Re: [gentoo-user] imagemagick display image edit tool draws an opaque background [RESOLVED]

2021-09-21 Thread n952162

On 8/30/20 10:02 PM, n952162 wrote:

In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
just the lines themselves.  I've never had this with display(1) before,
and can find nothing in the internet about it.  That suggests to me that
it's - again - a use-flag issue.  Is there some use flag I have to use
to have a colored line with a transparent background?



I finally figured this out.  In order to draw on images with display(1)
-> draw and have proper backgrounds, the /*-alpha on*/ option has to be
specified.




Re: [gentoo-user] imagemagick display image edit tool draws an opaque background [UPDATE]

2020-09-13 Thread n952162

Out of desperation, I've found out a workaround to this.  This
workaround suggests that it's a (introduced) bug in the program, because
I can't make out any logic to it.

im-display-eg-200913-1.png shows how the background is a not transparent
but a single color from the original background.  Note that the
"ellipse" tool was chosen, not the "fill-ellipse".

To get that image, I selected "image-edit -> draw... ->

  element -> ellipse

  color -> red

Normally, the color selects the color of the element.  This was new to
me that I got a white element when selecting red.  On other images, I
indeed get red.  But with the opaque "nonfill".  A "fill ellipse" would
have colored in the element with the selected color.

Anyway, im-display-eg-200913-2.png shows with I drew three ellipses,
changing only the color  The second ellipse, of a dark color, was indeed
transparent, showing the text underneath.  When I tried to change the
color to red again, I got the white square on the third ellipse.

I said this was a workaround, because by experimenting around, I could
get my red ellipse with transparent innerds and finish my project.  But
in preparing this report, I realized it's much more broken than I'd thought.


On 2020-08-30 22:02, n952162 wrote:

In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
just the lines themselves.  I've never had this with display(1) before,
and can find nothing in the internet about it.  That suggests to me that
it's - again - a use-flag issue.  Is there some use flag I have to use
to have a colored line with a transparent background?




Re: [gentoo-user] imagemagick display image edit tool draws an opaque background

2020-09-06 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 09:00:38AM +0200, n952162 wrote:
> On 2020-08-31 23:52, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:02:34PM +0200, n952162 wrote:
> > > In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
> > > image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
> > > just the lines themselves.  I've never had this with display(1) before,
> > First you use draw, which is used in convert, and then you speak of display.
>
> Please see the attached menu capture for "Image Edit ..."
> […]
> If you left-click on the window, you get a menu that allows the full
> range of editing capabilities.

Ah, I forgot about that (never used it), sorry.

> > Drawing is done on a canvas. So unless you start with an existing image file
> > as a basis, IM needs to pick a default background colour, which in your case
> > seems to be black.

>
> Yes, the problem is, I AM using an existing image.  Usually, with IM's
> display(1), I could add lines and text to images but now, all of a
> sudden, it uses a bounding box around the new strokes, choosing a single
> random color from the background.

Hm… When I select Edit → Annotate → Background, I can select transparent.
Unfortunately, I’m currently not on Gentoo and couldn’t find out on the spot
how to get the compile options for my Arch-based ImageMagick.

-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network.

“The mating dance is a courtship ritual. You do it to woo and win.
I wooed. I won. I’m done.” – Earl Sinclair (Dinosaurs Ep. 2)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] imagemagick display image edit tool draws an opaque background

2020-09-02 Thread n952162

On 2020-08-31 23:52, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:

On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:02:34PM +0200, n952162 wrote:

In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
just the lines themselves.  I've never had this with display(1) before,

First you use draw, which is used in convert, and then you speak of display.



Please see the attached menu capture for "Image Edit ..."




The latter is there to – well – display an image. My understanding of IM
mechanics is basic, but just this evening I was working on a small IM-based
script of my own.



If you left-click on the window, you get a menu that allows the full
range of editing capabilities.





Drawing is done on a canvas. So unless you start with an existing image file
as a basis, IM needs to pick a default background colour, which in your case
seems to be black.



Yes, the problem is, I AM using an existing image.  Usually, with IM's
display(1), I could add lines and text to images but now, all of a
sudden, it uses a bounding box around the new strokes, choosing a single
random color from the background.


There's lots of USE flags associated with Image Magick, most of which I
have no clue about.  Perhaps I need some transparency support or something.





and can find nothing in the internet about it.

Have you tried the IM website?
https://imagemagick.org/Usage/draw/
https://imagemagick.org/script/command-line-options.php#background



Re: [gentoo-user] imagemagick display image edit tool draws an opaque background

2020-08-31 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:02:34PM +0200, n952162 wrote:
> In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
> image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
> just the lines themselves.  I've never had this with display(1) before,

First you use draw, which is used in convert, and then you speak of display.
The latter is there to – well – display an image. My understanding of IM
mechanics is basic, but just this evening I was working on a small IM-based
script of my own.

Drawing is done on a canvas. So unless you start with an existing image file
as a basis, IM needs to pick a default background colour, which in your case
seems to be black.

> and can find nothing in the internet about it.

Have you tried the IM website?
https://imagemagick.org/Usage/draw/
https://imagemagick.org/script/command-line-options.php#background

-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network.

The quickest way to a man’s heart is through his sternum.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] imagemagick display image edit tool draws an opaque background

2020-08-30 Thread n952162

In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the
image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than
just the lines themselves.  I've never had this with display(1) before,
and can find nothing in the internet about it.  That suggests to me that
it's - again - a use-flag issue.  Is there some use flag I have to use
to have a colored line with a transparent background?




[gentoo-user] Imagemagick downgrade?

2019-11-10 Thread Mick
Having re-synced portage it now asks me to keyword media-gfx/
inkscape-1.0_beta1 and once I do, portage wants to downgrade media-gfx/
imagemagick from the installed 7.0.8.67 to 6.9.10.67.

I'm not sure why imagemagick is asking to be downgraded, or for that matter 
why inkscape should be keyworded:

snip...

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!

The following keyword changes are necessary to proceed:
 (see "package.accept_keywords" in the portage(5) man page for more details)
# required by @selected
# required by @world (argument)
=media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta1 ~amd64

Would you like to add these changes to your config files? [Yes/No] no

 * In order to avoid wasting time, backtracking has terminated early
 * due to the above autounmask change(s). The --autounmask-backtrack=y
 * option can be used to force further backtracking, but there is no
 * guarantee that it will produce a solution.

!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "https://www.imagemagick.org/
 Description: A collection of tools and libraries for many image 
formats

$ eix -l inkscape
[U] media-gfx/inkscape
 Available versions:  
0.92.4^t[cdr dbus dia exif gnome imagemagick inkjar 
jpeg latex lcms nls openmp postscript spell static-libs visio wpg 
PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7"] ["python_targets_python2_7"]
   (~)  1.0_beta1 ^t[cdr dbus dia exif gnome graphicsmagick 
imagemagick inkjar jemalloc jpeg lcms nls openmp postscript spell static-libs 
svg2 visio wpg PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_5 python3_6 python3_7" 
PYTHON_TARGETS="python3_5 python3_6 python3_7"] ["^^ ( 
python_single_target_python3_5 python_single_target_python3_6 
python_single_target_python3_7 ) python_single_target_python3_5? ( 
python_targets_python3_5 ) python_single_target_python3_6? ( 
python_targets_python3_6 ) python_single_target_python3_7? ( 
python_targets_python3_7 )"]
 Installed versions:  0.92.4^t(10:16:19 14/10/19)(cdr dbus exif 
imagemagick jpeg lcms nls openmp postscript spell -dia -gnome -inkjar -latex -
static-libs -visio -wpg PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7")
 Homepage:https://inkscape.org/
 Description: SVG based generic vector-drawing program


Am I misreading portage's output above?
-- 
Regards,

Mick

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick not being detected by emacs

2019-07-23 Thread James Stevenson
Thank you for the solution, will give it a try this evening!

