Re: [gentoo-user] Nepomuk is eating my disk space

2011-09-27 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am Dienstag 27 September 2011, 03:18:56 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> Hello list,
> 
> My /home partition is 15GB, and the other day KDE warned me it was down to
> 1% free. I found that
> .kde4/share/apps/nepomuk/repository/main/data/virtuosobackend/soprano-
> virtuoso.db
> was occupying 12GB, so I deleted it and rebooted.
> 
> Today it's already 3GB after only a few days. B.g.o has no virtuosobackend
> or soprano-virtuoso.db bugs. As it's apparently impossible nowadays to
> install KDE without nepomuk and friends, what does the team think is a good
> way to tame this beast? This is an amd64 box, not ~amd64.

well, you can turn it off.
problem solved.

last time I checked, nepomuk took 28mb... yeah megabytes.

And for ram usage: there is a setting for that.

-- 
#163933



Re: [gentoo-user] Nepomuk is eating my disk space

2011-09-26 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 05:49:24 Indi wrote:

> Ah, yet another marvelous benefit of using kde.

Indeed. I do try Gnome occasionally to see how it's progressing, but I can't 
get on with it - far too arrogant. And the others I've tried are too skinny 
to do all the things I want. So it's KDE and like it I'm afraid.

-- 
Rgds
Peter   Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23


Re: [gentoo-user] Nepomuk is eating my disk space

2011-09-26 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 03:42:12 Nils Larsson wrote:

> You could disable it(search for Nepomuk in systemsettings). That's what I
> did. Got tired of nepomukindexer spawning hundreds of instances of
> itself and eating all my memory...

Ah, yes, of course - thanks.

-- 
Rgds
Peter   Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23


Re: [gentoo-user] Nepomuk is eating my disk space

2011-09-26 Thread Indi
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 03:18:56AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>Hello list,
> 
>My /home partition is 15GB, and the other day KDE warned me it was down
>to 1% free. I found that
>.kde4/share/apps/nepomuk/repository/main/data/virtuosobackend/soprano-v
>irtuoso.db
> 
>was occupying 12GB, so I deleted it and rebooted.
> 
>Today it's already 3GB after only a few days. B.g.o has no
>virtuosobackend or soprano-virtuoso.db bugs. As it's apparently
>impossible nowadays to install KDE without nepomuk and friends, what
>does the team think is a good way to tame this beast? This is an amd64
>box, not ~amd64.
> 

Ah, yet another marvelous benefit of using kde.
I suppose you could just create a cron job that deletes it every
night...

-- 
caveat utilitor
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ 



Re: [gentoo-user] Nepomuk is eating my disk space

2011-09-26 Thread Nils Larsson
tisdagen den 27 september 2011 04:18:56 skrev  Peter Humphrey:
> Hello list,
> 
> My /home partition is 15GB, and the other day KDE warned me it was down to
> 1% free. I found that
> .kde4/share/apps/nepomuk/repository/main/data/virtuosobackend/soprano-
> virtuoso.db
> was occupying 12GB, so I deleted it and rebooted.
> 
> Today it's already 3GB after only a few days. B.g.o has no virtuosobackend
> or soprano-virtuoso.db bugs. As it's apparently impossible nowadays to
> install KDE without nepomuk and friends, what does the team think is a good
> way to tame this beast? This is an amd64 box, not ~amd64.

You could disable it(search for Nepomuk in systemsettings). That's what I did. 
Got tired of nepomukindexer spawning hundreds of instances of itself and 
eating all my memory...




[gentoo-user] Nepomuk is eating my disk space

2011-09-26 Thread Peter Humphrey
Hello list,

My /home partition is 15GB, and the other day KDE warned me it was down to 
1% free. I found that 
.kde4/share/apps/nepomuk/repository/main/data/virtuosobackend/soprano-
virtuoso.db
was occupying 12GB, so I deleted it and rebooted.

Today it's already 3GB after only a few days. B.g.o has no virtuosobackend 
or soprano-virtuoso.db bugs. As it's apparently impossible nowadays to 
install KDE without nepomuk and friends, what does the team think is a good 
way to tame this beast? This is an amd64 box, not ~amd64.

-- 
Rgds
Peter   Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23