RE: [gentoo-user] Several arches installed, flag kernel automatically

2007-01-04 Thread Nelson, David \(ED, PARD\)
 -Original Message-
 From: Matthias Fechner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 03 January 2007 17:46
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Several arches installed, flag kernel
 automatically
 
 No :)
 
 I want to use make install and the Makefile should not generate a
 vmlinuz it should generate a vmlinuz-$LOCALVERSION.
 
 You know if that is possible?


At the risk of maybe coming off as slightly rude (not my intention!) -
why not? It is the simplest solution to make sure the kernels don't
interfere with each other.

You could try playing with the makefile I guess - there should be some
sort of instruction in there to tell it where to put the kernel. I would
have a look myself if I had a copy of the kernel stuff to hand.

David On a Windows 2000 workstation... boo Nelson

Note: These views are my own, advice is provided with no guarantee of
success. I do not represent anyone else in any emails I send to this
list.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Several arches installed, flag kernel automatically

2007-01-03 Thread Matthias Fechner
Hi,

I have here two gentoo systems one 32-bit and one 64-bit.

To save space on my harddisk the mounts /home and /boot are used from
both systems.

Now I have the problem with the kernel version.
Both systems running kernel 2.6.18-gentoo-r6.

If I install now the kernel from the 64-bit system it overwrites the
kernel from the 32-bit system.
In the kernel config is a variable available LOCALVERSION to append
some text to the kernel to prevent the overwrite.

Is it possible to global define this variable e.g. in /etc/make.conf?

Thx a lot,
Matthias

-- 

Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to
produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning. --
Rich Cook
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Several arches installed, flag kernel automatically

2007-01-03 Thread Ryan Sims

On 1/3/07, Matthias Fechner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

I have here two gentoo systems one 32-bit and one 64-bit.

To save space on my harddisk the mounts /home and /boot are used from
both systems.

Now I have the problem with the kernel version.
Both systems running kernel 2.6.18-gentoo-r6.

If I install now the kernel from the 64-bit system it overwrites the
kernel from the 32-bit system.


I assume you're using make install after building your kernel?  I
usually do a cp arch/[insert your arch here]/boot/bzImage
/boot/kernel-[version string] (and then one for the System.map)
Would that do what you want?

--
Ryan W Sims
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Several arches installed, flag kernel automatically

2007-01-03 Thread Matthias Fechner
Hello Ryan,

* Ryan Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-01-07 12:11]:
 I assume you're using make install after building your kernel?  I
 usually do a cp arch/[insert your arch here]/boot/bzImage
 /boot/kernel-[version string] (and then one for the System.map)
 Would that do what you want?

No :)

I want to use make install and the Makefile should not generate a
vmlinuz it should generate a vmlinuz-$LOCALVERSION.

You know if that is possible?

Thx a lot
Matthias

-- 

Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to
produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning. --
Rich Cook
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list