James

On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, 00:06 David Haller,  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, James Stevenson wrote:
> >I'm struggling to get emacs to incorporate imagemagick to allow for
> >rudimental image viewing and manipulation functionality. I have both
> >media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.8-50 and app-editors/emacs-26.2 installed.
>
> Save the attached patch I found upstream as this commit[1] for emacs-27
>
> /etc/portage/patches/app-editors/emacs-26.2/ImageMagick-7.patch
>
> and change the emacs-26.2.ebuild (or better a copy in your local
> overlay) so that
>
> AT_M4DIR=m4 eautoreconf
>
> is run at the end of src_prepare() which is already there but
> commented out.
>
> HTH,
> -dnh
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/commit/5729486951e6a60db55ea17ee3bac9baf8b54f6a
>
>
> --
> Ok, I'm just uploading the new version of the kernel, v1.3.33, also
> known as "the buggiest kernel ever".  -- Linus Torvalds


Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick not being detected by emacs

2019-07-22 Thread David Haller
Hello,

On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, James Stevenson wrote:
>I'm struggling to get emacs to incorporate imagemagick to allow for
>rudimental image viewing and manipulation functionality. I have both
>media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.8-50 and app-editors/emacs-26.2 installed.

Save the attached patch I found upstream as this commit[1] for emacs-27

/etc/portage/patches/app-editors/emacs-26.2/ImageMagick-7.patch

and change the emacs-26.2.ebuild (or better a copy in your local
overlay) so that

AT_M4DIR=m4 eautoreconf

is run at the end of src_prepare() which is already there but
commented out.

HTH,
-dnh

[1] 
https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/commit/5729486951e6a60db55ea17ee3bac9baf8b54f6a


-- 
Ok, I'm just uploading the new version of the kernel, v1.3.33, also
known as "the buggiest kernel ever".  -- Linus Torvalds:100644 100644 e5d094cf9e f9bbccda0c M	configure.ac
:100644 100644 b9ff3f25c4 7e518ce34f M	src/image.c

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index e5d094cf9e..f9bbccda0c 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -2518,9 +2518,16 @@ if test "${HAVE_X11}" = "yes" || test "${HAVE_NS}" = "yes" || test "${HAVE_W32}"
 
 ## 6.3.5 is the earliest version known to work; see Bug#17339.
 ## 6.8.2 makes Emacs crash; see Bug#13867.
-## 7 and later have not been ported to; See Bug#25967.
-IMAGEMAGICK_MODULE="Wand >= 6.3.5 Wand != 6.8.2 Wand < 7"
-EMACS_CHECK_MODULES([IMAGEMAGICK], [$IMAGEMAGICK_MODULE])
+IMAGEMAGICK7_MODULE="MagickWand >= 7"
+IMAGEMAGICK6_MODULE="Wand >= 6.3.5 Wand != 6.8.2"
+# As we check for ImageMagick 7 then 6 track which version we find
+EMACS_CHECK_MODULES([IMAGEMAGICK], [$IMAGEMAGICK7_MODULE])
+AS_IF([test $HAVE_IMAGEMAGICK = yes],
+  [IMAGEMAGICK_MAJOR=7],
+  [
+EMACS_CHECK_MODULES([IMAGEMAGICK], [$IMAGEMAGICK6_MODULE])
+AS_IF([test $HAVE_IMAGEMAGICK = yes], [IMAGEMAGICK_MAJOR=6])
+  ])
 
 if test $HAVE_IMAGEMAGICK = yes; then
   OLD_CFLAGS=$CFLAGS
@@ -2540,6 +2547,8 @@ if test "${HAVE_X11}" = "yes" || test "${HAVE_NS}" = "yes" || test "${HAVE_W32}"
 fi
 if test $HAVE_IMAGEMAGICK = yes; then
   AC_DEFINE([HAVE_IMAGEMAGICK], 1, [Define to 1 if using ImageMagick.])
+  AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([IMAGEMAGICK_MAJOR], [$IMAGEMAGICK_MAJOR],
+ [ImageMagick major version number (from configure).])
 else
   IMAGEMAGICK_CFLAGS=
   IMAGEMAGICK_LIBS=
@@ -5460,7 +5469,7 @@ AS_ECHO(["  Does Emacs use -lXaw3d? ${HAVE_XAW3D
   Does Emacs use -lrsvg-2?${HAVE_RSVG}
   Does Emacs use cairo?   ${HAVE_CAIRO}
   Does Emacs use -llcms2? ${HAVE_LCMS2}
-  Does Emacs use imagemagick (version 6)? ${HAVE_IMAGEMAGICK}
+  Does Emacs use imagemagick? ${HAVE_IMAGEMAGICK}
   Does Emacs support sound?   ${HAVE_SOUND}
   Does Emacs use -lgpm?   ${HAVE_GPM}
   Does Emacs use -ldbus?  ${HAVE_DBUS}
diff --git a/src/image.c b/src/image.c
index b9ff3f25c4..7e518ce34f 100644
--- a/src/image.c
+++ b/src/image.c
@@ -8273,11 +8273,20 @@ imagemagick_image_p (Lisp_Object object)
 /* The GIF library also defines DrawRectangle, but its never used in Emacs.
Therefore rename the function so it doesn't collide with ImageMagick.  */
 #define DrawRectangle DrawRectangleGif
-#include 
+
+#if IMAGEMAGICK_MAJOR == 6
+# include 
+# include 
+#else
+# include 
+# include 
+/* ImageMagick 7 compatibility definitions */
+# define PixelSetMagickColor PixelSetPixelColor
+typedef PixelInfo MagickPixelPacket;
+#endif
 
 /* ImageMagick 6.5.3 through 6.6.5 hid PixelGetMagickColor for some reason.
Emacs seems to work fine with the hidden version, so unhide it.  */
-#include 
 #if 0x653 <= MagickLibVersion && MagickLibVersion <= 0x665
 extern WandExport void PixelGetMagickColor (const PixelWand *,
 	MagickPixelPacket *);
@@ -8815,7 +8824,7 @@ imagemagick_load_image (struct frame *f, struct image *img,
 #endif /* HAVE_MAGICKEXPORTIMAGEPIXELS */
 {
   size_t image_height;
-  MagickRealType color_scale = 65535.0 / QuantumRange;
+  MagickRealType color_scale = 65535.0 / (MagickRealType) QuantumRange;
 #ifdef USE_CAIRO
   data = xmalloc (width * height * 4);
   color_scale /= 256;


[gentoo-user] Imagemagick not being detected by emacs

2019-07-21 Thread James Stevenson
Hello all, 

I'm struggling to get emacs to incorporate imagemagick to allow for
rudimental image viewing and manipulation functionality. I have both
media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.8-50 and app-editors/emacs-26.2 installed.
With imagemagick installed prior to an emacs rebuild the compiler output
says something to the effect of 'Imagemagick detected... no' despite the
`imagemagick` USE flag being enabled. Similarly, when I run
eval-expression in emacs for (image-type-available-p 'imagemagick), a
value of nil is returned meaning that emacs is still unaware of
imagemagick. 
I think I can probably add imagemagick to the environment path but I am
unsure which directory to add. Most of the binaries live in /usr/bin
which is already on the PATH by default. Would appreciate any
suggestions the mailing list could offer.

All the best,
James



Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick-7 security

2018-08-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 09:28:03 BST Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote:
> August 23, 2018 10:12 AM, "Peter Humphrey"  wrote:
> > That prompted me to emerge -K imagemagick, and I saw the same. But just
> > before the line " * For security reasons..." was this:
> > 
> > /var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.8.10-r1/temp/environment:
> > line 2260: version_is_at_least: command not found
> 
> That's from versionator.eclass which is ditched in favor of
> eapi7-er.eclass or directly integrated in portage from eapi 7.
> 
> The ebuild has been ported to eapi7-ver without updating all previous
> calls to functions from eapi7-er.
> 
> This is a bug that should be reported.

Done:   https://bugs.gentoo.org/664348 .

-- 
Regards,
Peter.






Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick-7 security

2018-08-23 Thread Corentin “Nado” Pazdera
August 23, 2018 10:28 AM, "Corentin “Nado” Pazdera"  wrote:

> August 23, 2018 10:12 AM, "Peter Humphrey"  wrote:
> 
>> That prompted me to emerge -K imagemagick, and I saw the same. But just
>> before the line " * For security reasons..." was this:
>> 
>> /var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.8.10-r1/temp/environment: line
>> 2260: version_is_at_least: command not found
> 
> That's from versionator.eclass which is ditched in favor of eapi7-er.eclass 
> or directly integrated
> in portage from eapi 7.
> 
> The ebuild has been ported to eapi7-ver without updating all previous calls 
> to functions from
> eapi7-er.
from versionator*
> 
> This is a bug that should be reported.

