[gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed: Filesize does not match recorded size

[Alexander Kapshuk]

On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
 wrote:
> I've been getting this output since last night.
>
> Calculating dependencies  ... ... done!
> [ebuild U  ] app-shells/bash-4.3_p48 [4.3_p46-r1]
> [ebuild U  ] x11-libs/libX11-1.6.4 [1.6.3]
> [ebuild U  ] x11-libs/libXrender-0.9.10 [0.9.9]
> [ebuild U  ] x11-libs/libXfixes-5.0.3 [5.0.2]
> [ebuild U  ] x11-libs/libXi-1.7.7 [1.7.6]
> [ebuild U  ] x11-libs/libXrandr-1.5.1 [1.5.0]
> [ebuild U  ] x11-libs/libXv-1.0.11 [1.0.10]
> [ebuild U  ] x11-libs/libXtst-1.2.3 [1.2.2]
>
> Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No]
>
 Verifying ebuild manifests
>
> !!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/x11-libs/libX11/libX11-1.6.4.ebuild
> !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
> !!! Got: 1619
> !!! Expected: 1620
>
> !!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/x11-libs/libXrender/libXrender-0.9.10.ebuild
> !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
> !!! Got: 649
> !!! Expected: 650
>
> !!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/x11-libs/libXfixes/libXfixes-5.0.3.ebuild
> !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
> !!! Got: 709
> !!! Expected: 710
>
> !!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/x11-libs/libXi/libXi-1.7.7.ebuild
> !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
> !!! Got: 973
> !!! Expected: 974
>
> !!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/x11-libs/libXrandr/libXrandr-1.5.1.ebuild
> !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
> !!! Got: 798
> !!! Expected: 799
>
> !!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/x11-libs/libXv/libXv-1.0.11.ebuild
> !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
> !!! Got: 669
> !!! Expected: 670
>
> !!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/x11-libs/libXtst/libXtst-1.2.3.ebuild
> !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
> !!! Got: 831
> !!! Expected: 832
>
> I tried again this morning using two different mirrors, which still
> failed with the same error messages displayed as above.
>
> Is it worth waiting a bit more for new Manifest files to become available?
>
> Or is there some other way to fix this, like running 'ebuild
> /path/to/ebuild manifest', as suggested here:
> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7414010.html
>
> Thanks.

Been able to update the 'x11-libs/libX*' packages today.
Thanks.

[gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed: Filesize does not match recorded size

[»Q«]

On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 10:59:59 +0300
Alexander Kapshuk  wrote:

> >>> Verifying ebuild manifests  
> 
> !!! Digest verification failed:
> !!! /usr/portage/x11-libs/libX11/libX11-1.6.4.ebuild
> !!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
> !!! Got: 1619
> !!! Expected: 1620



Lots of mirrors are affected.  Fitzcarraldo's post in
 has a way to get
around it if you feel the need to immediately, by regenerating your
manifests locally.  (I'm not recommending doing that, just pointing out
that one can.)

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[Neil Bothwick]

On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:03:05 -0500, »Q« wrote:
> > I tried a few with no joy. As it appeared to be only the  ebuild
> > causing the problem, I deleted the file and removed the corresponding
> > line from the Manifest.  
> 
> I tried a few with no joy, too, and now I've done as you suggest.
> Thanks for that -- I'd thought portage would complain if I did that.

It complains if you add or remove files, but by removing both the file
and its reference n the Manifest, everything stays consistent. Whether
being able to do that is a convenience or a security risk is a matter of
preference, but until Manifests are signed it is doable.

> I'm one of the nuts who has USE="-*", and I've finally hit a situation
> where it causes considerable headaches;

It was only a matter of time...

>  plasma 5 requires a lot of
> per-package USE stuff, all handled in the profile thanks to careful
> work from the devs.  Instead of trying to tackle it package-by-package,
> for now I've just copied the profile's package.use to
> my /etc/portage/package-use.  I think this will be too much for me to
> maintain as plasma 5 and the profile change, so when I get some time
> I'll be ditching USE="-*" in order to rely on the profile.  My fellow
> USE="-*" loonies who will have to move to plasma 5 might want to
> consider ditching USE="-*" first.

