Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness
Bo Ørsted Andresen: Look at the first section at the GWN from the 16. of January [1]. Also this (autouse) has recently been added to the release notes of portage 2.1 [2] (they forgot until now). Thanks! I didn't subscribe to the GWN. My fault ;-) Sergio -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness
Mick: As I understand it (I'm sure this has been covered in GWN, forums, etc.) USE flags which had been set automatically by certain packages are no longer valid universally. Therefore, either add those USE flags missing (e.g. ldap mozilla for OOo) in your /etc/make.conf, or if you only want them for a particular package add them in /etc/portage/package.use. I'm sure (I'ld like to be sure) that this change is documented somewhere, but I can't find where. I need documentation because I'm an advanced user of some packages (f.i., tetex), but a naive user of other ones (f.i., xine). So I can't understand why and how I should re-emerge xine because of: [ebuild R ] media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r5 USE=X ncurses nls readline -aalib -curl* -libcaca -lirc -vdr -xinerama 0 kB Any hints? Thanks Sergio -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness
Sergio Polini wrote: Mick: As I understand it (I'm sure this has been covered in GWN, forums, etc.) USE flags which had been set automatically by certain packages are no longer valid universally. Therefore, either add those USE flags missing (e.g. ldap mozilla for OOo) in your /etc/make.conf, or if you only want them for a particular package add them in /etc/portage/package.use. I'm sure (I'ld like to be sure) that this change is documented somewhere, but I can't find where. I need documentation because I'm an advanced user of some packages (f.i., tetex), but a naive user of other ones (f.i., xine). So I can't understand why and how I should re-emerge xine because of: [ebuild R ] media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r5 USE=X ncurses nls readline -aalib -curl* -libcaca -lirc -vdr -xinerama 0 kB Any hints? Thanks Sergio Hi, This is because of a new USE-flag -curl* which previously was ON. Means you'll have to reemerge xine-ui or enable 'curl' for xine-ui in package.use. HTH.Rumen smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness
On 15/06/06, Rumen Yotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is because of a new USE-flag -curl* which previously was ON. Means you'll have to reemerge xine-ui or enable 'curl' for xine-ui in package.use. Or add curl in your /etc/make.conf to apply it across all packages, or add: USE_ORDER=env:pkg:conf:auto:defaults to restore portage to its previous version behaviour; i.e. automatic flags being imposed by emerged new packages across the piece. -- Regards, Mick -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness
On Thursday 15 June 2006 21:55, Sergio Polini wrote: I'm sure (I'ld like to be sure) that this change is documented somewhere, but I can't find where. I need documentation because I'm an advanced user of some packages (f.i., tetex), but a naive user of other ones (f.i., xine). So I can't understand why and how I should re-emerge xine because of: [ebuild R ] media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r5 USE=X ncurses nls readline -aalib -curl* -libcaca -lirc -vdr -xinerama 0 kB Any hints? Look at the first section at the GWN from the 16. of January [1]. Also this (autouse) has recently been added to the release notes of portage 2.1 [2] (they forgot until now). [1] http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060116-newsletter.xml [2] http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES?view=markup -- Bo Andresen pgp78pKwImjdJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness
Hmm... after having updated to portage 2.1 which has become stable, I get this weird output from emerge and revdep-rebuild: OUTPUT from emerge --pretend --update --deep --newuse world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating world dependencies... done! [ebuild R ] net-fs/samba-3.0.22 USE=-ldap* [ebuild R ] dev-java/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03 USE=-mozilla* [ebuild R ] media-gfx/autotrace-0.31.1-r1 USE=-imagemagick* [ebuild R ] net-ftp/proftpd-1.2.10-r7 USE=-ldap* [ebuild R ] app-crypt/gnupg-1.4.2.2 USE=-curl* -ldap* [ebuild R ] app-crypt/gnupg-1.9.20-r3 USE=-ldap* [ebuild R ] www-client/mozilla-1.7.13 USE=-ldap* [ebuild R ] mail-filter/spamassassin-3.1.3 USE=-ldap* -sqlite* [ebuild R ] gnome-extra/evolution-data-server-1.4.2.1 USE=-ldap* [ebuild R ] mail-client/evolution-2.4.2.1 USE=-ldap* [ebuild R ] media-libs/libsdl-1.2.8-r1 USE=-nas* [ebuild R ] media-libs/libao-0.8.5 USE=-nas* [ebuild R ] net-im/gaim-1.5.0 USE=-nas* [ebuild R ] mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-1.5.0.4 USE=-ldap* [ebuild R ] net-libs/gecko-sdk-1.7.13 USE=-ldap* [ebuild R ] gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner-2.12.3 USE=-cdr* [ebuild R ] app-editors/xemacs-21.4.15-r3 USE=-ldap* -nas* [ebuild R ] dev-libs/apr-util-0.9.7 USE=-ldap* [ebuild R ] dev-python/gnome-python-2.12.1 USE=-gtkhtml* [ebuild R ] dev-python/gnome-python-extras-2.12.0 USE=-mozilla* [ebuild R ] media-video/gpac-0.4.1_pre20060122 USE=-mozilla* [ebuild R ] net-misc/openssh-4.3_p2-r1 USE=-ldap* [ebuild R ] media-sound/timidity++-2.13.2 