Re: [gentoo-user] Big problem: Seamonkey
Alan Grimes wrote: > Hey, both Seamonkey 2.38 and 2.39 are unstable to the point of being > utterly unusable, I need to re-install 2.35 but it has already been > removed from Portage, HELP!! > > There are some mutterings on the upstream bugtracker about it being > related to how Cairo is being compiled/poorly coded, but urgently, I > need 2.35 back. Maybe I've been lucky, but I've had and have no problems with 2.38 nor 2.39 on ~x86 and I do use Seamonkey a lot. This does not help you but I wonder why. raffaele
[gentoo-user] Big problem: Seamonkey
Hey, both Seamonkey 2.38 and 2.39 are unstable to the point of being utterly unusable, I need to re-install 2.35 but it has already been removed from Portage, HELP!! There are some mutterings on the upstream bugtracker about it being related to how Cairo is being compiled/poorly coded, but urgently, I need 2.35 back. -- IQ is a measure of how stupid you feel. Powers are not rights.
Re: [gentoo-user] Big problem: Seamonkey
On Wednesday 18 Nov 2015 16:54:23 Alan Grimes wrote: > Hey, both Seamonkey 2.38 and 2.39 are unstable to the point of being > utterly unusable, I need to re-install 2.35 but it has already been > removed from Portage, HELP!! > > There are some mutterings on the upstream bugtracker about it being > related to how Cairo is being compiled/poorly coded, but urgently, I > need 2.35 back. http://gpo.zugaina.org/www-client/seamonkey There was also the CVS archive, but the link is dead. Probably all moved to git now? Someone else should be more knowledgeable on current portage architecture. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