Also, link to the commit :
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/diff/media-gfx/imagemagick/imagemagick-7.0.8.10-r1.ebuild?id=02765dfc333e578af9e3fd525fc0067dc47d6528


Corentin “Nado” Pazdera



Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick-7 security

2018-08-23 Thread Corentin “Nado” Pazdera
August 23, 2018 10:12 AM, "Peter Humphrey"  wrote:

> That prompted me to emerge -K imagemagick, and I saw the same. But just
> before the line " * For security reasons..." was this:
> 
> /var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.8.10-r1/temp/environment: line
> 2260: version_is_at_least: command not found

That's from versionator.eclass which is ditched in favor of eapi7-er.eclass or 
directly integrated
in portage from eapi 7.

The ebuild has been ported to eapi7-ver without updating all previous calls to 
functions from
eapi7-er.

This is a bug that should be reported.

Regards,
Corentin “Nado” Pazdera



Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick-7 security

2018-08-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 09:06:12 BST Mick wrote:
> I noticed this enotice in imagemagick:
> 
>  * For security reasons, a policy.xml file was installed in
> /etc/ImageMagick-7 * which will prevent the usage of the following coders
> by default: *
>  *   - PS
>  *   - EPS
>  *   - PDF
>  *   - XPS
> 
> Excuse my ignorance, but I am not sure why the above PS related files are
> disabled.  What is the security threat exactly?  JavaScript contents which
> may be executed by ImageMagick?

That prompted me to emerge -K imagemagick, and I saw the same. But just 
before the line " * For security reasons..." was this:

/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.8.10-r1/temp/environment: line 
2260: version_is_at_least: command not found

So that's two mysteries.

-- 
Regards,
Peter.






[gentoo-user] ImageMagick-7 security

2018-08-23 Thread Mick
I noticed this enotice in imagemagick:

 * For security reasons, a policy.xml file was installed in /etc/ImageMagick-7
 * which will prevent the usage of the following coders by default:
 *   
 *   - PS
 *   - EPS   
 *   - PDF   
 *   - XPS   

Excuse my ignorance, but I am not sure why the above PS related files are 
disabled.  What is the security threat exactly?  JavaScript contents which may 
be executed by ImageMagick?

-- 
Regards,
Mick

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] imagemagick / graphicsmagick collision

2016-06-12 Thread Alan McKinnon

On 12/06/2016 12:50, Heiko Baums wrote:

Am 12.06.2016 um 12:05 schrieb Alan McKinnon:

My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now.
ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it (other
than masking graphics magick):

[blocks B  ] media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]
("media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]" is blocking
media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.7)
[blocks B  ] media-gfx/imagemagick ("media-gfx/imagemagick" is
blocking media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.3.24)



So here's the question: Why is portage not realising I already have a
suitable *magick and decides I ought to have the blocker?


Install graphicsmagick with USE="-imagemagick".

If I recall correctly the blocker is because of a file or a feature
collision of media-gfx/imagemagick and
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick].




I could do that, but I don't see any compelling reason to have 
graphicsmagick at all and I can't figure why portage doesn't accept 
installed imagemagick as fulfilling the DEPEND


As per my other reply to Neil, --changed-deps=n makes a difference

emerge --changed-deps=y finds graphicsmagick and wants to use it
emerge --changed-deps=n finds imagemagick and uses that.

Maybe if I set --backtrack= portage will find a 
resolution.


Alan



Re: [gentoo-user] imagemagick / graphicsmagick collision

2016-06-12 Thread Alan McKinnon

On 12/06/2016 12:13, Neil Bothwick wrote:

On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:05:47 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:


My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now.
ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it
(other than masking graphics magick):

[blocks B  ] media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]
("media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]" is blocking
media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.7)
[blocks B  ] media-gfx/imagemagick ("media-gfx/imagemagick" is
blocking media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.3.24)



graphicsmagick is not installed.


Everything pulling in graphicsmagick is already satisfied by
imagemagick[png]:



So here's the question: Why is portage not realising I already have a
suitable *magick and decides I ought to have the blocker?


You've probably already tried these but

does adding --tree give anything more useful?


Not really. The depgraph in the error output covers it all


Does grep magick -r /etc/portage show anything?



No,

# grep -r magick /etc/portage/
/etc/portage/make.conf: -icq icu id3tag ieee1394 imagemagick imap 
innodb introspection \

/etc/portage/package.use/package.use:media-gfx/imagemagick fpx hdri q32 q8
/etc/portage/package.use/libperl:media-gfx/imagemagick -perl



I *did* have --changed-deps=y in my emerge world command, taking it out 
works and portage does what I expect. I read the man page entry for it, but


a) it doesn't make much sense
b) I can't see how that would make a difference







Re: [gentoo-user] imagemagick / graphicsmagick collision

2016-06-12 Thread Heiko Baums
Am 12.06.2016 um 12:05 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now.
> ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it (other
> than masking graphics magick):
> 
> [blocks B  ] media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]
> ("media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]" is blocking
> media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.7)
> [blocks B  ] media-gfx/imagemagick ("media-gfx/imagemagick" is
> blocking media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.3.24)

> So here's the question: Why is portage not realising I already have a
> suitable *magick and decides I ought to have the blocker?

Install graphicsmagick with USE="-imagemagick".

If I recall correctly the blocker is because of a file or a feature
collision of media-gfx/imagemagick and
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick].



Re: [gentoo-user] imagemagick / graphicsmagick collision

2016-06-12 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:05:47 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:

> My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now. 
> ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it
> (other than masking graphics magick):
> 
> [blocks B  ] media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick] 
> ("media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]" is blocking 
> media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.7)
> [blocks B  ] media-gfx/imagemagick ("media-gfx/imagemagick" is 
> blocking media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.3.24)

> graphicsmagick is not installed.
> 
> 
> Everything pulling in graphicsmagick is already satisfied by 
> imagemagick[png]:

> So here's the question: Why is portage not realising I already have a 
> suitable *magick and decides I ought to have the blocker?

You've probably already tried these but

does adding --tree give anything more useful?

Does grep magick -r /etc/portage show anything?


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Did you hear about the dyslexic devil worshiper?
He sold his soul to Santa!


pgpTFGe2O_oz6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[gentoo-user] imagemagick / graphicsmagick collision

2016-06-12 Thread Alan McKinnon

Hi all,

My main desktop has been giving me these stupid error for a week now. 
ANd I can't figure out what portage wants to do or how to stop it (other 
than masking graphics magick):


[blocks B  ] media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick] 
("media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick]" is blocking 
media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.7)
[blocks B  ] media-gfx/imagemagick ("media-gfx/imagemagick" is 
blocking media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.3.24)



media-gfx/imagemagick:0

  (media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.7:0/6.9.4.7::gentoo, ebuild scheduled 
for merge) pulled in by

(no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)

  (media-gfx/imagemagick-6.9.4.6:0/6.9.4.6::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>=media-gfx/imagemagick-5.5.7.14:0/6.9.4.6= required by 
(media-video/dvdauthor-0.7.1:0/0::gentoo, installed)
^^^ 



(and 1 more with the same problem)

 * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
 * installed at the same time on the same system.

