Re: [gentoo-user] Why do we add the local host name to the 127.0.0.1 / ::1 entry in the /etc/hosts file?

2021-02-21 Thread Andrew Udvare


> On 2021-02-21, at 17:23, Grant Taylor  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm reading Kerberos - The Definitive Guide[1] and it makes the following 
> comment:
> 
>> And to make matters worse, some Unix systems map their own hostname to 
>> 127.0.0.1 (the loopback IP address).
> 
> This makes me think that the local host name /shouldn't/ be included in the 
> 127.0.0.1 (or ::1) entry in the /etc/hosts file.
> 
> However, according to the Gentoo AMD64 Handbook[2], we are supposed to add 
> the local host name to the 127.0.0.1 (and ::1) entry in the /etc/hosts file.
> 
> Will someone please explain why the Gentoo AMD64 Handbook ~> Gentoo (at 
> large) says to add the local host name to the 127.0.0.1 (or ::1) entry in the 
> /etc/hosts file?  What was the thought process behind that?

The thought process is the same as the guide you are reading. 
https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/kerberos-the-definitive/0596004036/ch04s03.html

It says in the last paragraph on this page that the /etc/hosts file should have 
the '127.0.0.1 localhost ' (last part is definitely optional) and 
then that the next entry should have the outer IP address mapped to the FQDN.

-- 
Andrew


[gentoo-user] Why do we add the local host name to the 127.0.0.1 / ::1 entry in the /etc/hosts file?

2021-02-21 Thread Grant Taylor

Hi,

I'm reading Kerberos - The Definitive Guide[1] and it makes the 
following comment:


And to make matters worse, some Unix systems map their own hostname 
to 127.0.0.1 (the loopback IP address).


This makes me think that the local host name /shouldn't/ be included in 
the 127.0.0.1 (or ::1) entry in the /etc/hosts file.


However, according to the Gentoo AMD64 Handbook[2], we are supposed to 
add the local host name to the 127.0.0.1 (and ::1) entry in the 
/etc/hosts file.


Will someone please explain why the Gentoo AMD64 Handbook ~> Gentoo (at 
large) says to add the local host name to the 127.0.0.1 (or ::1) entry 
in the /etc/hosts file?  What was the thought process behind that?


Incidentally, adding the local host name to the 127.0.0.1 (or ::1) entry 
in the /etc/hosts file causes "hostname -i" to return 127.0.0.1 instead 
of the IP address bound to the network interface.


Thank you for any input you can provide.

[1] Kerberos: The Definitive Guide (p. 109). O'Reilly Media. Kindle Edition.
[2] 
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Installation/System#The_hosts_file




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die