Re: [gentoo-user] Successfully upgraded to new profile 23.0

2024-04-08 Thread William Kenworthy
I use a buildhost for each of the 4 architectures I manage - binary 
emtytree installs are not to bad.  However the initial build for low 
power arm systems is measured in multiple days (for just the initial 
toolchain, not hours :(.  Only minor problems so far though which is 
good.  At least it can build while online, unlike fresh installs which 
mean lots of downtime and more work for me in configuring.


BillK


On 9/4/24 05:14, Eli Schwartz wrote:

On 4/8/24 10:03 AM, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:

Greetings,

the upgrade on my old laptop  with two 2.7GHz  Dual-Core Skylake proces-
sors took slightly  more than 2 hours  for the manual upgrading of "bin-
utils", "gcc" and "glibc", and slightly more than 21.5 hours for the fi-
nal upgrade of "@world",  which had to process a total of 1061 packages.
I'm wondering whether  a fresh install  from a stage 3  "tar" ball would
have been faster?


If you're okay doing a fresh install from a stage3 tar, which is faster
at least to install the base system because it is all precompiled and
you are not building the packages yourself, then I would assume you're
also okay doing the update using the gentoo.org official binhost.

They're both just the binaries that Gentoo's release automation builds
for you. Extracting a bunch of gpkgs is much faster than compiling them,
and not too much slower than extracting a single stage3 tarball.

It also has the advantage that for amd64, more than just the stage3
package set can be sped up like this -- and you don't have to rebuild
the installation, recreate @world, backup and restore user data, etc.

Just enable the binhost and then do the same -e @world you were doing
without the binhost. :)



My first Gentoo installation  on this laptop  back in mid 2019 used pro-
file 17.1 (which is still marked "experimental", by the way).  Now, less
than five years later  this profile set is deprecated.   Is five years a
common intervall between enforced Gentoo profile upgrades?


Well, 13.0 -> 17.0 -> 17.1 -> 23.0 so I suppose you could say they are
fairly long intervals, yeah.

As far as it being marked experimental: it was dropped from stable
during the 23.0 announcement, but is being marked as stable again:

https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/35871

Rationale:

"""
Making 17.1 exp immediately gives the impression that it's formally
deprecated, which it isn't yet.
"""






Re: [gentoo-user] Successfully upgraded to new profile 23.0

2024-04-08 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 4/8/24 10:03 AM, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> the upgrade on my old laptop  with two 2.7GHz  Dual-Core Skylake proces-
> sors took slightly  more than 2 hours  for the manual upgrading of "bin-
> utils", "gcc" and "glibc", and slightly more than 21.5 hours for the fi-
> nal upgrade of "@world",  which had to process a total of 1061 packages.
> I'm wondering whether  a fresh install  from a stage 3  "tar" ball would
> have been faster?


If you're okay doing a fresh install from a stage3 tar, which is faster
at least to install the base system because it is all precompiled and
you are not building the packages yourself, then I would assume you're
also okay doing the update using the gentoo.org official binhost.

They're both just the binaries that Gentoo's release automation builds
for you. Extracting a bunch of gpkgs is much faster than compiling them,
and not too much slower than extracting a single stage3 tarball.

It also has the advantage that for amd64, more than just the stage3
package set can be sped up like this -- and you don't have to rebuild
the installation, recreate @world, backup and restore user data, etc.

Just enable the binhost and then do the same -e @world you were doing
without the binhost. :)


> My first Gentoo installation  on this laptop  back in mid 2019 used pro-
> file 17.1 (which is still marked "experimental", by the way).  Now, less
> than five years later  this profile set is deprecated.   Is five years a
> common intervall between enforced Gentoo profile upgrades?


Well, 13.0 -> 17.0 -> 17.1 -> 23.0 so I suppose you could say they are
fairly long intervals, yeah.

