Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [entirely ON topic] Thanks to the devs
On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:16:51 +0800 kwk...@hkbn.net wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2012 02:03:07 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:42:15 -0700 walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/23/2012 12:10 PM, Michael Mol wrote: I've noticed a lot of overt participation on this list by gentoo devs[1], especially in scenarios where they're explaining rationales and reasoning behind changes that affect users. I'd just like to say thank you for the work you guys do. Thank you for the work you guys do. I posted the same, but a long time ago, so I'll add a mee too. Another me too. (Thanking the suse devs here would of course be very inappropriate ;) But then you'd be excluding gregkh and *that* would be very inappropriate ;-) Is gregkh still a SUSE dev? I thought he now works for Linux Foundation (since February). He did mention on his blog at the time he wanted to continue working on SuSE and Gentoo kernels. As for what he is actually doing these day, I don't know -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
[gentoo-user] Re: [entirely ON topic] Thanks to the devs
On 05/23/2012 12:10 PM, Michael Mol wrote: I've noticed a lot of overt participation on this list by gentoo devs[1], especially in scenarios where they're explaining rationales and reasoning behind changes that affect users. I'd just like to say thank you for the work you guys do. Thank you for the work you guys do. I posted the same, but a long time ago, so I'll add a mee too. (Thanking the suse devs here would of course be very inappropriate ;)
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [entirely ON topic] Thanks to the devs
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:42:15 -0700 walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/23/2012 12:10 PM, Michael Mol wrote: I've noticed a lot of overt participation on this list by gentoo devs[1], especially in scenarios where they're explaining rationales and reasoning behind changes that affect users. I'd just like to say thank you for the work you guys do. Thank you for the work you guys do. I posted the same, but a long time ago, so I'll add a mee too. (Thanking the suse devs here would of course be very inappropriate ;) But then you'd be excluding gregkh and *that* would be very inappropriate ;-) -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [entirely ON topic] Thanks to the devs
On Thu, 24 May 2012 02:03:07 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:42:15 -0700 walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/23/2012 12:10 PM, Michael Mol wrote: I've noticed a lot of overt participation on this list by gentoo devs[1], especially in scenarios where they're explaining rationales and reasoning behind changes that affect users. I'd just like to say thank you for the work you guys do. Thank you for the work you guys do. I posted the same, but a long time ago, so I'll add a mee too. Another me too. (Thanking the suse devs here would of course be very inappropriate ;) But then you'd be excluding gregkh and *that* would be very inappropriate ;-) Is gregkh still a SUSE dev? I thought he now works for Linux Foundation (since February). Kerwin. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
