[gentoo-user] The Future of the Gentoo Foundation
http://www.osnews.com/story.php/18315/The-Future-of-the-Gentoo-Foundation A friend provided me this link, and I'm a little worried... Is this truth, and if it is, how is this problem being solved? I guess this is the right place to ask, as all of us users should be concerned about this... -- Daniel da Veiga Computer Operator - RS - Brazil -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V- PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] The Future of the Gentoo Foundation
Well, we should ask the devs as well, since I'd say they're the ones primarily involved with this. Or at least those who could actually do something about it. -- Samir On 7/27/07, Daniel da Veiga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.osnews.com/story.php/18315/The-Future-of-the-Gentoo-Foundation A friend provided me this link, and I'm a little worried... Is this truth, and if it is, how is this problem being solved? I guess this is the right place to ask, as all of us users should be concerned about this... -- Daniel da Veiga Computer Operator - RS - Brazil -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V- PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] The Future of the Gentoo Foundation
On Freitag, 27. Juli 2007, Daniel da Veiga wrote: http://www.osnews.com/story.php/18315/The-Future-of-the-Gentoo-Foundation this is only a (small) part of what Mr Robbins wrote. here is the complete blog-post: http://blog.funtoo.org/ A friend provided me this link, and I'm a little worried... Is this truth, and if it is, how is this problem being solved? well, it is true, that there are problems with paperworks. I guess this is the right place to ask, as all of us users should be concerned about this... maybe. But I can't see why we users should be concerned. It does not matter for us if gentoo stays 'independent' or not. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] The Future of the Gentoo Foundation
Then the idea that the Gentoo Foundation might 'cease to exist as an entity' isn't really bad news? Some clarification might be in order. On 7/27/07, Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Freitag, 27. Juli 2007, Daniel da Veiga wrote: http://www.osnews.com/story.php/18315/The-Future-of-the-Gentoo-Foundation this is only a (small) part of what Mr Robbins wrote. here is the complete blog-post: http://blog.funtoo.org/ A friend provided me this link, and I'm a little worried... Is this truth, and if it is, how is this problem being solved? well, it is true, that there are problems with paperworks. I guess this is the right place to ask, as all of us users should be concerned about this... maybe. But I can't see why we users should be concerned. It does not matter for us if gentoo stays 'independent' or not. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- -·=»Ðŧħ«=·- z� ��(��j)b� b�
Re: [gentoo-user] The Future of the Gentoo Foundation
On Friday 27 July 2007, Dan Cowsill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] The Future of the Gentoo Foundation': Then the idea that the Gentoo Foundation might 'cease to exist as an entity' isn't really bad news? It's bad news, but not as bad as you think. Some clarification might be in order. The foundation serves an a single legal entity that can do and own things on behalf of Gentoo. However, before the foundation things were done and owned by the volunteers that make up Gentoo. This is not ideal, which is why the foundation was created, but Gentoo could certainly run like that again until the foundation could be reformed under management that knows how to file paperwork. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
