and the Gentoo wiki page on Android Studio just > tells you to install PulseAudio. > > I don't mind having no audio at all, I just don't want to install > PulseAudio. Any options? > > - Lasse I already had apulse installed, but apparently the emulator doesn't look for the library in the right directory. I copied all the libpulse.* files under ~/Android/Sdk/emulator/lib/ and ~/Android/Sdk/emulator/lib64/ and now it seems to work. - Lasse
Re: [gentoo-user] Android studio emulator without PulseAudio
Would apulse not do the trick? -d On 2018-10-30 11:15:14, Pouru Lasse wrote: Is it possible to run the emulator included with Android Studio without having PulseAudio installed? When I try to launch the emulator, it instantly crashes because it can't find libpulse.so.0. My QEMU package is compiled without PulseAudio, but Android SDK comes with its own version of QEMU. Setting QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=none, as instructed in Android Studio manual, seems to have no effect, and the Gentoo wiki page on Android Studio just tells you to install PulseAudio. I don't mind having no audio at all, I just don't want to install PulseAudio. Any options? - Lasse
[gentoo-user] Android studio emulator without PulseAudio
Is it possible to run the emulator included with Android Studio without having PulseAudio installed? When I try to launch the emulator, it instantly crashes because it can't find libpulse.so.0. My QEMU package is compiled without PulseAudio, but Android SDK comes with its own version of QEMU. Setting QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=none, as instructed in Android Studio manual, seems to have no effect, and the Gentoo wiki page on Android Studio just tells you to install PulseAudio. I don't mind having no audio at all, I just don't want to install PulseAudio. Any options? - Lasse
Re: [gentoo-user] portage sandbox path-depth limit ?
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 06:30:23 GMT Håkon Alstadheim wrote: > I'm having fun enabling "test" in FEATURES on my gentoo-desktop. One > interesting failure, that brings to mind build failures I have had in > the past: > > Building sys-apps/mlocate-0.26-r2, I get > > 43: updatedb: Very deep hierarchy FAILED > (updatedb.at:261) > > Trying to reproduce, as root I do "make check" in the work/mlocate-0.26/ > , and the test passes. > > 43: updatedb: Very deep hierarchy ok > > I'd really like to get to the bottom of this, as I believe it must have > the same root-cause as issues I have had compiling large packages such > as firefox. > > Re-running both the emerge and the make check, I get the same results. > emerge fails, make check succeeds. I made a local copy of the ebuild and > inserted a "ulimit -a" in pre_src_test. > > ulimit from root-shell: > > # ulimit -a > core file size (blocks, -c) unlimited > data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited > scheduling priority (-e) 0 > file size (blocks, -f) unlimited > pending signals (-i) 59958 > max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 16384 > max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited > open files (-n) 1024 > pipe size(512 bytes, -p) 8 > POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200 > real-time priority (-r) 0 > stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192 > cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited > max user processes (-u) 1 > virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited > file locks (-x) unlimited > > ulimit from emerge: > >>> Source compiled. > > core file size (blocks, -c) unlimited > data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited > scheduling priority (-e) 0 > file size (blocks, -f) unlimited > pending signals (-i) 59958 > max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 16384 > max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited > open files (-n) 1024 > pipe size(512 bytes, -p) 8 > POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200 > real-time priority (-r) 0 > stack size (kbytes, -s) 9788 > cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited > max user processes (-u) 1 > virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited > file locks (-x) unlimited > > >>> Test phase: sys-apps/mlocate-0.26-r2 > > I have plenty of space in my portage temp directory (/pt): > > # df -hT ./ > Filsystem Type Størrelse Brukt Tilgj. Bruk% Montert på > /dev/xvdc ext4 163G 8,0G 147G6% /pt > > Portage temp is at /pt due to the earlier mentioned issues with firefox. > > At my wits end here. Anyone ? I have not looked or used the test FEATURES of portage, but have also noticed over time certain packages fail to build on machines with low RAM. As low here I consider anything less than 4G. It seems each thread is now consuming so much memory they cumulatively use up all RAM available and then start swapping endlessly until the compilation invariably fails. Increasingly more and more packages have been suffering from this, the last two I noticed are qtwebkit and qtwebengine. My solution has been to create a package.env file in which I specify MAKEOPTS limiting the number of jobs and average load for any of these packages which chew up all the RAM. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