  (media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.3.24:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for 
merge) pulled in by
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick,png] required by 
(x11-themes/tango-icon-theme-extras-0.1.0-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed)
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick] required by 
(media-plugins/kipi-plugins-4.14.0:4/4::gentoo, installed)
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick,png] required by 
(x11-themes/tango-icon-theme-0.8.90:0/0::gentoo, installed)



imagemagick is installed:
khamul ~ # eix imagemagick
[U] media-gfx/imagemagick
 Available versions:  6.9.0.3(0/6.9.0.3)^u (~)6.9.1.8(0/6.9.1.8)^u 
(~)6.9.2.10(0/6.9.2.10)^u (~)6.9.3.10(0/6.9.3.10)^u 6.9.4.1(0/6.9.4.1)^u 
(~)6.9.4.5(0/6.9.4.5)^u 6.9.4.6(0/6.9.4.6)^u (~)6.9.4.7(0/6.9.4.7)^u 
[M](~)7.0.1.9(0/7.0.1.9)^u {X autotrace bzip2 corefonts cxx djvu fftw 
fontconfig fpx graphviz hdri jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lqr lzma opencl 
openexr openmp pango perl png postscript q32 q64 q8 raw static-libs svg 
test tiff truetype webp wmf xml zlib}
 Installed versions:  6.9.4.6(11:31:21 04/06/2016)(X bzip2 cxx djvu 
fontconfig fpx graphviz hdri jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lzma openexr openmp 
pango png postscript q32 q8 raw svg tiff truetype webp wmf xml zlib 
-autotrace -corefonts -fftw -lqr -opencl -perl -q64 -static-libs -test)



graphicsmagick is not installed.


Everything pulling in graphicsmagick is already satisfied by 
imagemagick[png]:


tango-icon-theme-extras-0.1.0-r1.ebuild:
|| ( media-gfx/imagemagick[png?] 
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick,png?] )


kipi-plugins-4.14.0:
videoslideshow? (
|| ( media-gfx/imagemagick 
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick] )
imagemagick? ( || ( media-gfx/imagemagick 
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick] ) )


tango-icon-theme-0.8.90.ebuild
|| ( media-gfx/imagemagick[png?] 
media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagemagick,png?] )




So here's the question: Why is portage not realising I already have a 
suitable *magick and decides I ought to have the blocker?


Alan



Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick and Graphicsmagick blocking each other

2011-12-11 Thread Willie WY Wong
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 03:37:02AM +0100, Penguin Lover Frank Steinmetzger 
squawked:
 On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:59:27AM +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
  Frank Steinmetzger writes:
  
  It seems you can install graphicsmagick along with imagemagick, if the
  imagemagick USE flag ist not set.
 
 That’s what came to my mind also while I was reading Francisco’s first answer.
 Rebuilding without the flag now. Thanks you two.

It may not be immediately obvious from the description of the USE
flag, since graphicsmagick choose not to add a local use flag
description that better describes its use, but if you read the ebuild,
you'll find that rather than enabling support for imagemagick, the
flag imagemagick in this case means enable imagemagick
compatibility, which I assume means that it will install the usual
set of tools (convert, identify, etc.) that imagemagick installs. 

Obviously this will cause a file collision if you also have
imagemagick installed. 

Cheers, 

W

-- 
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire 
 et vice versa   ~~~  I. Newton




[gentoo-user] Imagemagick and Graphicsmagick blocking each other

2011-12-10 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Hello,

a number of packages depend on imagemagick, such as Inkscape, Frescobaldi and
some LaTeX related stuff. I wanted to take a look at Octave, but this
positively wants graphicsmagick, which is a fork of imagemagick as far as I can
tell and which conflicts with imagemagick.

Now some of the named packages can use graphicsmagick, it just comes last in
the ebuild’s order of dependencies, but some others can’t. D’ya think this is
worthy of a bug report, since graphicsmagick even has an imagemagick useflag?
Perhaps this could be converted into a virtual to make this easier on a global
scale.

Or would it be too much dependent upon the individual package? I don’t know
anything about graphicsmagick really, or its kind of compatibility
implementation.

Cheers
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.

“We all know Linux is great … it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.”
  – Linus Torvalds


pgpHBd1RWp6zC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick and Graphicsmagick blocking each other

2011-12-10 Thread Francisco Ares
Hi

Not sure how, but I have both installed.  I recall having some
dificulties... Let me look for them

Francisco

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:

 Hello,

 a number of packages depend on imagemagick, such as Inkscape, Frescobaldi
 and
 some LaTeX related stuff. I wanted to take a look at Octave, but this
 positively wants graphicsmagick, which is a fork of imagemagick as far as
 I can
 tell and which conflicts with imagemagick.

 Now some of the named packages can use graphicsmagick, it just comes last
 in
 the ebuild’s order of dependencies, but some others can’t. D’ya think this
 is
 worthy of a bug report, since graphicsmagick even has an imagemagick
 useflag?
 Perhaps this could be converted into a virtual to make this easier on a
 global
 scale.

 Or would it be too much dependent upon the individual package? I don’t know
 anything about graphicsmagick really, or its kind of compatibility
 implementation.

 Cheers
 --
 Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
 I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.

 “We all know Linux is great … it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.”
  – Linus Torvalds



Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick and Graphicsmagick blocking each other

2011-12-10 Thread Francisco Ares
Hi again

Theese are my USE flags for both, probably the key is one of them, like,
perhaps, having graphicsmagick independent of imagemagick:


# emerge -pvD graphicsmagick imagemagick

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild   R] media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.3.12-r1  USE=X bzip2 cxx jbig
jpeg jpeg2k lcms modules openmp png svg threads tiff truetype wmf zlib
-debug -doc -fpx -imagemagick -perl -q16 -q32 0
kB

[ebuild   R] media-gfx/imagemagick-6.7.1.0  USE=X bzip2 corefonts cxx
djvu fftw fontconfig fpx graphviz gs hdri jbig jpeg jpeg2k lcms lzma opencl
openmp png svg tiff truetype wmf xml zlib -autotrace -lqr -openexr -perl
-q32 -q64 -q8 -raw -static-libs -webp 0
kB


Total: 2 packages (2 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 0 kB


Hope it helps
Francisco

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Francisco Ares fra...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi

 Not sure how, but I have both installed.  I recall having some
 dificulties... Let me look for them

 Francisco


 On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:

 Hello,

 a number of packages depend on imagemagick, such as Inkscape, Frescobaldi
 and
 some LaTeX related stuff. I wanted to take a look at Octave, but this
 positively wants graphicsmagick, which is a fork of imagemagick as far as
 I can
 tell and which conflicts with imagemagick.

 Now some of the named packages can use graphicsmagick, it just comes last
 in
 the ebuild’s order of dependencies, but some others can’t. D’ya think
 this is
 worthy of a bug report, since graphicsmagick even has an imagemagick
 useflag?
 Perhaps this could be converted into a virtual to make this easier on a
 global
 scale.

 Or would it be too much dependent upon the individual package? I don’t
 know
 anything about graphicsmagick really, or its kind of compatibility
 implementation.

 Cheers
 --
 Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
 I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.

 “We all know Linux is great … it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.”
  – Linus Torvalds





Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick and Graphicsmagick blocking each other

2011-12-10 Thread Alex Schuster
Frank Steinmetzger writes:

 a number of packages depend on imagemagick, such as Inkscape,
 Frescobaldi and some LaTeX related stuff. I wanted to take a look at
 Octave, but this positively wants graphicsmagick, which is a fork of
 imagemagick as far as I can tell and which conflicts with imagemagick.

It seems you can install graphicsmagick along with imagemagick, if the
imagemagick USE flag ist not set.

Wonko



Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick and Graphicsmagick blocking each other

2011-12-10 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:59:27AM +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
 Frank Steinmetzger writes:
 
 It seems you can install graphicsmagick along with imagemagick, if the
 imagemagick USE flag ist not set.

That’s what came to my mind also while I was reading Francisco’s first answer.
Rebuilding without the flag now. Thanks you two.
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.

Progress means that we know ever more but gain ever less from it.


pgp1M9ek9nBt8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-28 Thread Philip Webb
28 Róbert Čerňanský wrote:
 Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
 I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert
 from one format to another (jpg to png, for example),
 but I'm darned if I can find an executable to run the program.
 There used to be one in /usr/bin on my old system.
 There was also another GUI with commands like on this screenshot:
 http://tuxradar.com/files/imagemagick-1.png
 but I do not remember how to launch it.

That's 'display'.  Use left-mouse to display the menu.

