Re: [gentoo-user] postfix - error sending mail
On 6/21/23 15:25, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: I configured remote systems postfix to relay email via my connection, the setting on all 3-systems are identical in postfix/main.cf Once system is working correctly, relaying the mail via my "relayhost" Two other system giving me an error in log file: "External senders are prohibited to send to local recipients without authentication" Authentication is the same as on the first system that is working. Though, I notice that the first system mail.log file has: from= The two other systems (that bounce the mail) have: from=<> Where is the setting for "from <>" I use command line to test the mail. When I use: mailto To: u...@destination.com Subject: testing i5 test EOT When I login as root and send this test mail; it it shows "from: r...@doamin.com" Where is the "root"comes from? How to change it, control it?
[gentoo-user] postfix - error sending mail
I configured remote systems postfix to relay email via my connection, the setting on all 3-systems are identical in postfix/main.cf Once system is working correctly, relaying the mail via my "relayhost" Two other system giving me an error in log file: "External senders are prohibited to send to local recipients without authentication" Authentication is the same as on the first system that is working. Though, I notice that the first system mail.log file has: from= The two other systems (that bounce the mail) have: from=<> Where is the setting for "from <>" I use command line to test the mail. -- Thelma
RE: [gentoo-user] Something's actively deleting libssl.so.1.1 on my system!
>-Original Message- >From: Alan Grimes >Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 11:01 PM >To: Gentoo User >Subject: [gentoo-user] Something's actively deleting libssl.so.1.1 on my >system! > >CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Do not click links or open attachments >unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > >Having manually dropped a stage3 libssl into my system, it has disappeared >again!! What in god's name is going on? have I been virused > > >-- >Beware of Zombies. =O >#EggCrisis #BlackWinter >White is the new Kulak. >Powers are not rights. You could always chattr +i it and see what blows up... LMP
Re: [gentoo-user] strange message from hda_intel today
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 06:14:36 -0400, Dale wrote: > > John Covici wrote: > > Hi. I got a message from my sound card module today, but I can't find > > what to change -- seems not to be a kernel config. > > snd_hda_intel :00:1f.3: IRQ timing workaround is activated for > > card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. > > > > What the heck is that? > > > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions. > > > > > I'm clueless what this means. I just used a search engine. Here goes. > > > bdl_pos_adj > > Specifies the DMA IRQ timing delay in samples. Passing -1 will make > the driver to choose the appropriate value based on the controller chip. > > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/sound/alsa-configuration.html#module-snd-hda-intel > > > and this: > > > HD-Audio Controller > DMA-Position Problem > > The most common problem of the controller is the inaccurate DMA pointer > reporting. The DMA pointer for playback and capture can be read in two > ways, either via a LPIB register or via a position-buffer map. As > default the driver tries to read from the io-mapped position-buffer, and > falls back to LPIB if the position-buffer appears dead. However, this > detection isn't perfect on some devices. In such a case, you can change > the default method via position_fix option. > > position_fix=1 means to use LPIB method explicitly. position_fix=2 means > to use the position-buffer. position_fix=3 means to use a combination of > both methods, needed for some VIA controllers. The capture stream > position is corrected by comparing both LPIB and position-buffer values. > position_fix=4 is another combination available for all controllers, and > uses LPIB for the playback and the position-buffer for the capture > streams. position_fix=5 is specific to Intel platforms, so far, for > Skylake and onward. It applies the delay calculation for the precise > position reporting. position_fix=6 is to correct the position with the > fixed FIFO size, mainly targeted for the recent AMD controllers. 0 is > the default value for all other controllers, the automatic check and > fallback to LPIB as described in the above. If you get a problem of > repeated sounds, this option might help. > > In addition to that, every controller is known to be broken regarding > the wake-up timing. It wakes up a few samples before actually processing > the data on the buffer. This caused a lot of problems, for example, with > ALSA dmix or JACK. Since 2.6.27 kernel, the driver puts an artificial > delay to the wake up timing. This delay is controlled via bdl_pos_adj > option. > > When bdl_pos_adj is a negative value (as default), it's assigned to an > appropriate value depending on the controller chip. For Intel chips, > it'd be 1 while it'd be 32 for others. Usually this works. Only in case > it doesn't work and you get warning messages, you should change this > parameter to other values. > > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/sound/hd-audio/notes.html > > > Does that help any? Thanks, now to figure out which config file to put it in -- I will see if its in the module parameters. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici wb2una cov...@ccs.covici.com
Re: [gentoo-user] strange message from hda_intel today
John Covici wrote: > Hi. I got a message from my sound card module today, but I can't find > what to change -- seems not to be a kernel config. > snd_hda_intel :00:1f.3: IRQ timing workaround is activated for > card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. > > What the heck is that? > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions. > I'm clueless what this means. I just used a search engine. Here goes. bdl_pos_adj Specifies the DMA IRQ timing delay in samples. Passing -1 will make the driver to choose the appropriate value based on the controller chip. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/sound/alsa-configuration.html#module-snd-hda-intel and this: HD-Audio Controller DMA-Position Problem The most common problem of the controller is the inaccurate DMA pointer reporting. The DMA pointer for playback and capture can be read in two ways, either via a LPIB register or via a position-buffer map. As default the driver tries to read from the io-mapped position-buffer, and falls back to LPIB if the position-buffer appears dead. However, this detection isn't perfect on some devices. In such a case, you can change the default method via position_fix option. position_fix=1 means to use LPIB method explicitly. position_fix=2 means to use the position-buffer. position_fix=3 means to use a combination of both methods, needed for some VIA controllers. The capture stream position is corrected by comparing both LPIB and position-buffer values. position_fix=4 is another combination available for all controllers, and uses LPIB for the playback and the position-buffer for the capture streams. position_fix=5 is specific to Intel platforms, so far, for Skylake and onward. It applies the delay calculation for the precise position reporting. position_fix=6 is to correct the position with the fixed FIFO size, mainly targeted for the recent AMD controllers. 0 is the default value for all other controllers, the automatic check and fallback to LPIB as described in the above. If you get a problem of repeated sounds, this option might help. In addition to that, every controller is known to be broken regarding the wake-up timing. It wakes up a few samples before actually processing the data on the buffer. This caused a lot of problems, for example, with ALSA dmix or JACK. Since 2.6.27 kernel, the driver puts an artificial delay to the wake up timing. This delay is controlled via bdl_pos_adj option. When bdl_pos_adj is a negative value (as default), it's assigned to an appropriate value depending on the controller chip. For Intel chips, it'd be 1 while it'd be 32 for others. Usually this works. Only in case it doesn't work and you get warning messages, you should change this parameter to other values. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/sound/hd-audio/notes.html Does that help any? Dale :-) :-)
[gentoo-user] strange message from hda_intel today
Hi. I got a message from my sound card module today, but I can't find what to change -- seems not to be a kernel config. snd_hda_intel :00:1f.3: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. What the heck is that? Thanks in advance for any suggestions. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici wb2una cov...@ccs.covici.com
[gentoo-user] Something's actively deleting libssl.so.1.1 on my system!
Having manually dropped a stage3 libssl into my system, it has disappeared again!! What in god's name is going on? have I been virused -- Beware of Zombies. =O #EggCrisis #BlackWinter White is the new Kulak. Powers are not rights.
