[gentoo-user] Myspell and Linguas variable

2008-07-02 Thread Thomas Pedersen

Hey

Was just going to install my dictionaries for myspell, when I was 
wondering why myspell doesn't pull in the dictionaries depending on the 
languages in the LINGUAS variable in make.conf ??
- This method wouldn't require the user to be aware of the dictionaries 
when uninstalling myspell (or what ever might be depending on it)


Just a thought to make the world just a little bit easier

Thomas
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] HIJACKING THREADS

2008-06-12 Thread Thomas Pedersen

Stroller skrev:


On 12 Jun 2008, at 02:41, Chris Walters wrote:

...
Everyone makes mistakes, and it is can be good to point them out, 
though I do
think this thread is a bit of overkill - a private message to the 
person who

made the mistake is usually enough.


The problem with pointing it out privately is that that doesn't 
educate anyone else - thus it's more work to point it out privately to 
the next person, and the next, and one has to continue suffering 
hijacked threads in the meantime.


I think this thread appears overkill because I used ALL-CAPS in the 
subject, which has propagated to the replies. I won't do that again in 
the future, and apologise if this has led some of you to believe I was 
having a go at the original hjacker. I was perhaps terse in my 
request, but did not intend to be rude.


Stroller.

To be honest I never had a look at if I was the orignal hjacker or not 
... think I was, or at least have done it in the past
But anyways, never thought anyone has a go on me, just glad I know a bit 
more about how to compose new messages, to make everyone happy :-)


(Just to take this further; you good argue that the mail clients is 
using a wrong method of detecting these threads, cause it depends on the 
users' habits. I guess most of us choose the reply-button, cause it' 
easier than having to look-up the email address. But yeah things are 
like they are, and I'll use the compose button from now on, so everyone 
is happy :), hope others is following my lead...)


Thomas
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] HIJACKING THREADS

2008-06-11 Thread Thomas Pedersen

Two points:

1) Yeah you're right about not living in a glass house, and make a big 
deal out of nothing ;)


2) Thanks for letting us know about the differences about clicking reply 
and compose new ... I'm actually sure not all of us was aware about this 
difference


Just a comment...

Thomas
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] My Book® Home Edition™

2008-06-10 Thread Thomas Pedersen

Hey

Was thinking of buying the Western Digital' My Book® Home Edition™,
specially because of the eSATA connection...
I heard they have an internal USB-hub for making the capacity gauge working.

Anyone tried having one of those connected to a gentoo box, and does it 
work straight out of the box ?

-- I just want to be sure, before spending money on something useless

Thanks

Thomas
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Harddisk priority

2008-06-08 Thread Thomas Pedersen

Hey

I'm running a few processes in a cron-job, which makes the harddisk 
quiet busy, like the emerge --sync command.
I know it's possible to nice them to use less CPU power, but is there a 
similar approach for reading/writing to the disk?


Thanks
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Harddisk priority

2008-06-08 Thread Thomas Pedersen

Michal 'vorner' Vaner skrev:

Hello

On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:53:12AM +0200, Thomas Pedersen wrote:
  
I'm running a few processes in a cron-job, which makes the harddisk quiet 
busy, like the emerge --sync command.
I know it's possible to nice them to use less CPU power, but is there a 
similar approach for reading/writing to the disk?



I heard of tool called ionice, which does exactly this. AFAIK it needs a
kernel patch.

  

Knowing the name of what you're looking for sure helps...
ionice is already installed by the lastest util-linux
It seems to require the CFQ I/O scheduler, anyone know if it's a big 
disadvantage to run this scheduler instead of the Anticipatory ???
...and does anyone know if this works in a default stable Gentoo 
installation??

--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list