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca




Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-28 Thread Albert W. Hopkins
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 17:04 -0500, Colleen Beamer wrote:
[..]
  yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert
 
 This isn't quite what I wanted - you have to add options to the
 command.  I was hoping to get the graphical interface that I had
 before.  Please don't tell me they took a great little program and
 screwed it up!  :-)
 
 Colleen
 
AFAIK ImageMagick has *always* been a suite of commands, and an optional
GUI client. I have been used ImageMagick as far back as the early 90s
and it's always been that way... perhaps we were using different
ImageMagicks?






[gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-27 Thread Colleen Beamer
Hi all,

I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from one
format to another (jpg to png, for example).  ImageMagick is installed
on my system (installed as requirement of something else), but I'm
darned if I can find an executable to run the program.  There used to be
one in /usr/bin on my old system.

Does anyone have any experience with this?

Regards,

Colleen

-- 

Registered Linux User #411143 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org




Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-27 Thread Michael Mol
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Colleen Beamer
colleen.bea...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from one
 format to another (jpg to png, for example).  ImageMagick is installed
 on my system (installed as requirement of something else), but I'm
 darned if I can find an executable to run the program.  There used to be
 one in /usr/bin on my old system.

 Does anyone have any experience with this?

equery f imagemagick|grep bin

?


-- 
:wq



Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-27 Thread Michael Schreckenbauer
Hi Colleen,

Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
 Hi all,
 
 I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from one
 format to another (jpg to png, for example).  ImageMagick is installed
 on my system (installed as requirement of something else), but I'm
 darned if I can find an executable to run the program.  There used to be
 one in /usr/bin on my old system.
 Does anyone have any experience with this?

yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert

 Regards,
 Colleen

Best,
Michael




Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-27 Thread Colleen Beamer
On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
 Hi Colleen,

 Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
 Hi all,

 I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from one
 format to another (jpg to png, for example). ImageMagick is installed
 on my system (installed as requirement of something else), but I'm
 darned if I can find an executable to run the program. There used to be
 one in /usr/bin on my old system.
 Does anyone have any experience with this?

 yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert

This isn't quite what I wanted - you have to add options to the
command.  I was hoping to get the graphical interface that I had
before.  Please don't tell me they took a great little program and
screwed it up!  :-)

Colleen

-- 

Registered Linux User #411143 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org



Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-27 Thread Michael Schreckenbauer
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
 On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
  Hi Colleen,
  
  Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
  Hi all,
  
  I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from
  one
  format to another (jpg to png, for example). ImageMagick is installed
  on my system (installed as requirement of something else), but I'm
  darned if I can find an executable to run the program. There used to
  be
  one in /usr/bin on my old system.
  Does anyone have any experience with this?
  
  yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert
 
 This isn't quite what I wanted - you have to add options to the
 command.  I was hoping to get the graphical interface that I had
 before.  Please don't tell me they took a great little program and
 screwed it up!  :-)

ImageMagick has no gui-frontend and it never had. It's a library for image 
manipulation and a collection of CLI-programs for the same task.
I have no idea what you used before, but it wasn't part of ImageMagick.

 Colleen

Best,
Michael




Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-27 Thread Michael Mol
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Colleen Beamer
colleen.bea...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
 Hi Colleen,
 Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
 Does anyone have any experience with this?

 yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert

 This isn't quite what I wanted - you have to add options to the command.  I
 was hoping to get the graphical interface that I had before.  Please don't
 tell me they took a great little program and screwed it up!  :-)

A GUI interface specifically for imagemagick is news to me;
imagemagick has always been a cli program. I don't see any reference
to a GUI among its USE flags, either. Perhaps you were using some
other program which acted as a front-end? Have you done a --depclean
which may have removed that?

Incidentally, if you want to retain a package, you really should
select it for your @world set; otherwise, a depclean could pull it out
from under you.

-- 
:wq



Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-27 Thread Michael Schreckenbauer
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
 On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
  Hi Colleen,
  
  Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
  Hi all,
  
  I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from
  one
  format to another (jpg to png, for example). ImageMagick is installed
  on my system (installed as requirement of something else), but I'm
  darned if I can find an executable to run the program. There used to
  be
  one in /usr/bin on my old system.
  Does anyone have any experience with this?
  
  yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert
 
 This isn't quite what I wanted - you have to add options to the
 command.  I was hoping to get the graphical interface that I had
 before.  Please don't tell me they took a great little program and
 screwed it up!  :-)

is /usr/bin/display the program you were looking for?
It supports a subset of ImageMagick's functionality.

 Colleen

Best,
Michael





Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-27 Thread Colleen Beamer
On 11/27/11 16:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
 Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
 On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
 Hi Colleen,

 Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
 Hi all,

 I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from
 one
 format to another (jpg to png, for example). ImageMagick is installed
 on my system (installed as requirement of something else), but I'm
 darned if I can find an executable to run the program. There used to
 be
 one in /usr/bin on my old system.
 Does anyone have any experience with this?

 yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert

 This isn't quite what I wanted - you have to add options to the
 command. I was hoping to get the graphical interface that I had
 before. Please don't tell me they took a great little program and
 screwed it up! :-)

 ImageMagick has no gui-frontend and it never had. It's a library for image
 manipulation and a collection of CLI-programs for the same task.
 I have no idea what you used before, but it wasn't part of ImageMagick.

Oh, yes, it was!  :-)  There used to be a command in /usr/bin named
imagemagick and if you launched it, it brought up an interface with
menus/buttons that you could click on.  Granted, I haven't used it in
quite a while.  However, I used to use it all the time to scale graphics
when I was writing the handbook for krecipes and convert images from
jpeg to png.

Regards,

Colleen


-- 

Registered Linux User #411143 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org



Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-27 Thread Colleen Beamer
On 11/27/11 16:22, Michael Mol wrote:
 On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Colleen Beamer
 colleen.bea...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
 Hi Colleen,
 Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
 Does anyone have any experience with this?

 yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert

 This isn't quite what I wanted - you have to add options to the command. I
 was hoping to get the graphical interface that I had before. Please don't
 tell me they took a great little program and screwed it up! :-)

 A GUI interface specifically for imagemagick is news to me;
 imagemagick has always been a cli program. I don't see any reference
 to a GUI among its USE flags, either. Perhaps you were using some
 other program which acted as a front-end? Have you done a --depclean
 which may have removed that?

 Incidentally, if you want to retain a package, you really should
 select it for your @world set; otherwise, a depclean could pull it out
 from under you.

Haven't done a depclean.  This is a reasonable new computer.  Haven't
used ImageMagick in quite a while (way before I got this new computer)
and granted, it wasn't a gui that automatically got added to your kmenu,
but I created an icon for and for the command, I used
/usr/bin/imagemagick.  I recall at one point that if I used the command
imagemagick, it would launch some other interface (can't remember which
one) and I had to create a symlink named magick which linked to
/usr/bin/imagemagick.  I have tons of graphics that I resized and
converted to png from jpegs, but unfortunately, the don't say that I
used imagemagick to alter them.

-- 

Registered Linux User #411143 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org



Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-27 Thread Colleen Beamer
On 11/27/11 16:28, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
 Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
 On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
 Hi Colleen,

 Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
 Hi all,

 I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from
 one
 format to another (jpg to png, for example). ImageMagick is installed
 on my system (installed as requirement of something else), but I'm
 darned if I can find an executable to run the program. There used to
 be
 one in /usr/bin on my old system.
 Does anyone have any experience with this?
 yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert
 This isn't quite what I wanted - you have to add options to the
 command.  I was hoping to get the graphical interface that I had
 before.  Please don't tell me they took a great little program and
 screwed it up!  :-)
 is /usr/bin/display the program you were looking for?
 It supports a subset of ImageMagick's functionality.

Thank you!!!  This is EXACTLY it.  :-)  Like I said, haven't used this
in a while and had forgotten about this!


Regards,

Colleen

-- 

Registered Linux User #411143 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org




Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-27 Thread Dale

Colleen Beamer wrote:



Oh, yes, it was!  :-)  There used to be a command in /usr/bin named 
imagemagick and if you launched it, it brought up an interface with 
menus/buttons that you could click on.  Granted, I haven't used it in 
quite a while.  However, I used to use it all the time to scale 
graphics when I was writing the handbook for krecipes and convert 
images from jpeg to png.