USE=-nas* [ebuild R ] net-www/apache-2.0.55-r1 USE=-ldap* [ebuild R ] net-misc/curl-7.15.1-r1 USE=-idn* -ldap* [ebuild R ] x11-libs/qt-3.3.6-r1 USE=-nas* -sqlite* [ebuild R ] dev-java/swt-3.2_rc2 USE=-mozilla* [ebuild R ] dev-libs/cyrus-sasl-2.1.21-r2 USE=-ldap* [ebuild R ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.2-r1 USE=-ldap* -mozilla* [ebuild R ] dev-lang/php-5.1.4 USE=-curl* -ldap* -mhash* -sqlite* [ebuild R ] gnome-extra/gnome-games-2.12.3 USE=-guile* [ebuild R ] dev-util/eclipse-sdk-3.0.1-r2 USE=-mozilla* [ebuild R ] dev-lang/swig-1.3.21 USE=-guile* [ebuild R ] media-gfx/gimp-2.2.8-r1 USE=-gtkhtml* [ebuild R ] gnome-base/gnome-2.12.3 USE=-cdr* [ebuild R ] app-emulation/wine-0.9.8-r1 USE=-ldap* -nas* [ebuild R ] www-client/elinks-0.10.6 USE=-guile* -idn* -lua* - OUTPUT from revdep-rebuild --pretend All prepared. Starting rebuild... emerge --oneshot --pretend =sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r1 =sys-devel/gcc-4.1.1 These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R ] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r1 USE=-ip32r10k% [ebuild R ] sys-devel/gcc-4.1.1 - Recompiling that much (especially OpenOffice) just because of an update to Portage seems quite excessive to me. - Kristian Poul Herkild -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness
Kristian Poul Herkild wrote: Hmm... after having updated to portage 2.1 which has become stable, I get this weird output from emerge and revdep-rebuild: OUTPUT from emerge --pretend --update --deep --newuse world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Try without the --newuse flag. m. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness
On 11/06/06, Kristian Poul Herkild [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... after having updated to portage 2.1 which has become stable, I get this weird output from emerge and revdep-rebuild: [snip . . . ] Recompiling that much (especially OpenOffice) just because of an update to Portage seems quite excessive to me. As I understand it (I'm sure this has been covered in GWN, forums, etc.) USE flags which had been set automatically by certain packages are no longer valid universally. Therefore, either add those USE flags missing (e.g. ldap mozilla for OOo) in your /etc/make.conf, or if you only want them for a particular package add them in /etc/portage/package.use. HTH -- Regards, Mick -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness
Mick wrote: On 11/06/06, Kristian Poul Herkild [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... after having updated to portage 2.1 which has become stable, I get this weird output from emerge and revdep-rebuild: [snip . . . ] Recompiling that much (especially OpenOffice) just because of an update to Portage seems quite excessive to me. As I understand it (I'm sure this has been covered in GWN, forums, etc.) USE flags which had been set automatically by certain packages are no longer valid universally. Therefore, either add those USE flags missing (e.g. ldap mozilla for OOo) in your /etc/make.conf, or if you only want them for a particular package add them in /etc/portage/package.use. HTH Well, I noticed that when I ran revdep-rebuild -p mine wanted to reemerge gcc too, so I let it. Then I went back and ran revdep-rebuild again and it still wants to reemerge gcc. I did the next thing I could think of and did a emerge -e system. When I ran revdep-rebuild -p again afterwards, it wanted to reemerge gcc again. Same as the OP, why does it want to go in circles reemerging gcc?? :-/ Dale :-) :-) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness
Mick wrote: On 11/06/06, Kristian Poul Herkild [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... after having updated to portage 2.1 which has become stable, I get this weird output from emerge and revdep-rebuild: [snip . . . ] Recompiling that much (especially OpenOffice) just because of an update to Portage seems quite excessive to me. As I understand it (I'm sure this has been covered in GWN, forums, etc.) USE flags which had been set automatically by certain packages are no longer valid universally. Therefore, either add those USE flags missing (e.g. ldap mozilla for OOo) in your /etc/make.conf, or if you only want them for a particular package add them in /etc/portage/package.use. HTH Thank you :) That explains it. 'ldap' and 'mozilla' added to make.conf. I wonder why I didn't have them there already. Oh well.. fire up nano! -Kristian Herkild -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness
Teresa and Dale wrote: Well, I noticed that when I ran revdep-rebuild -p mine wanted to reemerge gcc too, so I let it. Then I went back and ran revdep-rebuild again and it still wants to reemerge gcc. I did the next thing I could think of and did a emerge -e system. When I ran revdep-rebuild -p again afterwards, it wanted to reemerge gcc again. Same as the OP, why does it want to go in circles reemerging gcc?? :-/ Dale :-) :-) Lucky bastard. At least you can compile GCC. -Kristian -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness
On 6/11/06, Teresa and Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same as the OP, why does it want to go in circles reemerging gcc?? :-/ http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org/msg34390.html -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
