[gentoo-user] www-apps/mediawiki-1.14.1 Circular Dependencies with Math Use Flag
Hello, I'm getting dependencies issues with mediawiki when trying to install with the math use flag: oscar ~ # emerge -pv mediawiki These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild N] dev-lang/ocaml-3.10.2 USE=gdbm ncurses ocamlopt -X -emacs -latex -tk -xemacs 2,232 kB [ebuild N] dev-libs/zziplib-0.13.49-r1 USE=-sdl -test 640 kB [ebuild N] media-libs/openjpeg-1.3-r2 USE=-tools 982 kB [ebuild N] app-text/poppler-data-0.2.1 3,973 kB [ebuild N] dev-lang/lua-5.1.4 USE=deprecated readline -static 212 kB [ebuild N] dev-libs/poppler-0.10.7 USE=abiword poppler-data 1,496 kB [ebuild N] virtual/poppler-0.10.7 0 kB [ebuild N] app-text/texlive-core-2008-r5 USE=-X -doc -source -tk 23,278 kB [ebuild N] virtual/tex-base-0 0 kB [ebuild N] dev-texlive/texlive-documentation-base-2008 USE=-source 745 kB [ebuild N] dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008 USE=-doc -source 3,739 kB [ebuild N] dev-tex/mplib-1.110 USE=lua 1,522 kB [ebuild N] dev-tex/luatex-0.30.3 USE=-doc 6,724 kB [ebuild N] dev-texlive/texlive-latex-2008-r1 USE=-doc -source 952 kB [ebuild N] dev-texlive/texlive-genericrecommended-2008 USE=-doc -source 202 kB [ebuild N] dev-texlive/texlive-texinfo-2008 USE=-doc -source 77 kB [ebuild N] dev-texlive/texlive-latexrecommended-2008-r2 USE=-doc -source 971 kB [ebuild N] virtual/texi2dvi-0 0 kB [ebuild N] app-text/dvipng-1.12 USE=-test -truetype 165 kB [ebuild N] www-apps/mediawiki-1.14.1 USE=imagemagick math mysql ocamlopt vhosts -postgres 10,117 kB [blocks B ] dev-texlive/texlive-latexrecommended (dev-texlive/texlive-latexrecommended is blocking dev-tex/latex-unicode-20041017) Total: 20 packages (20 new), Size of downloads: 58,018 kB Conflict: 1 block (1 unsatisfied) oscar ~ # Any work around?
RE: [gentoo-user] www-apps/mediawiki-1.14.1 Circular Dependencies with Math Use Flag
Awesome. Thanks for the help... That did it. -Original Message- From: paul.hart...@gmail.com [mailto:paul.hart...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hartman Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 1:22 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] www-apps/mediawiki-1.14.1 Circular Dependencies with Math Use Flag On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Ryan Holtr...@ryanholt.net wrote: dev-tex/latex-unicode Perhaps try to unmerge that and try again
[gentoo-user] Writing to a 256MB Rom
Hey,Little bit of an odd question here. But Say I wanted to write to an imbedded 256MB Rom Drive. Specifically, I'd like to install a minimalistic Linux install onto a mini-server that contains only a ROM storage space How could I go about this?