Regards,

Colleen




I searched for that command, I can't find it or any reference to it 
having any GUI at all.  According to the wiki:


The software mainly consists of a number of command-line interface 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command-line_interface utilities for 
manipulating images. ImageMagick does *not* have a GUI 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphical_user_interface-based interface 
to edit images, as do Adobe Photoshop 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Photoshop and GIMP 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIMP, but instead modifies existing 
images as directed by various command-line parameters. 


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ImageMagick

I also can't find anything on their website about a GUI either.  There 
are front ends to it tho.  This from the imagemagick website:


The functionality of ImageMagick is typically utilized from the command 
line or you can use the features from programs written in your favorite 
language. Choose from these interfaces: G2F 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#ada (Ada), MagickCore 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#c (C), MagickWand 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#c (C), ChMagick 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#ch (Ch), ImageMagickObject 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#com_ (COM+), Magick++ 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#c__ (C++), JMagick 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#java (Java), L-Magick 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#lisp (Lisp), NMagick 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#neko (Neko/haXe), MagickNet 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#dot-net (.NET), PascalMagick 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#pascal (Pascal), PerlMagick 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#perl (Perl), MagickWand for 
PHP http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#php (PHP), IMagick 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#php (PHP), PythonMagick 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#python (Python), RMagick 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#ruby (Ruby), or TclMagick 
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/api.php#tcl (Tcl/TK). With a 
language interface, use ImageMagick to modify or create images 
dynamically and /automagically/.


I'm not sure if any of those are GUI tho.

Maybe whatever distro you were using sort of played a name game with the 
command?  The command was named imagemagick but was actually pointing to 
something else that had a GUI and was a front end for it.


Krecipe huh?  Installing it now.  I like to cook and eat.  lol

Dale

:-)  :-)

--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how 
you interpreted my words!



Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-27 Thread Mick
On Monday 28 Nov 2011 00:55:36 Colleen Beamer wrote:
 On 11/27/11 16:28, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
  Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
  On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
  Hi Colleen,
  
  Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
  Hi all,
  
  I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert from
  one
  format to another (jpg to png, for example). ImageMagick is installed
  on my system (installed as requirement of something else), but I'm
  darned if I can find an executable to run the program. There used to
  be
  one in /usr/bin on my old system.
  Does anyone have any experience with this?
  
  yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert
  
  This isn't quite what I wanted - you have to add options to the
  command.  I was hoping to get the graphical interface that I had
  before.  Please don't tell me they took a great little program and
  screwed it up!  :-)
  
  is /usr/bin/display the program you were looking for?
  It supports a subset of ImageMagick's functionality.
 
 Thank you!!!  This is EXACTLY it.  :-)  Like I said, haven't used this
 in a while and had forgotten about this!

I was also going to mention /usr/bin/display, but as I wasn't quick enough I 
will mention Kim4:

kde-misc/kim4
 Available versions:  
(4)
(~) 0.9.5 ~amd64 ~x86
 Installed versions:  0.9.5(4)(16:39:44 12/18/10)
 Homepage:http://www.kde-
apps.org/content/show.php/Kim+%28Kde+Image+Menu%29?content=11505
 Description: a Dolphin and Konqueror service menu for ImageMagick

in case you are using KDE apps.

-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick

2011-11-27 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:28:35 +0100
Michael Schreckenbauer grim...@gmx.de wrote:

 Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 17:04:24 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
  On 11/27/11 15:18, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
   Hi Colleen,
   
   Am Sonntag, 27. November 2011, 16:08:41 schrieb Colleen Beamer:
   Hi all,
   
   I used to use ImageMagick to quickly resize images and convert
   from one
   format to another (jpg to png, for example). ImageMagick is
   installed on my system (installed as requirement of something
   else), but I'm darned if I can find an executable to run the
   program. There used to be
   one in /usr/bin on my old system.
   Does anyone have any experience with this?
   
   yes :) It's /usr/bin/convert
  
  This isn't quite what I wanted - you have to add options to the
  command.  I was hoping to get the graphical interface that I had
  before.  Please don't tell me they took a great little program and
  screwed it up!  :-)
 
 is /usr/bin/display the program you were looking for?
 It supports a subset of ImageMagick's functionality.

There was also another GUI with commands like on this screenshot:
http://tuxradar.com/files/imagemagick-1.png but I do not remember how
to launch it. :-)

Robert



-- 
Róbert Čerňanský
E-mail: hslis...@zoznam.sk
Jabber: h...@jabber.sk



[gentoo-user] Imagemagick and gnome packages

2008-02-11 Thread Mick
I noticed a number of new gnome related packages dropping in all of a sudden 
as a result of the new svg USE flag in imagemagick:
=
# emerge -uptDv world

These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:

Calculating world dependencies... done!
[nomerge  ] net-print/hplip-2.7.10  USE=X ppds 
scanner -doc -fax -minimal -parport -snmp 
[nomerge  ]  dev-python/PyQt-3.17.3  USE=-debug -doc -examples 
[nomerge  ]   x11-libs/qscintilla-2.1-r1 [1.7.1] USE=python%* 
qt4%* -debug% -doc -examples% 
[ebuild  N]dev-python/qscintilla-python-2.1  USE=qt4 1,824 kB 
[ebuild U ] x11-libs/qscintilla-2.1-r1 [1.7.1] USE=python%* 
qt4%* -debug% -doc -examples% 0 kB 
[ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin-2.0.0.12 [2.0.0.11] 
USE=-restrict-javascript LINGUAS=el 
en_GB -af -ar -be -bg -ca -cs -da -de -es -es_AR -es_ES -eu -fi -fr -fy -fy_NL 
-ga -ga_IE -gu -gu_IN -he -hu -it -ja -ka -ko -ku -lt -mk -mn -nb -nb_NO -nl 
-nn -nn_NO -pa -pa_IN -pl -pt -pt_BR -pt_PT -ro -ru -sk -sl -sv -sv_SE -tr -uk 
-zh -zh_CN -zh_TW 
9,774 kB 
[nomerge  ] dev-python/qscintilla-python-2.1  USE=qt4 
[ebuild  N]  dev-python/PyQt4-4.3.3  USE=-debug -doc -examples 6,047 kB 
[ebuild U ] media-libs/xine-lib-1.1.10.1 [1.1.10] USE=X a52 aac aalib 
alsa dts dvd flac imagemagick mad mng modplug musepack nls opengl oss real 
sdl speex theora truetype v4l vcd vidix vorbis win32codecs xcb xv xvmc 
(-altivec) -arts -debug -directfb -dxr3 -esd -fbcon -gnome -gtk -ipv6 -jack 
-libcaca -mmap -pulseaudio -samba -wavpack -xinerama 
7,264 kB 
[ebuild U ]  media-gfx/imagemagick-6.3.7.9 [6.3.5.10] USE=X bzip2 jpeg 
perl png svg%* tiff truetype wmf xml 
zlib -djvu% -doc -fontconfig% -fpx -graphviz -gs -hdri -jbig -jpeg2k -lcms 
-nocxx -openexr -q32 -q8 
(-mpeg%*) 7,331 kB 
[ebuild  N]   gnome-base/librsvg-2.20.0  USE=zlib -debug -doc -gnome 453 
kB 
[ebuild U ] app-text/ghostscript-esp-8.15.4 [8.15.3] USE=X cups 
xml -cjk -djvu% -gtk -threads 8,580 kB 
[ebuild U ] app-admin/testdisk-6.8-r1 [6.5] USE=jpeg ntfs 
reiserfs -static 751 kB 
[ebuild U ]  sys-fs/ntfsprogs-2.0.0 [1.13.1-r1] 
USE=crypt -debug -fuse -gnome 883 kB 
[ebuild  N]   dev-libs/libconfig-1.2  494 kB 
[nomerge  ] gnome-base/librsvg-2.20.0  USE=zlib -debug -doc -gnome 
[ebuild  N]  gnome-extra/libgsf-1.14.7  USE=bzip2 
python -debug -doc -gnome 0 kB 
[nomerge  ] net-print/cups-1.2.12-r4  USE=X dbus jpeg ldap nls pam png 
ppds ssl tiff -php -samba -slp 
[nomerge  ]  net-libs/gnutls-2.0.4  USE=nls zlib -doc -guile -lzo 
[ebuild U ]   dev-libs/libtasn1-1.2 [0.3.5] USE=-doc 1,476 kB 
[ebuild  NS   ] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.23-r8  USE=-build -symlink 280 
kB 
[nomerge  ] dev-python/PyQt4-4.3.3  USE=-debug -doc -examples 
[ebuild U ]  dev-python/sip-4.7.3 [4.7.1] USE=-debug 436 kB 
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/dosfstools-2.11-r3 [2.11-r1] 0 kB 
[ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-launcher-1.58 [1.56] 7 kB 
[nomerge  ] net-print/cups-1.2.12-r4  USE=X dbus jpeg ldap nls pam png 
ppds ssl tiff -php -samba -slp 
[ebuild U ]  app-text/libpaper-1.1.23 [1.1.21] 343 kB 

