Hi,
it doesn't matter that much, but I use pkgconf, it's a rewrite of pkg-config
which does some things better ( like determining what has to be linked into the
binary ) and works fine for me.
Regards,
Rasmus
Original Message
On 8 Jul 2017, 19:57, wrote:
> I have two blockers and not sure which one to remove.
> It seems to me they are contradicting each other.
>
> [blocks B ] dev-util/pkgconf[pkg-config] ("dev-util/pkgconf[pkg-config]" is
> blocking dev-util/pkgconfig-0.28-r2)
> [blocks B ] dev-util/pkgconfig ("dev-util/pkgconfig" is blocking
> dev-util/pkgconf-0.9.12)
>
>>=dev-util/pkgconf-0.9.12[pkg-config,abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]
>> (>=dev-util/pkgconf-0.9.12[pkg-config,abi_x86_32(-),abi_x86_64(-)]) required
>>by (virtual/pkgconfig-0-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed)
>
> (dev-util/pkgconfig-0.28-r2:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
> in by
>>=dev-util/pkgconfig-0.28-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]
>> (>=dev-util/pkgconfig-0.28-r1[abi_x86_32(-),abi_x86_64(-)]) required by
>>(virtual/pkgconfig-0-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed)
>
> equery d dev-util/pkgconfig
> * These packages depend on dev-util/pkgconfig:
> virtual/pkgconfig-0-r1
> (>=dev-util/pkgconfig-0.28-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?])
>
> equery d dev-util/pkgconf
> * These packages depend on dev-util/pkgconf:
> virtual/pkgconfig-0-r1
> (>=dev-util/pkgconf-0.9.12[pkg-config,abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?])
>
> --
> Thelma