As far as it being marked experimental: it was dropped from stable
during the 23.0 announcement, but is being marked as stable again:

https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/35871

Rationale:

"""
Making 17.1 exp immediately gives the impression that it's formally
deprecated, which it isn't yet.
"""


-- 
Eli Schwartz


OpenPGP_0x84818A6819AF4A9B.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[gentoo-user] Steam and NFS, Fix for anyone also effected

2024-04-08 Thread Tsukasa Mcp_Reznor
So diskless clients and steam have had a bumpy road over the years, used to 
have to make a fakeflock.so to get around a locking bug.  Then awhile after 
that, I believe when Proton reached version 8+ there was a horrible 30+ seconds 
of idle waiting time added to every game before it even attempted to load.  The 
fix for that ended up being to mount a tmpfs over the runtime folder.

Since late January an update caused a new bug to appear, I've scoured 
everywhere many times over, and the only real info I ever found was a race 
condition existing that even very low latency networking would result in 
SteamWebHelper crashing with a popup, and all the choices did nothing.  So the 
only real choice was to either keep loading steam repeatedly and hope it worked 
(very low chances, maybe 1% for us here) or leave the popup alone and steam 
would continue to load, but in a crappy state, no friends, no sharing games, 
etc.

I've tried many combinations and discovered a solution, you no longer need 
fakeflock or tmpfs.

1.emerge dev-util/vmtouch
2. start steam, let it get to the crash popup, and pick to close exit steam 
(only have to do this once so that all the files are unpacked into the correct 
locations)
3. open your preferred terminal and cd 
/home/UserName/.local/share/Steam/ubuntu12_64
4. vmtouch -L ./ (that locks the contents in RAM, for me around 1G of data
5. run steam, now it'll load much faster and not have any issues.
6. after steam loads you may control-C in the terminal vmtouch has the files 
locked in to let standard kernel memory management go back to doing its awesome 
job of caching what it actually needs to.

Game on my fellow Gentoo Gaming Enthusiasts


Re: [gentoo-user] Successfully upgraded to new profile 23.0

2024-04-08 Thread Daniel Frey

On 4/8/24 07:03, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:

Greetings,

the upgrade on my old laptop  with two 2.7GHz  Dual-Core Skylake proces-
sors took slightly  more than 2 hours  for the manual upgrading of "bin-
utils", "gcc" and "glibc", and slightly more than 21.5 hours for the fi-
nal upgrade of "@world",  which had to process a total of 1061 packages.
I'm wondering whether  a fresh install  from a stage 3  "tar" ball would
have been faster?

My first Gentoo installation  on this laptop  back in mid 2019 used pro-
file 17.1 (which is still marked "experimental", by the way).  Now, less
than five years later  this profile set is deprecated.   Is five years a
common intervall between enforced Gentoo profile upgrades?

Sincerely,
   Rainer



I had to upgrade about 7 machines, and three wound up having weird 
troubles - so I did exactly that and started fresh on the rest. Working 
on the last one (my laptop) right now.


Dan



[gentoo-user] Successfully upgraded to new profile 23.0

2024-04-08 Thread Dr Rainer Woitok
Greetings,

the upgrade on my old laptop  with two 2.7GHz  Dual-Core Skylake proces-
sors took slightly  more than 2 hours  for the manual upgrading of "bin-
utils", "gcc" and "glibc", and slightly more than 21.5 hours for the fi-
nal upgrade of "@world",  which had to process a total of 1061 packages.
I'm wondering whether  a fresh install  from a stage 3  "tar" ball would
have been faster?

My first Gentoo installation  on this laptop  back in mid 2019 used pro-
file 17.1 (which is still marked "experimental", by the way).  Now, less
than five years later  this profile set is deprecated.   Is five years a
common intervall between enforced Gentoo profile upgrades?

Sincerely,
  Rainer



Re: [gentoo-user] System crash on "Detecting C compiler ABI info"

2024-04-08 Thread Paul Sopka

Hey Michael

Thank you for helping me. I have finally solved the issue by upgrading 
to kernel 6.8.4, see this: 
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1168150.html


Have a very nice week!

Regards

Nanderty