Total: 18 packages (12 upgrades, 5 new, 1 in new slot), Size of downloads: 
45,936 kB
=

Other than setting -svg for imagemagick is there anything else I could do to 
keep these additional gnome packages out?
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[gentoo-user] Imagemagick fails

2006-07-08 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

revdep-rebuild tells me that I need to remerge ImageMagick, but then
fails during the remerge.  This is the error I get:

libxml2  -O2 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -pthread -MT
coders/coders_png_la-png.lo -MD -MP -MF
coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Tpo -c -o coders/coders_png_la-png.lo
`test -f 'coders/png.c' || echo './'`coders/png.c; \
then mv -f coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Tpo
coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Plo; else rm -f
coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Tpo; exit 1; fi
coders/png.c: In function 'ReadOnePNGImage':
coders/png.c:1755: warning: implicit declaration of function
'png_access_version'
coders/png.c:1764: error: 'png_ptr' undeclared (first use in this
function)
coders/png.c:1764: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
once
coders/png.c:1764: error: for each function it appears in.)
make: *** [coders/coders_png_la-png.lo] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs

!!! ERROR: media-gfx/imagemagick-6.2.5.5 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1539:   Called dyn_compile
  ebuild.sh, line 939:   Called src_compile
  imagemagick-6.2.5.5.ebuild, line 86:   Called die

Any ideas?

- --
gentux
echo hfouvyyAhnbjm/dpn | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'

gentux's gpg fingerprint == 5495 0388 67FF 0B89 1239  D840 4CF0 39E2
18D3 4A9E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEsEPUTPA54hjTSp4RAt1AAJ0Uwn+pbGdjEIAFIAvKg+zygmYmpwCffSW6
JoklQthphWWLh4h/qoxNPzw=
=zYM/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick fails

2006-07-08 Thread Ryan Tandy

gentuxx wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

revdep-rebuild tells me that I need to remerge ImageMagick, but then
fails during the remerge.  This is the error I get:

libxml2  -O2 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -pthread -MT
coders/coders_png_la-png.lo -MD -MP -MF
coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Tpo -c -o coders/coders_png_la-png.lo
`test -f 'coders/png.c' || echo './'`coders/png.c; \
then mv -f coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Tpo
coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Plo; else rm -f
coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Tpo; exit 1; fi
coders/png.c: In function 'ReadOnePNGImage':
coders/png.c:1755: warning: implicit declaration of function
'png_access_version'
coders/png.c:1764: error: 'png_ptr' undeclared (first use in this
function)
coders/png.c:1764: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
once
coders/png.c:1764: error: for each function it appears in.)
make: *** [coders/coders_png_la-png.lo] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs

!!! ERROR: media-gfx/imagemagick-6.2.5.5 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1539:   Called dyn_compile
  ebuild.sh, line 939:   Called src_compile
  imagemagick-6.2.5.5.ebuild, line 86:   Called die

Any ideas?

- --
gentux
echo hfouvyyAhnbjm/dpn | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'

gentux's gpg fingerprint == 5495 0388 67FF 0B89 1239  D840 4CF0 39E2
18D3 4A9E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEsEPUTPA54hjTSp4RAt1AAJ0Uwn+pbGdjEIAFIAvKg+zygmYmpwCffSW6
JoklQthphWWLh4h/qoxNPzw=
=zYM/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Try remerging libpng and/or libxml2.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick fails

2006-07-08 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ryan Tandy wrote:
 gentuxx wrote:
 revdep-rebuild tells me that I need to remerge ImageMagick, but then
 fails during the remerge.  This is the error I get:

 libxml2  -O2 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -pthread -MT
 coders/coders_png_la-png.lo -MD -MP -MF
 coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Tpo -c -o coders/coders_png_la-png.lo
 `test -f 'coders/png.c' || echo './'`coders/png.c; \
 then mv -f coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Tpo
 coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Plo; else rm -f
 coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Tpo; exit 1; fi
 coders/png.c: In function 'ReadOnePNGImage':
 coders/png.c:1755: warning: implicit declaration of function
 'png_access_version'
 coders/png.c:1764: error: 'png_ptr' undeclared (first use in this
 function)
 coders/png.c:1764: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
 once
 coders/png.c:1764: error: for each function it appears in.)
 make: *** [coders/coders_png_la-png.lo] Error 1
 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs

 !!! ERROR: media-gfx/imagemagick-6.2.5.5 failed.
 Call stack:
   ebuild.sh, line 1539:   Called dyn_compile
   ebuild.sh, line 939:   Called src_compile
   imagemagick-6.2.5.5.ebuild, line 86:   Called die

 Any ideas?

 

  Try remerging libpng and/or libxml2.


Thanks for the response, but, unfortunately, that didn't help.  I
re-ran revdep-rebuild with the -pv options this time, and realized
that tetex and graphviz also need to be recompiled.  They were also
immediately before imagemagick in the rebuild order.  I checked
`equery depgraph' and both were in the depgraph for imagemagick, so I
recompiled both of those and ran `fix_libtool_files.sh'.  That didn't
seem to work either.

I was able to capture this when it failed:

ImageMagick is configured as follows. Please verify that this
configuration
matches your expectations.

Host system type : i686-pc-linux-gnu

  OptionValue
- -
Shared libraries  --enable-shared=yes   yes
Static libraries  --enable-static=yes   yes
Module support--with-modules=yesyes
GNU ld--with-gnu-ld=yes yes
Quantum depth --with-quantum-depth=16   16

Delegate Configuration:
BZLIB --with-bzlib=no   no
DPS   --with-dps=yesno
FlashPIX  --with-fpx=no no
FreeType 2.0  --with-ttf=yesyes
GhostPCL  None  pcl6 (unknown)
Ghostscript   None  gs (8.15.2)
Ghostscript fonts
- --with-gs-font-dir=/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript
/usr/share/fonts/default/ghostscript/
Ghostscript lib   --with-gslib=no   no
Graphviz  --with-gvc=no no
JBIG  --with-jbig=nono
JPEG v1   --with-jpeg=yes   yes
JPEG-2000 --with-jp2=no no
LCMS  --with-lcms=nono
Magick++  --with-magick-plus-plus=yes   yes
PERL  --with-perl=nono
PNG   --with-png=yesyes
TIFF  --with-tiff=nono
Windows fonts --with-windows-font-dir=  none
WMF   --with-wmf=no no
X11   --with-x=yes  yes
XML   --with-xml=yesyes
ZLIB  --with-zlib=yes   yes


What's interesting to me is that all of the expected option/value
pairs match and/or make sense except for DPS.  So I installed gtkDPS
to see if that would make any difference.  The DPS option was now
enabled as expected, but the compile still fails in the same spot.