So you're using the supplied wheels now instead of removing them and
trying to reinvent your own square ones now? ;-)


-- 
Neil Bothwick

It's not a bug, it's tradition!


pgpAHMXHuecai.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[Valmor de Almeida]

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Neil Bothwick  wrote:

> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 19:56:34 -0500, »Q« wrote:
>
> > > >Hello,
> > > >I have done several
> > > >emerge --sync
> > > >today but the digest verification problem below does not go away.
> > > >Any thoughts?
> > > >Thank you.
> > >
> > > This has been reported in Bug 579204 [0] and, as far as I am aware,
> > > was either caused by bad timing between commits and rsync metadata
> > > generation or some other factor in generating the metadata being
> > > pushed out to rsync servers; though from what I've seen it seems to
> > > only affect some mirrors.
> > >
> > > 0: https://bugs.gentoo.org/579204
> >
> > If anyone knows of a good rsync mirror, please post.  (This has hit me
> > in the middle of migration to plasma 5, perfect timing.)
>
> I tried a few with no joy. As it appeared to be only the  ebuild
> causing the problem, I deleted the file and removed the corresponding
> line from the Manifest.
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> Death to all fanatics!
>

At this time still a problem. Did what Neil suggested above; good to go and
moving forward.
Thanks,

--
Valmor

[gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[»Q«]

On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:14:30 +0100
Neil Bothwick  wrote:

> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 19:56:34 -0500, »Q« wrote:

> > > 0: https://bugs.gentoo.org/579204
> > 
> > If anyone knows of a good rsync mirror, please post.  (This has hit
> > me in the middle of migration to plasma 5, perfect timing.)  
> 
> I tried a few with no joy. As it appeared to be only the  ebuild
> causing the problem, I deleted the file and removed the corresponding
> line from the Manifest.

I tried a few with no joy, too, and now I've done as you suggest.
Thanks for that -- I'd thought portage would complain if I did that.

The delay may have saved me a little bit of pain.  Before re-syncing
today, something I didn't understand was preventing okular being
rebuilt after switching to the desktop/plasma profile, but not now.

I'm one of the nuts who has USE="-*", and I've finally hit a situation
where it causes considerable headaches;  plasma 5 requires a lot of
per-package USE stuff, all handled in the profile thanks to careful
work from the devs.  Instead of trying to tackle it package-by-package,
for now I've just copied the profile's package.use to
my /etc/portage/package-use.  I think this will be too much for me to
maintain as plasma 5 and the profile change, so when I get some time
I'll be ditching USE="-*" in order to rely on the profile.  My fellow
USE="-*" loonies who will have to move to plasma 5 might want to
consider ditching USE="-*" first.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[Neil Bothwick]

On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 19:56:34 -0500, »Q« wrote:

> > >Hello,
> > >I have done several
> > >emerge --sync
> > >today but the digest verification problem below does not go away.
> > >Any thoughts?
> > >Thank you.
> > 
> > This has been reported in Bug 579204 [0] and, as far as I am aware,
> > was either caused by bad timing between commits and rsync metadata
> > generation or some other factor in generating the metadata being
> > pushed out to rsync servers; though from what I've seen it seems to
> > only affect some mirrors.
> > 
> > 0: https://bugs.gentoo.org/579204  
> 
> If anyone knows of a good rsync mirror, please post.  (This has hit me
> in the middle of migration to plasma 5, perfect timing.)

I tried a few with no joy. As it appeared to be only the  ebuild
causing the problem, I deleted the file and removed the corresponding
line from the Manifest.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Death to all fanatics!


pgpgIXMdAtpl5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[J. Roeleveld]

On April 8, 2016 4:15:04 AM GMT+02:00, Valmor de Almeida  
wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:14 PM, R0b0t1  wrote:
>
>> Use webrsync or webrsync-gpg and see if the problem persists.
>>
>
>Waited for a few hours and tried both
>
>  emerge --sync
>
>and
>
> emerge-webrsync
>
>still problematic.
>
>Thanks for the replies.
>
>--
>Valmor

Try downloading a snapshot from the gentoo servers?

--
Joost 
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[Valmor de Almeida]

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:14 PM, R0b0t1  wrote:

> Use webrsync or webrsync-gpg and see if the problem persists.
>

Waited for a few hours and tried both

  emerge --sync

and

 emerge-webrsync

still problematic.

Thanks for the replies.

--
Valmor

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[R0b0t1]

Use webrsync or webrsync-gpg and see if the problem persists.

[gentoo-user] Re: Digest verification failed:

[»Q«]

On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:26:07 +1000
Sam Jorna  wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 06:52:20PM -0400, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> >Hello,
> >I have done several
> >emerge --sync
> >today but the digest verification problem below does not go away.
> >Any thoughts?
> >Thank you.  
> 
> This has been reported in Bug 579204 [0] and, as far as I am aware,
> was either caused by bad timing between commits and rsync metadata
> generation or some other factor in generating the metadata being
> pushed out to rsync servers; though from what I've seen it seems to
> only affect some mirrors.
> 
> 0: https://bugs.gentoo.org/579204

If anyone knows of a good rsync mirror, please post.  (This has hit me
in the middle of migration to plasma 5, perfect timing.)