[gentoo-user] Re: Kernel Version

2005-11-01 Thread James
karlos k.gebbert at gmail.com writes:

 then change /etc/lilo.conf to the new(and only) kernel


Grub is a superior alternative to lilo.in my opinion.

I fought, scratch, pleaded, begged, and had massive lilo withdrawals,
until I spent some time with grub. Now you could not get me to use
lilo

I also experimennt with lots of kernel versions and modifications.
I routinely keep many kernels as boot options. Grub makes it all
easy.
YMMV,

Jamess




-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel Version

2005-11-01 Thread Dale
James wrote:


Grub is a superior alternative to lilo.in my opinion.

I fought, scratch, pleaded, begged, and had massive lilo withdrawals,
until I spent some time with grub. Now you could not get me to use
lilo

I also experimennt with lots of kernel versions and modifications.
I routinely keep many kernels as boot options. Grub makes it all
easy.
YMMV,

Jamess




  

I started on lilo to, then switched to grub.  You couldn't pay me to
switch back either.  I to keep a lot of kernels around just in case
something went belly up.  Being able to edit grub at the boot screen is
nice too.

If you can switch, it is well worth it.

Dale
:-)

-- 
To err is human, I'm most certainly human.

 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel Version

2005-11-01 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse

James wrote:


Grub is a superior alternative to lilo.in my opinion.
 

Superior ... definitely an opinion.  I also use Grub, but only because 
the interface is nicer and I don't have to load the boot sector every 
time I update the kernel.  However, there is a catch.  The computer will 
not boot if the /boot partition happens to get toasted. 


Tom Veldhouse
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list