Re: [gentoo-user] Writing to a 256MB Rom
Is there any difference between ROM and NVRam?I think I mis-spoke when I said ROM; because it's actually Non Volatile Ram.On 3/1/06, Franta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 15:00 -0500, Ryan Holt wrote: Hey, Little bit of an odd question here. But Say I wanted to write to an imbedded 256MB Rom Drive. Specifically, I'd like to install a minimalistic Linux install onto a mini-server that contains only a ROM storage space How could I go about this?IMHO You can't write to that device. ROM is an abbreviation for ReadOnly Memory ;))On The other hand... there is a lot of stuff about minimalistic Linux on Ggle out there.--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Writing to a 256MB Rom
Okays. So assuming it's NVRAM, is that something that I'm likely going to be able to write to without some type of equipment?On 3/1/06, Toby 'qubit' Cubitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 04:16:33PM -0500, Ryan Holt wrote: Is there any difference between ROM and NVRam?Yes. ROM is a WORM medium (write once, ready many times). The datastored in a PROM (programmable read only memory) is literally burnedin by applying high-voltage pulses to the chip. There's also EPROM (eraseable PROM) which can be erased by exposingthe chip to ultraviolet light, and EEPROM (electrically eraseablePROM). If we're being pedantic, ROM is a misnomer for these, sincethey're not really write once. NVRAM (non-volatile random access memory) is similar to EEPROM in someways: it can be written and erased many times, and maintains its dataeven when power is disconnected. MRAM, FRAM, etc. are forms of NVRAM. Flash memory is I believe a more modern form of EEPROM. Theyall differ in the physical technology used on the chip, and havedifferent properties, such as how many times the memory can be erasedand rewritten, how fast writing and reading is, etc. Also, Wikipedia says:...there is a convention to reserve the term EEPROM [for] byte-wisewritable memories compared to block-wise writable flash memories. I think I mis-spoke when I said ROM; because it's actually Non Volatile Ram. You *could* have meant PROM, but NVRAM sounds much more likely ;-)Toby--PhD StudentQuantum Information Theory groupMax Planck Institute for Quantum OpticsGarching, Germanyemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]web: www.dr-qubit.org--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Konqueror as an FTP Client
Thanks all for your help!Turns out that Kasablanca will work for me, gftp for some reason or another crashes, but Konqueror still can't work correctly; guess is it has something to do with that bug. On 2/16/06, Harm Geerts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 16 February 2006 02:05, Ryan Holt wrote: Hey, I'm trying to use Konqueror as an FTP client; problem is that it'll start uploading files but then my FTP server will close the connection and then refuse any future attempts to connect from my system for a period of time. This doesn't happen on my Windows box. My initial thoughts are that Konqueror is opening too many simultaneous connections and the FTP Site doesn't like it. Can anybody help me?http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28361You may need to use a dedicated ftp client for servers that limit connections. --gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list-- Ryan Holt[EMAIL PROTECTED] (240) 620-6585
[gentoo-user] Konqueror as an FTP Client
Hey, I'm trying to use Konqueror as an FTP client; problem is that it'll start uploading files but then my FTP server will close the connection and then refuse any future attempts to connect from my system for a period of time. This doesn't happen on my Windows box. My initial thoughts are that Konqueror is opening too many simultaneous connections and the FTP Site doesn't like it. Can anybody help me?-- Ryan Holt[EMAIL PROTECTED](240) 620-6585
Re: [gentoo-user] Konqueror as an FTP Client
I was having the problem with 3.4.3 and I just updated to 3.5.1 and still having it.On 2/15/06, Bryce Verdier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Are you using KDE 3.5.1, or 3.5?Cause i noticed a problem with 3.5.1, where i could no longer use thefish protocol to share large files, or else that connection would stall.bryceRyan Holt wrote: Hey, I'm trying to use Konqueror as an FTP client; problem is that it'll start uploading files but then my FTP server will close the connection and then refuse any future attempts to connect from my system for a period of time. This doesn't happen on my Windows box. My initial thoughts are that Konqueror is opening too many simultaneous connections and the FTP Site doesn't like it. Can anybody help me? -- Ryan Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (240) 620-6585--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- Ryan Holt[EMAIL PROTECTED](240) 620-6585
Re: [gentoo-user] is kde 3.5 stable enough?
If I were to setup a KDE 3.5 environment, what packages aside from kde-base should I setup with the ~amd64 exception in my /etc/portage/package.keywords ?On 2/14/06, Steven S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, b.n. wrote: Hi, I still can't see KDE 3.5 in the stable x86. Since I'd like to try it, but I also don't like to rely on unstable (i.e. crashing, misworking) apps very much, I have a couple of questions for you... 1)What is the timeline for having 3.5 stable? If I have to wait still 1 or 2 weeks, I don't mind, otherwise... 2)Does kde 3.5 pulls in a lot of ~x86 dependecies? 3)What are current known bugs/instabilities/issues/what of KDE 3.5 packages I should be aware of? I don't use KDE itself (I'm happy with Fluxbox) but I use KDE apps very much (Konqueror,Kwrite,Kate,K3b...). Thanks! m.I've been using a totally ~x86 for a long time and never had an issue. KDE 3.5 is working very well, I've not had a crash. I think the main thinggoing to be pulled in by anything is kdelibs, which you'd have to allow tobe ~x86. Just make sure you run emerge -pv packages and it will tell you exactly what it's going to need.--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