 --
 gentux
 echo hfouvyyAhnbjm/dpn | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'

 gentux's gpg fingerprint == 5495 0388 67FF 0B89 1239  D840 4CF0
 39E2 18D3 4A9E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEsGmCTPA54hjTSp4RAhREAJsHwvHGQrHvsIIZxqUL6MusRZOSOQCfWP05
hYh8Lec3eRXmI+a6iuwFzbM=
=s5Ca
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick fails

2006-07-08 Thread Ryan Tandy
if /bin/sh ./libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile 
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I./magick -I./wand 
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libxml2  -O2 -march=pentium4 
-pipe -Wall -pthread -MT coders/coders_png_la-png.lo -MD -MP -MF 
coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Tpo -c -o coders/coders_png_la-png.lo 
`test -f 'coders/png.c' || echo './'`coders/png.c; \
	then mv -f coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Tpo 
coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Plo; else rm -f 
coders/.deps/coders_png_la-png.Tpo; exit 1; fi

coders/png.c: In function 'ReadOnePNGImage':
coders/png.c:1755: warning: implicit declaration of function 
'png_access_version'

coders/png.c:1764: error: 'png_ptr' undeclared (first use in this function)
coders/png.c:1764: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
coders/png.c:1764: error: for each function it appears in.)
make: *** [coders/coders_png_la-png.lo] Error 1

!!! ERROR: media-gfx/imagemagick-6.2.5.5 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1545:   Called dyn_compile
  ebuild.sh, line 940:   Called src_compile
  imagemagick-6.2.5.5.ebuild, line 86:   Called die

!!! compile problem
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call 
stack if relevant.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $

Well. :P

On second thought, I should have checked Bugzilla *before* downloading 
and compiling all that...


https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136452

Bottom line: you need ~x86 libpng and imagemagick until libpng-1.2.12-r1 
and imagemagick-6.2.8.0 are stabled.


HTH. ;)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick fails

2006-07-08 Thread Mike
 Bottom line: you need ~x86 libpng and imagemagick until libpng-1.2.12-r1
 and imagemagick-6.2.8.0 are stabled.

If you dont want to install the packages from testing you can compile
imagemagick with the -png use flag set and it should work. That's what I
did until imagemagick and/or libpng was updated.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick convert utility; latest version has problems

2006-02-10 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
Le vendredi 10 février 2006 à 02:25 -0500, Walter Dnes a écrit :
   The latest unstable builds complain about not finding libMagick.so.6.

More or less random guess :
did you revdep-rebuild ?

Fred

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick convert utility; latest version has problems

2006-02-10 Thread Walter Dnes
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:14:26PM +0100, Fr?d?ric Grosshans wrote
 Le vendredi 10 f?vrier 2006 ? 02:25 -0500, Walter Dnes a ?crit :
The latest unstable builds complain about not finding libMagick.so.6.
 
 More or less random guess :
   did you revdep-rebuild ?

  Yes.  Neither revdep-rebuild --ask nor revdep-rebuild --ask --deep
found anything wrong.

-- 
Walter Dnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] In linux /sbin/init is Job #1
My musings on technology and security at http://tech_sec.blog.ca
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] ImageMagick convert utility; latest version has problems

2006-02-09 Thread Walter Dnes
  I've found a couple of ways to use ImageMagick's convert utility
to salvage underexposed digital photos.  Both methods preferentially
boost the brightness of darker pixels, so that dark areas are boosted,
without blowing out brighter areas.  My problem is that the latest
stable builds (6.2.2.5 and 6.2.4.2-r1) don't work, so I've had to mask
them out in /etc/portage/package.mask with the line

media-gfx/imagemagick-6.2.2.3-r1

  The two particular uses are...

1) a script called pwrr that uses a power curve, like so
#!/bin/bash
convert -depth 8 ${1} -fx u^${3} ${2}

example
pwrr input_file.tif output_file.tif 0.5

The lower the 3rd parameter, the more that dark areas get brightened.
Should be below 1 and greater than 0.  Approx 20 seconds to process a
2048x1536 TIFF on an AMD3000+ K8 (32-bit mode) with 2 gigs of RAM.


2) a script called logg that uses a logarithmic curve like so
#!/bin/bash
convert -depth 8 ${1} -fx ln(u*(${3}-1)+1)/ln(${3}) ${2}

example
logg input_file.tif output_file.tif 16

The higher the 3rd parameter, the more that dark areas get brightened.
The 3rd parameter *MUST* be greater than 1.  Approx 60 seconds to
process a 2048x1536 TIFF on an AMD3000+ K8 (32-bit mode) with 2 gigs of
RAM.


  The latest unstable builds complain about not finding libMagick.so.6.
If I create the appropriate symlink, convert runs, and returns
*INSTANTLY*, instead of taking time to process the file.  The output
file is a straight copy of the input file (minus metadata) with no
processing at all.  Other new builds do make the lib, but don't work.
They also create an unprocessed copy, and return instantly.

  The following ebuilds are available

imagemagick-6.1.8.8.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.0.4.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.0.6.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.1.5.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.1.5-r1.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.2.0.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.2.0-r1.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.2.3.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.2.3-r1.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.4.2.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.4.2-r1.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.5.2.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.5.4.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.5.5.ebuild
imagemagick-6.2.6.0.ebuild

  I set /etc/portage/package.keywords to accept ~x86 builds like so...
media-gfx/imagemagick ~x86

  I built 6.2.6.0.  I tested it, and it failed.  Tried 6.2.5.5, same
results.  Rinse, lather, repeat, with the immediately earlier version
each time.  It wasn't until I got down to 6.2.2.3-r1 that it worked.
Other relevant data...

AMD 3000+ K8 running in 32-bit mode

[m3000][root][~] emerge --pretend --verbose imagemagick

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild   R   ] media-gfx/imagemagick-6.2.2.3-r1  +X -cups +doc -fpx -graphviz 
-jbig +jpeg -lcms +mpeg -perl +png +tiff +truetype +wmf -xml2


CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -march=athlon -m3dnow -mmmx -msse -msse2 
-mfpmath=sse
CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
MAKEOPTS=-j1
USE=-* 3dnow X a52 aac alsa bzip2 cdr dga dio divx4linux dri dvd dvdr dvdread 
encode exif ffmpeg flac fortran gb gif gtk2 imlib jpeg maildir mikmod mime mmap 
mmx mng mp3 mpeg ncurses nptl nptlonly nsplugin offensive ogg opengl plotutils 
png posix quicktime readline sdl sharedmem slang sockets sse theora threads 
tiff truetype vcd vorbis win32codecs wmf xpm xv zlib

-- 
Walter Dnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] In linux /sbin/init is Job #1
My musings on technology and security at http://tech_sec.blog.ca
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick -contrast-stretch

2006-02-03 Thread Martins Steinbergs
On Friday 03 February 2006 09:51, John Green wrote:
 convert input.jpg -contrast-stretch 10% output.jpg

my installation is working with this

media-gfx/imagemagick-6.2.6.0  USE=X jpeg mpeg perl png tiff truetype xml2 
zlib -bzip2 -doc -fpx -graphviz -gs -jbig -lcms -nocxx -wmf


m
-- 
Linux 2.6.15-ck2 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+
 10:05:47 up 55 min,  6 users,  load average: 1.05, 1.74, 2.41


pgpb3Vwcdw20q.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] ImageMagick -contrast-stretch

2006-02-03 Thread John Green
Martins Steinbergs wrote:

On Friday 03 February 2006 09:51, John Green wrote:
  

convert input.jpg -contrast-stretch 10% output.jpg



my installation is working with this

media-gfx/imagemagick-6.2.6.0  USE=X jpeg mpeg perl png tiff truetype xml2 
zlib -bzip2 -doc -fpx -graphviz -gs -jbig -lcms -nocxx -wmf


m
  

Thanks to Martin and Alexander.

Upgrading fixed the problem, as you suggested.

To get the upgrade, I added media-gfx/imagemagick to
/etc/portage/package.keywords, so my system will now
iupgrade to every new version of ImageMagick that has an ebuild.
The last automatic upgrade I saw (January 26)
was to version 6.2.5.5 to fix security bug #83542.  
I can't be sure from the ImageMagick ChangeLog that
the security fix is also in 6.2.6.0.  Am I worrying about nothing?

Thanks again,

John Green
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] ImageMagick -contrast-stretch

2006-02-02 Thread John Green

Hi,

The ImageMagick option -contrast-stretch is not recognised
in my installation (6.2.5 01/31/06 Q16).  The option is documented on the
IM web-site.

If the option exists on your installationi, or you have any insights,
please reply here with your version, so I can decide whether and
where to file a bug-report.

You can do something like this:

convert input.jpg -contrast-stretch 10% output.jpg

Thanks.

J Green
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list