Re: [gentoo-user] How to correctly handle multiple Qt versions (qt4 X qt5)

2016-08-01 Thread Fernando Rodriguez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 08/01/2016 08:17 AM, Francisco Ares wrote:
> Hi all.
> 
> In thys Gento system, there are packages that still need Qt-4, while newest
> KDE, for instance, needs Qt-5.
> 
> Even inserting entries in "/etc/portage/package.use" for the packages that
> need qt4, the emerge still fails, arguing that the package needs Qt-4.
> 
> On this system, "qtchooser" has never worked propperly - as far as I could
> understand it - so I'm used to manage the "default.conf" symlink at
> "/etc/xdg/qtchooser/" - is it correct to do so?  If not, what should I do?
> 
> Thanks!
> Francisco
> 

Just resolve the conflicts and each program will use the right version. So post
the emerge output.

- -- 

Fernando Rodriguez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=zM8Z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



[gentoo-user] How to correctly handle multiple Qt versions (qt4 X qt5)

2016-08-01 Thread Francisco Ares
Hi all.

In thys Gento system, there are packages that still need Qt-4, while newest
KDE, for instance, needs Qt-5.

Even inserting entries in "/etc/portage/package.use" for the packages that
need qt4, the emerge still fails, arguing that the package needs Qt-4.

On this system, "qtchooser" has never worked propperly - as far as I could
understand it - so I'm used to manage the "default.conf" symlink at
"/etc/xdg/qtchooser/" - is it correct to do so?  If not, what should I do?

Thanks!
Francisco