Re: [gentoo-user] Migration to baselayout2 / openrc
Hi, for this weekend I planned to migrate to baselayout 2 finally. On gentoo web I found this: 2. Migration to OpenRC Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulled in as part of your regular upgrade process by your package manager. I tried to check this (emerge -pv openrc) and found: !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy sys-apps/openrc have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sys-apps/openrc- (masked by: missing keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.5.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r4 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.1-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) Especially masked by: missing keyword let me doubt whether or not it is sane to migrate How to proceed here ? I had originally migrated an entirely ~x86 system. Then I downgraded almost all of the system, except for openrc co because it was enough work to upgrade, so I didn't want to downgrade to x86 and then eventually openrc migrate again. For the most part, the Gentoo Baselayout and OpenRC migration Guide is fine. You can see my package.keywords for openrc on an otherwise stable system below. I leave in some garbage comments since it might give you an idea what I toyed around with. #Dependencies to keep openrc with otherwise ARCH=x86 #=sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r3 ~x86 =sys-apps/openrc-0.4.1-r1 ~x86 =sys-apps/baselayout-2.0.0 ~x86 #=sys-fs/udev-145 ~x86 =sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86-r12 ~x86 #=sys-devel/libtool-2.2.4 ~x86 #=sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.41.8 ~x86 #=sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.8 ~x86 =sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86 ~x86 =sys-fs/cryptsetup-1.0.6-r2 ~x86 # udev-145 messes up libvolume_id (see bug 281632) #=sys-apps/hal-0.5.13-r2 ~x86 #=sys-apps/util-linux-2.16-r1 ~x86 Regards, daid
Re: [gentoo-user] Migration to baselayout2 / openrc
Eray Aslan wrote: On 10.10.2009 13:01, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: On gentoo web I found this: 2. Migration to OpenRC Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulled in as part of your regular upgrade process by your package manager. PPP startup scripts still do not work with openrc. Just a heads up in case you use them. OK. This has me wondering something. I have DSL but I have dial-up for my back-up. Does either of these use ppp? I think my modem uses pppoe but I think that is between the modem and ATT but nothing to do with the connection between the puter and the modem. I do know the dial-up modem uses ppp tho. That I am sure of. Would this affect me at least on the dial-up? DSL would be OK right? Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Migration to baselayout2 / openrc
On Monday 12 October 2009 07:33:33 Eray Aslan wrote: On 10.10.2009 13:01, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: On gentoo web I found this: 2. Migration to OpenRC Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulled in as part of your regular upgrade process by your package manager. PPP startup scripts still do not work with openrc. Just a heads up in case you use them. No. The new /etc/init.d/network script doesn't work support ppp yet, but openrc still support the old baselayout behavior. If you emerge openrc without changing any USE flag, it will have the oldnet USE enabled by default, and will support your old /etc/conf.d/net file. So there is no problem for ppp users. --- TopperH http://topperh.blogspot.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Migration to baselayout2 / openrc
On 10.10.2009 13:01, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: On gentoo web I found this: 2. Migration to OpenRC Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulled in as part of your regular upgrade process by your package manager. PPP startup scripts still do not work with openrc. Just a heads up in case you use them. -- Eray
[gentoo-user] Migration to baselayout2 / openrc
Hi, for this weekend I planned to migrate to baselayout 2 finally. On gentoo web I found this: 2. Migration to OpenRC Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulled in as part of your regular upgrade process by your package manager. I tried to check this (emerge -pv openrc) and found: !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy sys-apps/openrc have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sys-apps/openrc- (masked by: missing keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.5.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r4 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.1-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) Especially masked by: missing keyword let me doubt whether or not it is sane to migrate How to proceed here ? Best regards, mcc -- Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows.
Re: [gentoo-user] Migration to baselayout2 / openrc
On Saturday 10 October 2009, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, for this weekend I planned to migrate to baselayout 2 finally. On gentoo web I found this: 2. Migration to OpenRC Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulled in as part of your regular upgrade process by your package manager. I tried to check this (emerge -pv openrc) and found: !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy sys-apps/openrc have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sys-apps/openrc- (masked by: missing keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.5.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r4 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.1-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) Especially masked by: missing keyword let me doubt whether or not it is sane to migrate How to proceed here ? Many users who populate this list have unmasked it and emerged it without a problem. I am still holding onto the stable path and won't be upgrading as yet - perhaps because the benefits of doing so are not earth shattering, plus I'll have to learn new invocations to update my systems. Mind you, I'll have to learn them sooner or later when it becomes stable. YMMV. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Migration to baselayout2 / openrc
On Saturday 10 October 2009 12:01:19 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, for this weekend I planned to migrate to baselayout 2 finally. On gentoo web I found this: 2. Migration to OpenRC Migration to OpenRC is fairly straightforward; it will be pulled in as part of your regular upgrade process by your package manager. I tried to check this (emerge -pv openrc) and found: !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy sys-apps/openrc have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sys-apps/openrc- (masked by: missing keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.5.1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r4 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r3 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.3-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - sys-apps/openrc-0.4.1-r1 (masked by: ~x86 keyword) Especially masked by: missing keyword let me doubt whether or not it is sane to migrate How to proceed here ? openrc needs to be in your packages.keywords as it's still unstable. The - version is not keyworded at all, which is right and proper for the version in cvs -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
Re: [gentoo-user] Migration to baselayout2 / openrc
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:01:19 +0200 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: for this weekend I planned to migrate to baselayout 2 finally. ... Especially masked by: missing keyword let me doubt whether or not it is sane to migrate How to proceed here ? I'd suggest to delay the update 'till it hits stable. Stable and testing are different branches, after all, and if you mix them, results should be pretty much unpredictable, since both are tested as-is. So any package in your (stable) branch will have baselayout-1 compatible script running with openrc and baselayout-2 scripts, which are _known_ to be incompatible in some cases. Of course, hitting stable branch should mean that package spent some time in testing and init-script has been modified to be compatible with both branches, but still I doubt that the overal result should be more stable than testing branch, since no-one has really tested your particular package mix. -- Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net signature.asc Description: PGP signature
