Re: [gentoo-user] Re: best rss reader?
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 3:44 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Really? Masked as in package.mask? When? I don't see that. > I use it too, and it is better than the alternatives IMO. i'm on ~amd, is this related to why you don't see it? from `/var/db/repos/gentoo/profiles/package.mask`: ``` # Michał Górny (2020-04-19) # Both packages are unmaintained and have unresolved bugs. stfl # is stuck on Python 3.6 and newsboat is its only revdep. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #718286. dev-libs/stfl net-news/newsboat ``` i highly appreciate mgorny's work though. thanks to him, now i'm aware of the shortcomings, and looks like i'm now headed to get me a better rss reader. also thanks to those who helped me in this thread. highly appreciated. i'm now trying your ideas, and very optimistic i'll find a better rss reader setup.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: best rss reader?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:25:45PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2020-04-20 05:09, Ashley Dixon wrote: > > > [1] https://github.com/kouya/snownews > > Snownews seems to lack SSL support completely, or am I wrong? The great > majority of feeds I read are https:// URLs. No, you're right, it does lack S.S.L. I just haven't noticed it before since all the feeds to which I subscribe are rather esoteric or old. For example, all of the B.B.C.\ News feeds (created in 2011) are without S.S.L. [1] It was discussed at [2], but nothing ever happened. [1] http://feeds.bbci.co.uk/news/world/asia/rss.xml [2] https://github.com/kouya/snownews/issues/6#issuecomment-384389708 -- Ashley Dixon suugaku.co.uk 2A9A 4117 DA96 D18A 8A7B B0D2 A30E BF25 F290 A8AA signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Re: best rss reader?
On 2020-04-20 05:09, Ashley Dixon wrote: > [1] https://github.com/kouya/snownews Snownews seems to lack SSL support completely, or am I wrong? The great majority of feeds I read are https:// URLs. -- Ian
[gentoo-user] Re: best rss reader?
On 2020-04-19 21:15, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote: > i have newsboat, but it got masked. Really? Masked as in package.mask? When? I don't see that. I use it too, and it is better than the alternatives IMO. -- Ian
